Gruenewald Tara L, Seeman Teresa E, Karlamangla Arun S, Sarkisian Catherine A
Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 10945 LeConte Ave, Suite 2339, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Sep;57(9):1525-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02389.x. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
To examine the association between allostatic load (AL), an index of multisystem physiological dysregulation, and frailty development over a 3-year follow-up in a sample of older adults.
Longitudinal cohort study.
Community.
High-functioning men and women aged 70 to 79 at study entry.
Multisystem physiological dysregulation, or AL, was assessed according to 13 biomarkers of cardiovascular, endocrine, immune, and metabolic function. An AL score was computed as the total number of biomarkers for which participant values fell into high-risk biomarker quartiles. Frailty status (not frail, intermediate frail, frail) was determined according to the total number of five indicators of frailty: weight loss, exhaustion, weak grip, slow gait, and low physical activity. The association between level of AL at baseline and frailty status 3 years later was examined using ordinal logistic regression in 803 participants not frail at baseline.
In a multivariable model adjusting for sociodemographic, health, and behavioral characteristics, each 1-unit increase in AL at baseline was associated with a 10% greater likelihood of frailty at the 3-year follow-up (cumulative adjusted odds ratio=1.10, 95% confidence interval=1.03-1.19).
These findings support the hypothesis that dysregulation across multiple physiological systems is associated with greater risk of frailty. Greater levels of multisystem physiological dysregulation may serve as a warning sign of frailty development in later life.
在一组老年人样本中,研究多系统生理失调指标——应变负荷(AL)与3年随访期间衰弱发展之间的关联。
纵向队列研究。
社区。
研究开始时年龄在70至79岁、功能良好的男性和女性。
根据心血管、内分泌、免疫和代谢功能的13种生物标志物评估多系统生理失调,即AL。AL得分计算为参与者值落入高风险生物标志物四分位数的生物标志物总数。根据体重减轻、疲惫、握力弱、步态缓慢和身体活动量低这五种衰弱指标的总数确定衰弱状态(非衰弱、中度衰弱、衰弱)。在803名基线时非衰弱的参与者中,使用有序逻辑回归分析基线时的AL水平与3年后衰弱状态之间的关联。
在调整了社会人口统计学、健康和行为特征的多变量模型中,基线时AL每增加1个单位,在3年随访时衰弱的可能性就增加10%(累积调整优势比=1.10,95%置信区间=1.03-1.19)。
这些发现支持了这样一种假设,即多个生理系统的失调与更高的衰弱风险相关。更高水平的多系统生理失调可能是晚年衰弱发展的一个警示信号。