Suppr超能文献

跨种族面孔学习缺陷:来自眼动和瞳孔测量的见解。

Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry.

作者信息

Goldinger Stephen D, He Yi, Papesh Megan H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Box 871104, Tempe, AZ 85233, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1105-22. doi: 10.1037/a0016548.

Abstract

The own-race bias (ORB) is a well-known finding wherein people are better able to recognize and discriminate own-race faces, relative to cross-race faces. In 2 experiments, participants viewed Asian and Caucasian faces, in preparation for recognition memory tests, while their eye movements and pupil diameters were continuously monitored. In Experiment 1 (with Caucasian participants), systematic differences emerged in both measures as a function of depicted race: While encoding cross-race faces, participants made fewer (and longer) fixations, they preferentially attended to different sets of features, and their pupils were more dilated, all relative to own-race faces. Also, in both measures, a pattern emerged wherein some participants reduced their apparent encoding effort to cross-race faces over trials. In Experiment 2 (with Asian participants), the authors observed the same patterns, although the ORB favored the opposite set of faces. Taken together, the results suggest that the ORB appears during initial perceptual encoding. Relative to own-race face encoding, cross-race encoding requires greater effort, which may reduce vigilance in some participants.

摘要

同种族偏见(ORB)是一个著名的发现,即相对于其他种族的面孔,人们能够更好地识别和区分同种族的面孔。在两项实验中,参与者观看亚洲人和高加索人的面孔,为识别记忆测试做准备,同时他们的眼球运动和瞳孔直径被持续监测。在实验1(参与者为高加索人)中,这两项测量中都出现了系统性差异,该差异是所描绘种族的函数:在编码其他种族面孔时,与同种族面孔相比,参与者的注视次数更少(且时间更长),他们优先关注不同的特征集,并且他们的瞳孔扩张得更厉害。此外,在这两项测量中,出现了一种模式,即一些参与者在多次试验中减少了对其他种族面孔的明显编码努力。在实验2(参与者为亚洲人)中,作者观察到了相同的模式,尽管同种族偏见有利于相反的面孔组。综合来看,结果表明同种族偏见出现在初始感知编码过程中。相对于同种族面孔编码,其他种族编码需要更大的努力,这可能会降低一些参与者的警觉性。

相似文献

1
Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1105-22. doi: 10.1037/a0016548.
2
Through the eyes of the own-race bias: eye-tracking and pupillometry during face recognition.
Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(2):202-16. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.596946. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
4
Eye-tracking the own-race bias in face recognition: revealing the perceptual and socio-cognitive mechanisms.
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):586-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
5
The neural signature of the own-race bias: evidence from event-related potentials.
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Mar;24(3):826-35. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs369. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
6
An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces.
Perception. 2003;32(9):1117-25. doi: 10.1068/p5098.
9
Task-irrelevant own-race faces capture attention: eye-tracking evidence.
Scand J Psychol. 2013 Apr;54(2):78-81. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12027. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Dissociating effects of gaze direction and facial motion on memory of dynamic faces.
Mem Cognit. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01770-5.
3
Encoding of Race Categories by Single Neurons in the Human Brain.
NeuroSci. 2022 Aug 5;3(3):419-439. doi: 10.3390/neurosci3030031. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
7
"We choose this CV because we choose diversity" - What do eye movements say about the choices recruiters make?
Front Sociol. 2024 Mar 7;9:1222850. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1222850. eCollection 2024.
8
Differences in eye movements for face recognition between Canadian and Chinese participants are not modulated by social orientation.
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0295256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295256. eCollection 2023.
9
Age Weakens the Other-Race Effect among Han Subjects in Recognizing Own- and Other-Ethnicity Faces.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;13(8):675. doi: 10.3390/bs13080675.

本文引用的文献

1
Culture shapes how we look at faces.
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 20;3(8):e3022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003022.
2
The face inversion effect is not a consequence of aberrant eye movements.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):1977-85. doi: 10.3758/bf03192930.
3
Effort during visual search and counting: insights from pupillometry.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Feb;60(2):211-29. doi: 10.1080/17470210600673818.
4
Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):865-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03193433.
5
Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one's own race.
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):608-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01752.x.
6
The generation and resemblance heuristics in face recognition: cooperation and competition.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Mar;32(2):259-76. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.259.
7
"We all look the same to me": positive emotions eliminate the own-race in face recognition.
Psychol Sci. 2005 Nov;16(11):875-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01631.x.
8
Thirty-something categorization results explained: selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):811-29. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.811.
9
Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):1-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Mar 19.
10
Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing.
Mem Cognit. 2005 Mar;33(2):344-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03195322.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验