Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 West Taylor Street, 650 AHSB, M/C 994, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jan;200(1):67-79. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1966-3. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
Visual feedback is essential when minimizing force fluctuations. Varying degrees of somatotopic organization have been shown in different regions of the brain for the upper and lower extremities, and visual feedback may be processed differently based on the body effector where feedback-based corrections are used. This study compared the effect of changes in visual gain on the control of steady-state force at the elbow and ankle. Ten subjects produced steady-state isometric force to targets at 5 and 40% of their maximum voluntary contraction at seven visual gain levels. Visual gain was used effectively at both joints to reduce variability of the force signal and to improve accuracy, with a greater effect of visual gain at the elbow than the ankle. Visual gain significantly decreased the regularity of force output, and this effect was more pronounced at the elbow than the ankle. There were accompanying changes in the proportion of power in the 0-4, 4-8, and 8-12 Hz frequency bins of the force signal across visual gain at the elbow. Changes in visual gain were accompanied by changes in both agonist and antagonist electromyographic (EMG) activation at the elbow. At the ankle joint, there were only changes in agonist EMG. The results suggest better use of visual information in the control of elbow force than ankle force and this improved control may be related to the changes in the pattern of agonist and antagonist activation.
当最小化力波动时,视觉反馈至关重要。在上肢和下肢的不同脑区已经显示出不同程度的躯体感觉组织,并且基于用于基于反馈的校正的身体效应器,视觉反馈的处理可能会有所不同。本研究比较了视觉增益变化对肘部和踝关节稳态力控制的影响。十位受试者在七个视觉增益水平下以 5%和 40%的最大自主收缩力产生稳态等长力。视觉增益在两个关节都被有效地用于减少力信号的可变性并提高准确性,在肘部的效果大于在踝关节的效果。视觉增益显著降低了力输出的规律性,并且在肘部比在踝关节更明显。在肘部的力信号的 0-4、4-8 和 8-12 Hz 频带中,功率的比例随视觉增益而变化。视觉增益的变化伴随着肘部的拮抗剂和拮抗剂肌电图(EMG)激活的变化。在踝关节,只有拮抗剂 EMG 发生变化。结果表明,在肘部力的控制中比在踝关节力的控制中更好地利用了视觉信息,并且这种改进的控制可能与拮抗剂激活模式的变化有关。