National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Akadeemia tee 23, Tallinn 12618, Estonia.
Toxicology. 2010 Mar 10;269(2-3):105-19. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
For hazard assessment of NPs quantitative nanoecotoxicological data are required. The objective of this review was to evaluate the currently existing literature data on toxicity (L(E)C50 values) of synthetic NPs in environmentally relevant species in order to: (i) identify tentatively most harmful NPs and most sensitive organism groups, and (ii) to provide relevant ecotoxicological information for further risk assessment. The focus was set on selected synthetic NPs (nano TiO(2), nano ZnO, nano CuO, nano Ag, SWCNTs, MWCNs and C60-fullerenes) and organism groups representing main food-chain levels (bacteria, algae, crustaceans, ciliates, fish, yeasts and nematodes). Altogether 77 effect values were found, mostly for nano TiO(2) (31%), C60 (18%), nano ZnO (17%), nano Ag (13%), SWCNTs and nano CuO (both 9%). Only 3% of the available quantitative ecotoxicological information concerned MWCNTs. Organism-wise, 33% of the data concerned crustaceans, 27% bacteria, 14% algae and 13% fish. For all organism groups studied, solubility of CuO- and ZnO-NPs was a key factor in their aquatic toxicity. On the basis of the 34 median L(E)C50 values derived from 77 individual values, NPs were ranked according to their lowest median L(E)C50 value for the above described organism groups: the most harmful were nano Ag and nano ZnO that were classified "extremely toxic", (L(E)C50<0.1mg/l), followed by C60 fullerenes and nano CuO that were classified "very toxic", (L(E)C50 0.1-1mg/l). SWCNTs and MWCNTs were classified "toxic" (L(E)C50 1-10mg/l). Nano TiO(2) was classified as "harmful", (L(E)C50 10-100mg/l). Throughout, algae and crustaceans (daphnids) were most sensitive and thus probably most vulnerable organism groups in aquatic exposure to NPs. Very low L(E)C50 values should deserve thorough attention of environmental risk assessors for evaluation of the potential adverse effects of synthetic NPs on ecosystems. As the quantitative nanoecotoxicological data are still rare, further studies are needed.
对于纳米粒子的危害评估,需要定量的纳米生态毒理学数据。本综述的目的是评估目前有关合成纳米粒子在环境相关物种中的毒性(LC50 值)的文献数据,以便:(i)暂定确定最有害的纳米粒子和最敏感的生物群体,以及(ii)为进一步的风险评估提供相关的生态毒理学信息。研究重点放在选定的合成纳米粒子(纳米 TiO2、纳米 ZnO、纳米 CuO、纳米 Ag、单壁碳纳米管、多壁碳纳米管和 C60 富勒烯)和代表主要食物链水平的生物群体(细菌、藻类、甲壳类动物、纤毛虫、鱼类、酵母和线虫)上。共发现 77 个效应值,主要来自纳米 TiO2(31%)、C60(18%)、纳米 ZnO(17%)、纳米 Ag(13%)、SWCNTs 和纳米 CuO(均为 9%)。只有 3%的可用定量生态毒理学信息涉及 MWCNTs。就生物种类而言,33%的数据涉及甲壳类动物,27%的数据涉及细菌,14%的数据涉及藻类,13%的数据涉及鱼类。对于所有研究的生物群体,CuO 和 ZnO 纳米粒子的溶解度是其水生毒性的关键因素。基于从 77 个个体值中得出的 34 个中位数 LC50 值,根据上述生物群体的最低中位数 LC50 值对纳米粒子进行了排序:最有害的是纳米 Ag 和纳米 ZnO,被归类为“极毒”(LC50<0.1mg/l),其次是 C60 富勒烯和纳米 CuO,被归类为“剧毒”(LC50 0.1-1mg/l)。SWCNTs 和 MWCNTs 被归类为“有毒”(LC50 1-10mg/l)。纳米 TiO2 被归类为“有害”(LC50 10-100mg/l)。总的来说,藻类和甲壳类动物(水蚤)是水生暴露于纳米粒子时最敏感的,因此可能是最脆弱的生物群体。非常低的 LC50 值应该引起环境风险评估人员的充分关注,以评估合成纳米粒子对生态系统的潜在不利影响。由于定量纳米生态毒理学数据仍然很少,因此需要进一步研究。