Sarkisian Catherine A, Gruenewald Tara L, John Boscardin W, Seeman Teresa E
Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Los Angeles, California 90073, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Dec;56(12):2292-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02041.x. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
To identify frailty subdimensions.
Longitudinal cohort (MacArthur Study).
Three U.S. urban centers.
One thousand one hundred eighteen high-functioning subjects aged 70 to 79 in 1988.
Participants with three or more of five Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) frailty criteria (weight loss, weak grip, exhaustion, slow gait, and low physical activity) in 1991 were classified as having the CHS frailty phenotype. To identify frailty subdimensions, factor analysis was conducted using the CHS variables and an expanded set including the CHS variables, cognitive impairment, interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), subjective weakness, and anorexia. Participants with four or more of 10 criteria were classified as having an expanded frailty phenotype. Predictive validity of each identified frailty subdimension was assessed using regression models for 4-year disability and 9-year mortality.
Two subdimensions of the CHS phenotype and four subdimensions of the expanded frailty phenotype were identified. Cognitive function was consistently part of a subdimension including slower gait, weaker grip, and lower physical activity. The CHS subdimension of slower gait, weaker grip, and lower physical activity predicted disability (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.3-2.2) and mortality (AOR=1.5, 95% CI=1.3-1.8). Subdimensions of the expanded model with predictive validity were higher IL-6 and CRP (AOR=1.2 for mortality); slower gait, weaker grip, lower physical activity, and lower cognitive function (AOR=1.8 for disability; AOR=1.5 for mortality), and anorexia and weight loss (AOR=1.2 for disability).
This study provides preliminary empirical support for subdimensions of geriatric frailty, suggesting that pathways to frailty differ and that subdimension-adapted care might enhance care of frail seniors.
识别衰弱亚维度。
纵向队列研究(麦克阿瑟研究)。
美国三个城市中心。
1988年1118名70至79岁功能良好的受试者。
1991年,符合五项心血管健康研究(CHS)衰弱标准(体重减轻、握力弱、疲惫、步态缓慢和体力活动少)中三项或更多项的参与者被归类为具有CHS衰弱表型。为了识别衰弱亚维度,使用CHS变量以及包括CHS变量、认知障碍、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、主观虚弱和厌食症在内的扩展数据集进行因子分析。符合10项标准中4项或更多项的参与者被归类为具有扩展衰弱表型。使用4年残疾和9年死亡率的回归模型评估每个识别出的衰弱亚维度的预测效度。
识别出CHS表型的两个亚维度和扩展衰弱表型的四个亚维度。认知功能始终是一个亚维度的一部分,该亚维度包括步态较慢、握力较弱和体力活动较少。步态较慢、握力较弱和体力活动较少的CHS亚维度可预测残疾(调整优势比[AOR]=1.7,95%置信区间[CI]=1.3 - 2.2)和死亡率(AOR=1.5,95% CI=1.3 - 1.8)。具有预测效度的扩展模型的亚维度包括较高的IL-6和CRP(死亡率AOR=1.2);步态较慢、握力较弱、体力活动较少和认知功能较低(残疾AOR=1.8;死亡率AOR=1.5),以及厌食症和体重减轻(残疾AOR=1.2)。
本研究为老年衰弱的亚维度提供了初步实证支持,表明衰弱的途径各不相同,且针对亚维度的护理可能会改善对衰弱老年人的护理。