Suppr超能文献

老年衰弱亚维度的初步证据:麦克阿瑟成功老龄化研究

Preliminary evidence for subdimensions of geriatric frailty: the MacArthur study of successful aging.

作者信息

Sarkisian Catherine A, Gruenewald Tara L, John Boscardin W, Seeman Teresa E

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Los Angeles, California 90073, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Dec;56(12):2292-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02041.x. Epub 2008 Nov 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify frailty subdimensions.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort (MacArthur Study).

SETTING

Three U.S. urban centers.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand one hundred eighteen high-functioning subjects aged 70 to 79 in 1988.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants with three or more of five Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) frailty criteria (weight loss, weak grip, exhaustion, slow gait, and low physical activity) in 1991 were classified as having the CHS frailty phenotype. To identify frailty subdimensions, factor analysis was conducted using the CHS variables and an expanded set including the CHS variables, cognitive impairment, interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), subjective weakness, and anorexia. Participants with four or more of 10 criteria were classified as having an expanded frailty phenotype. Predictive validity of each identified frailty subdimension was assessed using regression models for 4-year disability and 9-year mortality.

RESULTS

Two subdimensions of the CHS phenotype and four subdimensions of the expanded frailty phenotype were identified. Cognitive function was consistently part of a subdimension including slower gait, weaker grip, and lower physical activity. The CHS subdimension of slower gait, weaker grip, and lower physical activity predicted disability (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.3-2.2) and mortality (AOR=1.5, 95% CI=1.3-1.8). Subdimensions of the expanded model with predictive validity were higher IL-6 and CRP (AOR=1.2 for mortality); slower gait, weaker grip, lower physical activity, and lower cognitive function (AOR=1.8 for disability; AOR=1.5 for mortality), and anorexia and weight loss (AOR=1.2 for disability).

CONCLUSION

This study provides preliminary empirical support for subdimensions of geriatric frailty, suggesting that pathways to frailty differ and that subdimension-adapted care might enhance care of frail seniors.

摘要

目的

识别衰弱亚维度。

设计

纵向队列研究(麦克阿瑟研究)。

地点

美国三个城市中心。

参与者

1988年1118名70至79岁功能良好的受试者。

测量方法

1991年,符合五项心血管健康研究(CHS)衰弱标准(体重减轻、握力弱、疲惫、步态缓慢和体力活动少)中三项或更多项的参与者被归类为具有CHS衰弱表型。为了识别衰弱亚维度,使用CHS变量以及包括CHS变量、认知障碍、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、主观虚弱和厌食症在内的扩展数据集进行因子分析。符合10项标准中4项或更多项的参与者被归类为具有扩展衰弱表型。使用4年残疾和9年死亡率的回归模型评估每个识别出的衰弱亚维度的预测效度。

结果

识别出CHS表型的两个亚维度和扩展衰弱表型的四个亚维度。认知功能始终是一个亚维度的一部分,该亚维度包括步态较慢、握力较弱和体力活动较少。步态较慢、握力较弱和体力活动较少的CHS亚维度可预测残疾(调整优势比[AOR]=1.7,95%置信区间[CI]=1.3 - 2.2)和死亡率(AOR=1.5,95% CI=1.3 - 1.8)。具有预测效度的扩展模型的亚维度包括较高的IL-6和CRP(死亡率AOR=1.2);步态较慢、握力较弱、体力活动较少和认知功能较低(残疾AOR=1.8;死亡率AOR=1.5),以及厌食症和体重减轻(残疾AOR=1.2)。

结论

本研究为老年衰弱的亚维度提供了初步实证支持,表明衰弱的途径各不相同,且针对亚维度的护理可能会改善对衰弱老年人的护理。

相似文献

2
A comparison of four frailty models.四种虚弱模型的比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Apr;62(4):721-6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12735. Epub 2014 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Frailty and the foolishness of Eos.衰老与黎明女神厄俄斯的愚蠢。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Mar;61(3):260-1. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.3.260.
7
Just what defines frailty?究竟什么定义了虚弱?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Dec;53(12):2229-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00510.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验