Suppr超能文献

迈向标准化、可比较的公共卫生系统数据:基本公共卫生工作的分类描述。

Toward standardized, comparable public health systems data: a taxonomic description of essential public health work.

作者信息

Merrill Jacqueline, Keeling Jonathan, Gebbie Kristine

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, Vanderbilt Clinic, New York, NY 10034, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 2):1818-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01015.x. Epub 2009 Aug 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify taxonomy of task, knowledge, and resources for documenting the work performed in local health departments (LHDs).

DATA SOURCES

Secondary data were collected from documents describing public health (PH) practice produced by organizations representing the PH community.

STUDY DESIGN

A multistep consensus-based method was used that included literature review, data extraction, expert opinion, focus group review, and pilot testing.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

Terms and concepts were manually extracted from documents, consolidated, and evaluated for scope and sufficiency by researchers. An expert panel determined suitability of terms and a hierarchy for classifying them. This work was validated by practitioners and results pilot tested in two LHDs.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The finalized taxonomy was applied to compare a national sample of 11 LHDs. Data were obtained from 1,064 of 1,267 (84 percent) of employees. Frequencies of tasks, knowledge, and resources constitute a profile of PH work. About 70 percent of the correlations between LHD pairs on tasks and knowledge were high (>0.7), suggesting between-department commonalities. On resources only 16 percent of correlations between LHD pairs were high, suggesting a source of performance variability.

CONCLUSIONS

A taxonomy of PH work serves as a tool for comparative research and a framework for further development.

摘要

目的

确定用于记录地方卫生部门(LHD)所开展工作的任务、知识和资源的分类法。

数据来源

二手数据收集自代表公共卫生(PH)领域的组织所产生的描述公共卫生实践的文件。

研究设计

采用了一种基于共识的多步骤方法,包括文献综述、数据提取、专家意见、焦点小组审查和预试验。

数据提取方法

术语和概念由研究人员从文件中手动提取、整合,并对其范围和充分性进行评估。一个专家小组确定术语的适用性及其分类层次结构。这项工作由从业者进行了验证,并在两个地方卫生部门进行了预试验。

主要发现

最终确定的分类法被用于比较11个地方卫生部门的全国样本。从1267名员工中的1064名(84%)获取了数据。任务、知识和资源的频率构成了公共卫生工作的概况。地方卫生部门在任务和知识方面的配对之间约70%的相关性较高(>0.7),表明部门之间存在共性。在资源方面,地方卫生部门配对之间只有16%的相关性较高,表明这是绩效差异的一个来源。

结论

公共卫生工作分类法可作为比较研究的工具和进一步发展的框架。

相似文献

2
A comparative study of 11 local health department organizational networks.11 个地方卫生部门组织网络的比较研究。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):564-76. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181e31cee.
10
Understanding the local public health workforce: labels versus substance.了解当地公共卫生人力:标签与实质内容。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Nov;47(5 Suppl 3):S324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.019. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

3
Public health workforce taxonomy.公共卫生人力分类法。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Nov;47(5 Suppl 3):S314-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
A comparative study of 11 local health department organizational networks.11 个地方卫生部门组织网络的比较研究。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):564-76. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181e31cee.

本文引用的文献

2
An empirical taxonomy of hospital governing board roles.医院管理委员会角色的实证分类法。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug;43(4):1223-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00835.x. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
4
Public health workforce enumeration: beware the "quick fix".公共卫生人力普查:谨防“快速解决之道”。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):72-9. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200701000-00012.
5
The case for transforming governmental public health.变革政府公共卫生事业的理由。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):1017-28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.1017.
7
Rejoinder to taxonomy of health networks and systems: a reassessment.对卫生网络与系统分类法的回应:重新评估
Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun;41(3 Pt 1):629-39; author reply 640-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00525.x.
8
Taxonomy of health networks and systems: a reassessment.卫生网络与系统的分类:重新评估
Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun;41(3 Pt 1):618-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00524.x.
9
Roles of local public health agencies within the state public health system.地方公共卫生机构在州公共卫生系统中的作用。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2006 May-Jun;12(3):232-41. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200605000-00003.
10
Public health systems research: setting a national agenda.公共卫生系统研究:制定国家议程。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):410-3. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.046037. Epub 2006 Jan 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验