Suppr超能文献

经直肠前列腺穿刺活检中前列腺周围阻滞是否能减轻疼痛?一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究。

Does periprostatic block reduce pain during transrectal prostate biopsy? A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study.

机构信息

Ministrelli Program for Urologic Research and Education, William Beaumont Hospital, 3535 W. Thirteen Mile Rd., Suite 438, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2010 Mar;42(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-009-9621-2. Epub 2009 Aug 8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Currently, the use of local anesthetic at the time of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate is not universally accepted, as the needle injection itself causes pain. In prior studies, lidocaine was compared to placebo in separate patient groups. We present the first study to evaluate both lidocaine and placebo injected in each patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients received periprostatic injections of both lidocaine and placebo, randomized to separate sides of the prostate, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial design. Injections were delivered at the angle between the seminal vesicle and prostate on each side. Patients graded pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10) after injections and after each biopsy. Patients were surveyed to evaluate overall pain and discomfort before discharge. We used Student's t-test to compare the mean VAS scores between lidocaine and placebo.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) VAS after biopsy was 1.9 (1.4) on the lidocaine side and 2.3 (1.4) on the placebo side (P = 0.202). Pain after the injection itself was similar to pain after biopsy, with the mean (SD) VAS of 2.4 (1.6) and 2.2 (1.7) after lidocaine and placebo injections, respectively (P = 0.546). None of the differences were statistically significant. Twenty-nine (59.2%) patients reported no pain at the time of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain experienced during transrectal biopsy of the prostate is mild and is not significantly lowered with periprostatic nerve block. Pain from injection itself is similar to pain from core biopsies. Pain from transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate is well tolerated with no anesthesia.

摘要

简介

目前,在经直肠超声引导前列腺活检时使用局部麻醉并未被普遍接受,因为针注射本身会引起疼痛。在之前的研究中,利多卡因与安慰剂在不同的患者群体中进行了比较。我们首次进行了一项研究,评估了在每位患者中注射利多卡因和安慰剂的效果。

材料与方法

50 名患者接受了经直肠超声引导前列腺活检时的前列腺周围注射,利多卡因和安慰剂分别注射到前列腺的两侧,采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验设计。注射在每侧精囊和前列腺之间的角度进行。患者在注射后和每次活检后使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)(0-10)对疼痛进行评分。在出院前,患者接受了总体疼痛和不适的调查。我们使用学生 t 检验比较利多卡因和安慰剂的平均 VAS 评分。

结果

利多卡因侧活检后 VAS 的平均值(标准差)为 1.9(1.4),安慰剂侧为 2.3(1.4)(P=0.202)。注射本身后的疼痛与活检后疼痛相似,利多卡因和安慰剂注射后的平均 VAS 分别为 2.4(1.6)和 2.2(1.7)(P=0.546)。这些差异均无统计学意义。29 名(59.2%)患者在出院时报告无疼痛。

结论

经直肠前列腺活检时的疼痛是轻微的,经前列腺周围神经阻滞并不能显著降低疼痛。注射本身引起的疼痛与核心活检引起的疼痛相似。经直肠超声引导前列腺活检可以耐受,无需麻醉。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验