Infectious Disease and Emergency Preparedness Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 18;4(8):e6681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006681.
The weekly proportion of laboratory tests that are positive for influenza is used in public health surveillance systems to identify periods of influenza activity. We aimed to estimate the sensitivity of influenza testing in Canada based on results of a national respiratory virus surveillance system.
The weekly number of influenza-negative tests from 1999 to 2006 was modelled as a function of laboratory-confirmed positive tests for influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus and parainfluenza viruses, seasonality, and trend using Poisson regression. Sensitivity was calculated as the number of influenza positive tests divided by the number of influenza positive tests plus the model-estimated number of false negative tests. The sensitivity of influenza testing was estimated to be 33% (95%CI 32-34%), varying from 30-40% depending on the season and region.
The estimated sensitivity of influenza tests reported to this national laboratory surveillance system is considerably less than reported test characteristics for most laboratory tests. A number of factors may explain this difference, including sample quality and specimen procurement issues as well as test characteristics. Improved diagnosis would permit better estimation of the burden of influenza.
公共卫生监测系统采用每周实验室检测出的流感阳性比例来确定流感活动期。本研究旨在基于国家呼吸道病毒监测系统的结果,评估加拿大流感检测的敏感性。
采用泊松回归方法,根据实验室确诊的流感、呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)、腺病毒和副流感病毒阳性检测数、季节性和趋势,对 1999 年至 2006 年每周流感阴性检测数进行建模。将流感阳性检测数除以流感阳性检测数加模型估计的假阴性检测数,计算流感检测的敏感性。流感检测的敏感性估计为 33%(95%CI 32-34%),因季节和地区不同而在 30-40%之间变化。
与大多数实验室检测报告的检测特征相比,本国家级实验室监测系统报告的流感检测敏感性明显较低。许多因素可能导致这种差异,包括样本质量和标本采集问题以及检测特征。改进诊断方法将有助于更好地估计流感的负担。