Department Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Oct;30(7):908-15. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b236b0.
To determine whether a change in cochlear implant technology and electrode array design affects electrophysiological, behavioral, and functional measures of audition in pediatric cochlear implant users.
Prospective nonrandomized control study over 6 months postimplantation.
Tertiary referral pediatric hospital.
A total of 115 children using unilateral cochlear implants were included in this study. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: 1) 38 using the Nucleus 24M straight array device, 2) 20 using the perimodiolar Nucleus 24RCS Contour array, and 3) 57 using the perimodiolar Nucleus 24RE array with advance off stylet insertion. The mean ages at implantation were 4.85 +/- 4 (24M), 3.88 +/- 3.4 (24RCS), and 5.41 +/- 4.36 years (24RE; not significant, p > 0.05).
The electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and the electrically evoked stapedius reflex and behavioral measures of stimulation threshold were evoked by stimulation of basal, mid, and apical electrodes. These measures were completed at regular intervals over 6 to 12 months of implantation. Age-appropriate speech perception skills were also assessed during this period.
The 24RE array group had significantly lower ECAP and behavioral thresholds compared with the 24M and 24RCS array groups. The largest reductions of ECAP thresholds in the precurved array group were observed upon apical and basal electrode stimulation. Electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds were significantly higher in the 24RE group as compared with 24M and 24RCS groups. Comparing age-matched groups, open- and closed-set speech perception test scores were significantly higher in the 24RE array group.
The precurved Freedom 24RE cochlear implant potentially provides a wider range of stimulation levels and better functional results than the straight electrode 24M and the precurved 24RCS devices in profoundly hearing impaired children.
确定耳蜗植入技术和电极阵列设计的变化是否会影响儿童耳蜗植入使用者的听觉电生理、行为和功能测量。
植入后 6 个月的前瞻性非随机对照研究。
三级转诊儿科医院。
共有 115 名使用单侧耳蜗植入物的儿童参与了这项研究。受试者分为 3 组:1)38 名使用 Nucleus 24M 直阵列装置,2)20 名使用 Nucleus 24RCS Contour 近场阵列,3)57 名使用 Nucleus 24RE 近场阵列和 Advance off stylet 插入。植入时的平均年龄分别为 4.85±4 岁(24M)、3.88±3.4 岁(24RCS)和 5.41±4.36 岁(24RE;无显著差异,p>0.05)。
通过刺激基底、中间和顶部电极,引出电诱发复合动作电位(ECAP)和电诱发镫骨肌反射以及刺激阈值的行为测量。这些测量在植入后的 6 至 12 个月内定期完成。在此期间还评估了适合年龄的言语感知技能。
24RE 阵列组的 ECAP 和行为阈值明显低于 24M 和 24RCS 阵列组。在预弯曲阵列组中,ECAP 阈值的最大降低发生在顶部和底部电极刺激时。与 24M 和 24RCS 组相比,24RE 组的电诱发镫骨肌反射阈值明显较高。在年龄匹配的组中,24RE 阵列组的开放式和封闭式言语感知测试得分明显更高。
与直电极 24M 和预弯曲 24RCS 装置相比,预弯曲 Freedom 24RE 耳蜗植入物可为深度听力受损儿童提供更广泛的刺激水平和更好的功能结果。