• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 CT 结肠成像中 2D 和 3D 视图对扁平病变的评估。

Comparison of 2D and 3D views for evaluation of flat lesions in CT colonography.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2010 Jan;17(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2009.07.004
PMID:19734062
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Flat lesions in the colon may result in false-negative computed tomography colonography interpretations. It is unknown whether flat lesions are better measured on two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) images and which settings are optimal for enhanced reproducibility and decreased variability. We evaluated these factors to determine whether 2D or 3D is best for flat lesion measurements.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty-eight lesions in 66 patients from a previously published clinical trial were analyzed. Lesions were viewed with four methods including 2D at three window/level settings and 3D endoluminal view. Lesions in either supine or prone were counted as one dataset. Long axis and height were measured. Criteria of "height" (<or=3 mm high) or "ratio" (height <or=half the long axis) were applied. A subset of lesions was subject to inter- and intra-observer variability analysis.

RESULTS

With the "height" criterion, more datasets were classified as flat in 2D flat (n = 76), 2D soft tissue (n = 82), and 3D (n = 73) views than in the 2D lung (n = 49) view. If long axis is used as the key metric, endoluminal 3D (12.1%) views significantly showed the least inter-observer variability compared to lung (18.9%) or soft tissue (20.2%) views. Intra-observer variability was low overall for all methods.

CONCLUSION

When characterizing lesions as flat, a consistent viewing method should be used. To minimize inter-observer variability (such as when following a patient over time), it is best to use the ratio criterion for flat lesion definition incorporating the single longest dimension on 3D views as the key metric.

摘要

背景与目的

结肠扁平病变可能导致计算机断层结肠成像出现假阴性结果。目前尚不清楚在二维(2D)或三维(3D)图像上测量扁平病变时,哪种方法更好,以及哪种设置可实现最佳的可重复性和最小的变异性。我们评估了这些因素,以确定 2D 或 3D 哪种方法最适合扁平病变的测量。

方法和材料

分析了先前发表的临床试验中 66 名患者的 88 个病变。病变通过 4 种方法进行观察,包括 3 种窗宽/窗位的 2D 以及腔内 3D 视图。仰卧位或俯卧位的病变均视为一个数据集。测量长轴和高度。应用“高度”(<或=3 毫米高)或“比例”(高度<或=长轴的一半)标准进行病变分类。部分病变进行了观察者内和观察者间可变性分析。

结果

使用“高度”标准,与 2D 肺视图(n = 49)相比,更多的数据集在 2D 平坦视图(n = 76)、2D 软组织视图(n = 82)和 3D 视图(n = 73)中被归类为扁平病变。如果以长轴作为关键指标,腔内 3D 视图(12.1%)与肺(18.9%)或软组织(20.2%)视图相比,观察者间的变异性显著最小。所有方法的观察者内变异性总体较低。

结论

在对病变进行平坦特征描述时,应使用一致的观察方法。为了最小化观察者间的变异性(例如在随时间观察患者时),最好使用比例标准来定义扁平病变,将 3D 视图上的单个最长维度作为关键指标。

相似文献

1
Comparison of 2D and 3D views for evaluation of flat lesions in CT colonography.比较 CT 结肠成像中 2D 和 3D 视图对扁平病变的评估。
Acad Radiol. 2010 Jan;17(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Sep 5.
2
Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.透视文件视图的原发性三维分析与原发性二维分析:有症状患者在计算机断层结肠成像中由经验不足的阅片者进行病变检测的评估。
Acta Radiol. 2009 Apr;50(3):244-55. doi: 10.1080/02841850802714797.
3
Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.CT结肠成像的息肉测量:多读者、多工作站比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jan;188(1):122-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1535.
4
Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle.三维腔内计算机断层扫描结肠造影术的息肉检测:120度视野角单向飞扫的敏感性
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Jul-Aug;33(4):631-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31819778ea.
5
Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.CT结肠成像中线性息肉测量:二维与三维显示的体外和体内比较
Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):872-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2363041534.
6
Fecal-tagging CT colonography with structure-analysis electronic cleansing for detection of colorectal flat lesions.粪便标记 CT 结肠成像结合结构分析电子清洁技术检测结直肠平坦病变。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug;81(8):1712-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.051. Epub 2011 May 19.
7
Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.计算机辅助检测(CAD)作为CT结肠成像中使用透视滤线视图的第二阅片者:对经验不足阅片者性能的影响。
Clin Radiol. 2009 Oct;64(10):972-82. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
8
False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions.多排螺旋CT结肠成像的假阴性结果:漏诊病变原因的多变量分析
Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):495-502. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352040606. Epub 2005 Mar 15.
9
Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.CT 结肠成像中息肉大小和体积的比较:对后续 CT 结肠成像的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1561-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2618.
10
Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.单方向全景 3D 腔内解读技术与 CT 结肠成像中传统 2D 和双方向 3D 解读技术的比较:初步观察。
Clin Radiol. 2010 Feb;65(2):118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Overview of deep learning in medical imaging.医学成像中的深度学习概述。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2017 Sep;10(3):257-273. doi: 10.1007/s12194-017-0406-5. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
2
Quantitative radiology: automated measurement of polyp volume in computed tomography colonography using Hessian matrix-based shape extraction and volume growing.定量放射学:使用基于黑塞矩阵的形状提取和体积增长法在计算机断层扫描结肠造影中自动测量息肉体积
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2015 Oct;5(5):673-84. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2015.10.06.
3
Machine Learning in Computer-aided Diagnosis of the Thorax and Colon in CT: A Survey.
计算机断层扫描中胸部和结肠的计算机辅助诊断中的机器学习:一项综述。
IEICE Trans Inf Syst. 2013 Apr 1;E96-D(4):772-783. doi: 10.1587/transinf.e96.d.772.
4
A review of computer-aided diagnosis in thoracic and colonic imaging.计算机辅助诊断在胸部和结肠成像中的应用综述。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2012 Sep;2(3):163-76. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2012.09.02.
5
The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.CT 结肠成像术的第二次 ESGAR 共识声明。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar;23(3):720-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
6
Seeing is believing: video classification for computed tomographic colonography using multiple-instance learning.眼见为实:使用多实例学习对 CT 结肠成像进行视频分类。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 May;31(5):1141-53. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2187304.
7
Pixel-based machine learning in medical imaging.医学成像中基于像素的机器学习。
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012;2012:792079. doi: 10.1155/2012/792079. Epub 2012 Feb 28.