Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Feb;38(2):173-84. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9355-8.
The objective of the current study was to evaluate how the inclusion of 3 Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) symptoms in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) diagnostic criteria influences the external validity of the ADHD subtypes. The sample comprised 228 children (166 boys, 62 girls) ranging in age from 5-18 years who were referred to clinics for attentional, behavioral, and/or learning problems and diagnosed with DSM-IV ADHD (124 Combined type, 81 Inattentive type, 23 Hyperactive-Impulsive type). Parent ratings of ADHD symptoms were obtained using the Emory Combined Rating Scale (ECRS), which assesses symptoms of the common DSM-IV childhood psychiatric disorders. Regression analyses incorporating planned comparisons were conducted to examine how the inclusion of SCT symptoms affects differences among ADHD subtypes on several external validity indicators (i.e., gender, age-of-onset, and overlapping conditions). The regression analyses did not yield any significant differences in gender ratios, mean age-The objective of the current study was to evaluate how the inclusion of 3 Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) symptoms in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) diagnostic criteria influences the external validity of the ADHD subtypes. The sample comprised 228 children (166 boys, 62 girls) ranging in age from 5-18 years who were referred to clinics for attentional, behavioral, and/or learning problems and diagnosed with DSM-IV ADHD (124 Combined type, 81 Inattentive type, 23 Hyperactive-Impulsive type). Parent ratings of ADHD symptoms were obtained using the Emory Combined Rating Scale (ECRS), which assesses symptoms of the common DSM-IV childhood psychiatric disorders. Regression analyses incorporating planned comparisons were conducted to examine how the inclusion of SCT symptoms affects differences among ADHD subtypes on several external validity indicators (i.e., gender, age-of-onset, and overlapping conditions). The regression analyses did not yield any significant differences in gender ratios, mean age-of- onset, or overlapping externalizing or internalizing problems when the ADHD Inattentive type was subdivided into high- versus low-SCT groups. In conclusion, the current results suggest that the inclusion of parent-reported SCT symptoms in the ADHD diagnostic criteria has limited utility for isolating diagnostically meaningful subgroups of the Inattentive type or for enhancing the external validity of the ADHD subtypes in clinic-referred samples.
本研究的目的是评估在 ADHD 诊断标准中纳入 3 种“迟钝认知速度”(SCT)症状如何影响 ADHD 亚型的外部有效性。该样本包括 228 名年龄在 5-18 岁之间的儿童(166 名男孩,62 名女孩),他们因注意力、行为和/或学习问题而被转介到诊所,并被诊断为 DSM-IV ADHD(124 名混合型、81 名注意力不集中型、23 名多动冲动型)。使用 Emory 综合评定量表(ECRS)获得 ADHD 症状的父母评定,该量表评估 DSM-IV 常见儿童精神障碍的症状。进行包含计划比较的回归分析,以检查在几个外部有效性指标(即性别、发病年龄和重叠病症)上纳入 SCT 症状如何影响 ADHD 亚型之间的差异。回归分析并未在性别比例、平均发病年龄或重叠的外部或内部问题方面产生任何显著差异,当将 ADHD 注意力不集中型细分为高 SCT 与低 SCT 组时。综上所述,目前的结果表明,在 ADHD 诊断标准中纳入父母报告的 SCT 症状对于分离出有意义的注意力不集中型诊断亚组或增强临床样本中 ADHD 亚型的外部有效性的作用有限。