Tom's of Maine, Lafayette Center, Kennebunk, Maine, USA.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009 Sep;8(3):197-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2009.00449.x.
There is little scientific evidence to support the efficacy of natural deodorants and therefore, such products may be perceived as inefficacious. The evaluation of the in vitro antibacterial activity of a hop extract and the evaluation of the odor-reducing capacity of a hops/zinc ricinoleate-containing product by a sensory evaluation panel is employed to verify deodorant performance.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of a hop extract against Corynebacterium xerosis and Staphylococcus epidermidis and to verify in vivo deodorant performance of a hops/zinc ricinoleate-containing product.
The hops extract was evaluated on a culture of an armpit swab from six volunteers. Furthermore, the extract was submitted to a zone of inhibition test and an agar-dilution assay against two major odor-causing bacteria. The clinical evaluation of the finished product was carried out according to a standard method for substantiating deodorant efficacy using trained odor judges for the assessment of axillary malodor (ASTM method E 1207-87 Standard Practice for the Sensory Evaluation of Axillary Deodorancy).
The supercritical hops extract showed good antibacterial activities in all three tests. Minimum inhibitory concentration values of 6.25 and 25 mug/mL against C. xerosis and S. aureus, respectively, were obtained in the agar-dilution assay. In the clinical underarm odor-reduction evaluation, the mean malodor score dropped from 6.28 (+/-0.70) to 1.80 (+/-0.71) after 8 h of application. There was still a noticeable effect at both 12 and 24 h after the application, with a score of 1.82 (+/-0.74) and 2.24 (+/-0.77), respectively.
The hops extract has good in vitro antibacterial properties and, in combination with zinc ricinoleate in an appropriate base, delivers in vivo odor reduction. The clinical efficacy is likely due to a combination of the base ingredients and the antibacterial actives.
几乎没有科学证据支持天然体香剂的功效,因此,此类产品可能被认为无效。本研究采用体外抗菌活性评估和感官评估小组评估含啤酒花/锌蓖麻酸的产品的除臭能力,以验证体香剂的性能。
本研究旨在评估啤酒花提取物对干燥棒状杆菌和表皮葡萄球菌的体外抗菌活性,并验证含啤酒花/锌蓖麻酸产品的体内体香性能。
对 6 名志愿者腋窝拭子培养物进行啤酒花提取物评价。此外,对提取物进行抑菌圈试验和琼脂稀释试验,以评估两种主要致臭细菌。采用标准方法对成品进行临床评估,使用经过培训的气味评判员评估腋窝臭味(ASTM 方法 E 1207-87 腋窝除臭剂功效感官评估标准实践)。
超临界啤酒花提取物在所有三种测试中均表现出良好的抗菌活性。在琼脂稀释试验中,对干燥棒状杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的最小抑菌浓度值分别为 6.25 和 25 微克/毫升。在临床腋窝除臭评估中,应用 8 小时后,平均臭味评分从 6.28(+/-0.70)降至 1.80(+/-0.71)。应用后 12 小时和 24 小时仍有明显效果,评分分别为 1.82(+/-0.74)和 2.24(+/-0.77)。
啤酒花提取物具有良好的体外抗菌特性,与适当基质中的锌蓖麻酸结合,可实现体内除臭。临床疗效可能是基质成分和抗菌活性的共同作用。