• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎前路椎间盘切除术及钛笼融合术——7年随访

Anterior cervical discectomy and titanium cage fusion - 7-year follow-up.

作者信息

Rohe Simone M, Engelhardt M, Harders A, Schmieder K

机构信息

Ruhr-University, Department of Neurosurgery, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2009 Nov;70(4):180-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220940. Epub 2009 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1220940
PMID:19722129
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and titanium cage fusion (ACDF) and titanium cage fusion. Special focus was on the adjacent levels.

METHODS

54 patients (age: 48+/-10 years; one level operation in 44 patients and two level operation in 10 patients) entered the study. Re-evaluation consisted of a clinical out patient investigation and was possible in 33 patients. VAS, PROLO and Oswestry scores were used. Lateral radiographs were taken and changes in the operated and adjacent segments were measured and compared to radiographs directly after surgery. Clinical patient data was compared with the data prior to surgery.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time of the 33 patients was 7.26 +/- 0.22 years. One patient needed re-surgery of the cervical spine above the fused segment. PROLO results showed a significant improvement (PROLO F 1.52+/-0.67 to 3.79+/-1.17 p<0.01; PROLO E 1.52+/-0.5 to 3.55+/-1.42 p<0.01). Mean VAS at the time of investigation was 3.2+/-2.5. Oswestry score was 16.4+/-9.5. The alignment of the whole cervical spine was stable lordotic (Katsuura 10.9+/-9.0 degrees to 11.5+/-7.8 degrees ; p=0.76). Total segmental height had reduced from 36.6+/-4.6 mm to 34.6+/-3.9 mm (p=0.04). No significant reduction of disc space height of adjacent levels was detectable (superior: 5.8+/-1.6 mm to 5.2+/-1.6 mm; inferior: 6.0+/-1.7 mm to 5.3+/-1.9 mm). One adjacent superior level showed spontaneous fusion. Ventral and dorsal osteophytes in the superior and inferior adjacent levels increased in number and increased significantly in degree. Patients with bi-segmental fusion (n=7) showed similar results.

CONCLUSION

ACDF with titanium cages has good clinical long-term results. A significant progression of degenerative changes can be observed on radiographs without clinical consequences for the patients. A comparison with patients without surgery and conservative therapy is needed to allow a better interpretation of the radiological results.

摘要

背景与研究目的

本研究的目的是前瞻性评估颈椎前路椎间盘切除钛笼融合术(ACDF)后的长期疗效,特别关注相邻节段。

方法

54例患者(年龄:48±10岁;44例患者接受单节段手术,10例患者接受双节段手术)进入研究。重新评估包括临床门诊调查,33例患者可进行此项评估。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、PROLO评分和奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数(Oswestry)评分。拍摄颈椎侧位X线片,测量手术节段和相邻节段的变化,并与术后即刻的X线片进行比较。将患者的临床数据与术前数据进行比较。

结果

33例患者的平均随访时间为7.26±0.22年。1例患者需要对融合节段上方的颈椎进行再次手术。PROLO评分结果显示有显著改善(PROLO F从1.52±0.67提高到3.79±1.17,p<0.01;PROLO E从1.52±0.5提高到3.55±1.42,p<0.01)。调查时的平均VAS评分为3.2±2.5。Oswestry评分为16.4±9.5。整个颈椎的曲度保持稳定前凸(Katsuura角从10.9±9.0度变为11.5±7.8度;p = 0.76)。节段总高度从36.6±4.6mm降至34.6±3.9mm(p = 0.04)。未检测到相邻节段椎间盘间隙高度有显著降低(上方:从5.8±1.6mm降至5.2±1.6mm;下方:从6.0±1.7mm降至5.3±1.9mm)。一个相邻的上位节段出现自发融合。上下相邻节段的腹侧和背侧骨赘数量增加,程度显著加重。双节段融合患者(n = 7)的结果相似。

结论

钛笼ACDF具有良好的临床长期疗效。X线片上可观察到退变改变有显著进展,但对患者无临床影响。需要与未手术及保守治疗的患者进行比较,以便更好地解读影像学结果。

相似文献

1
Anterior cervical discectomy and titanium cage fusion - 7-year follow-up.颈椎前路椎间盘切除术及钛笼融合术——7年随访
Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2009 Nov;70(4):180-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220940. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
2
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft.前路颈椎间盘切除及可植入钛笼融合术:初步印象、患者预后及与同种异体骨融合术的比较
Spine J. 2004 Mar-Apr;4(2):184-91; discussion 191. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.05.001.
3
Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation.三级和四级颈椎前路椎间盘切除术以及带或不带钢板固定的钛笼增强融合术。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Sep;1(2):160-7. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0160.
4
Subsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervical interbody fusion: 2-year follow-up study.颈椎前路椎间融合术后钛翼形椎间融合器下沉:2年随访研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Jun;4(6):447-53. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.6.447.
5
Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage: early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence.前路颈椎椎间融合术联合钛盒融合器:融合及下沉的早期影像学评估
Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):645-9; discussion 649. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.007.
6
Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease.人工椎间盘置换联合融合术与双节段颈椎间盘疾病的双节段融合术的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 15;34(11):1153-9; discussion 1160-1. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c9d39.
7
Clinical adjacent-segment pathology after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results after a minimum of 10-year follow-up.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后的临床相邻节段病变:至少10年随访结果
Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2290-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
8
Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.独立椎间融合器辅助下颈椎前路融合术中椎间融合器下沉导致矢状面排列不齐的相关影响因素
Eur Spine J. 2007 Sep;16(9):1395-400. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0284-8. Epub 2007 Jan 13.
9
Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.使用动态颈椎植入物进行稳定化:颈椎间盘切除及减压术后的一种新型治疗方法。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
Anterior decompression and interbody fusion with BAK/C for cervical disc degenerative disorders.采用BAK/C前路减压及椎间融合术治疗颈椎间盘退变疾病。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jun;22(4):240-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31816d5f7e.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Interbody Composition on the Development of Pseudarthrosis Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.椎间融合器成分对颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后假关节形成的影响。
Asian Spine J. 2023 Jun;17(3):518-528. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0258. Epub 2023 May 9.
2
Titanium versus polyetheretherketone versus structural allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A systematic review.钛合金与聚醚醚酮及结构性同种异体移植物在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的应用:一项系统评价
Brain Spine. 2022 Aug 22;2:100923. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100923. eCollection 2022.
3
A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Local Autografts and Allografts in Single Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Stand-Alone Cage.
一项使用独立椎间融合器,比较单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中局部自体骨移植和同种异体骨移植的随机对照试验。
Asian Spine J. 2021 Dec;15(6):817-824. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0182. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
4
Long-term results after thoracoscopic anterior spondylodesis with or without posterior stabilization of unstable incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: a prospective cohort study.胸腰椎连接部不稳定不完整爆裂骨折行胸腔镜前路融合与后路稳定与否的前瞻性队列研究:长期疗效观察。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 15;15(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01807-2.
5
Clinical Application of Ceramics in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Review and Update.陶瓷材料在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的临床应用:综述与更新
Global Spine J. 2017 Jun;7(4):343-349. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699201. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
6
PEEK cages versus PMMA spacers in anterior cervical discectomy: comparison of fusion, subsidence, sagittal alignment, and clinical outcome with a minimum 1-year follow-up.颈椎前路椎间盘切除术中聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯间隔物的比较:融合、下沉、矢状位对线及临床结果的比较,随访至少1年
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:398396. doi: 10.1155/2014/398396. Epub 2014 Jul 2.