• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
As the bell tolls: a foundation study on pancreatic cancer consumer's research priorities.钟声敲响:胰腺癌患者研究重点的基础研究
BMC Res Notes. 2009 Sep 9;2:179. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-179.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
Not sick enough: Experiences of carers of people with mental illness negotiating care for their relatives with mental health services.病情还不够严重:精神病患者照料者在与心理健康服务机构协商为其亲属提供护理时的经历。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):403-411. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12399.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
Consumers and Carers Versus Pharmacy Staff: Do Their Priorities for Australian Pharmacy Services Align?消费者和护理人员与药房工作人员:他们对澳大利亚药房服务的优先考虑是否一致?
Patient. 2015 Oct;8(5):411-22. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0105-9.
8
Who cares for the carers at hospital discharge at the end of life? A qualitative study of current practice in discharge planning and the potential value of using The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) Approach.临终关怀阶段,医院出院时谁来照顾护理人员?对现行出院计划实践的定性研究以及使用护理人员支持需求评估工具(CSNAT)方法的潜在价值。
Palliat Med. 2018 May;32(5):939-949. doi: 10.1177/0269216318756259. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
9
Patients and carer experiences of care provision after a diagnosis of lung cancer in Scotland.苏格兰肺癌确诊后患者及护理人员的护理体验。
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Mar;15(3):327-32. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0129-3. Epub 2006 Sep 2.
10
Therapy interventions for children with neurodisabilities: a qualitative scoping study.神经发育障碍儿童的治疗干预措施:定性范围研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jan;22(3):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta22030.

引用本文的文献

1
Supportive Care Needs and Related Interventions in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer and Their Informal Caregivers: A Scoping Review.胰腺癌患者及其非正式照护者的支持性护理需求及相关干预措施:一项范围综述
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Apr 16;56(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01218-8.
2
Stepped-wedge clinical trials in pancreatic cancer: a step backward in improving overall survival or a leap forward to enhance quality of care?胰腺癌的阶梯楔形临床试验:是在改善总生存期方面的倒退,还是在提高医疗质量方面的飞跃?
Gland Surg. 2025 Feb 28;14(2):263-267. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-472. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
3
The psychosocial impact of pancreatic cancer on caregivers: a scoping review.胰腺癌对护理人员的社会心理影响:一项范围综述。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13891-w.
4
Caregivers' demands: caring atmosphere expected by cancer patients' caregivers-a qualitative content analysis.照顾者的需求:癌症患者照顾者期望的关怀氛围——一项定性内容分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 May 27;32(6):389. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08575-3.
5
Co-design and evaluation of a digital serious game to promote public awareness about pancreatic cancer.共同设计和评估一款数字严肃游戏,以提高公众对胰腺癌的认识。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18050-7.
6
Patient and public involvement in cancer research: A scoping review.患者和公众参与癌症研究:范围综述。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15530-15543. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6200. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer.系统综述:胰腺癌患者的非专业照护者的负担、未满足的需求和生活质量。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec 22;31(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07468-7.
8
Pancreatic cancer and supportive care--pancreatic exocrine insufficiency negatively impacts on quality of life.胰腺癌和支持性治疗——胰腺外分泌功能不全对生活质量有负面影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jul;21(7):1835-41. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1729-3. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
9
Towards meeting the research needs of Australian cancer consumers.以满足澳大利亚癌症患者的研究需求。
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Dec 3;5:667. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-667.

本文引用的文献

1
Does age really matter? Recall of information presented to newly referred patients with cancer.年龄真的重要吗?对新转诊癌症患者所提供信息的回忆。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;26(33):5450-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2322. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
2
Analysis of mortality rates for pancreatic cancer across the world.全球胰腺癌死亡率分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(1):58-62. doi: 10.1080/13651820701883148.
3
What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men.对男性有效的方法是什么?针对男性的健康促进干预措施的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jul 3;8:141. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-141.
4
Obesity, pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer.肥胖、胰腺炎与胰腺癌。
Obes Surg. 2008 Sep;18(9):1183-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9599-3. Epub 2008 Jun 19.
5
Detecting pathway-based gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in pancreatic cancer.检测胰腺癌中基于通路的基因-基因和基因-环境相互作用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jun;17(6):1470-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2797.
6
Communicating a terminal prognosis in a palliative care setting: deficiencies in current communication training protocols.在姑息治疗环境中传达终末期预后:当前沟通培训方案的不足之处
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jun;66(11):2356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.042. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
7
Patient attitudes, behaviours, and other factors considered by doctors when estimating cancer patients' anxiety and desire for information.医生在评估癌症患者的焦虑程度和信息需求时所考虑的患者态度、行为及其他因素。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2007 Dec;21(4):523-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00507.x.
8
Risk factors for pancreatic cancer: case-control study.胰腺癌的危险因素:病例对照研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec;102(12):2696-707. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01510.x. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
9
Operationalising a model framework for consumer and community participation in health and medical research.实施一个消费者和社区参与健康与医学研究的模型框架。
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Jun 26;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-13.
10
Beyond scientific rigour: funding cancer research of public value.超越科学严谨性:资助具有公共价值的癌症研究。
Health Policy. 2007 Dec;84(2-3):234-42. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 Jun 15.

钟声敲响:胰腺癌患者研究重点的基础研究

As the bell tolls: a foundation study on pancreatic cancer consumer's research priorities.

作者信息

Saunders Carla, Gooden Helen, Robotin Monica, Mumford Jan

机构信息

School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Wallsend NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2009 Sep 9;2:179. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-179.

DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-2-179
PMID:19740445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2756279/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is the first investigation of its kind to explore the views of people affected by pancreatic cancer with regard to research priorities. Pancreatic cancer has an extremely poor outlook in terms of early diagnosis, effective treatment and survival. Those affected by the disease generally lack opportunities to voice their needs or concerns in an organised manner, link with others affected by the condition and take part in research.

METHODS

This qualitative study adopts a self-selected telephone focussed discussion group approach. Information was obtained from distinct carer and patient groups after adequate controls such as the 'safe space' technique (repeatedly enquiring on and respecting the emotional needs) were implemented to protect participants from undue physical and psychological distress.

RESULTS

Five themes emerged overall, with three themes being common between the patients and carers groups. Early detection, clinician communication and public awareness were areas of recurring discussion and consensus for both groups. The fourth theme to emerge for the patient group centred on quality of care, while the fourth theme of the carer group focused on the need for more and improved treatment options.

CONCLUSION

Research priorities for pancreatic cancer consumers have been identified via an investigation that was tailored to meet exceptional needs. This research gives us a primary understanding of the role that pancreatic cancer patients can play in identifying areas of research that are responsive to their needs and priorities when suitably planned. Importantly it also provides a much greater understanding of the grim realities of the disease for those affected. This work is likely to be of value to anyone planning to work with those with a time limited, challenging condition.

摘要

背景

这是同类研究中首次探索胰腺癌患者对于研究重点的看法。胰腺癌在早期诊断、有效治疗和生存方面前景极差。受该疾病影响的人群通常缺乏以有组织的方式表达自身需求或担忧、与其他患者建立联系以及参与研究的机会。

方法

这项定性研究采用了自我选择的电话焦点讨论组方法。在实施了诸如“安全空间”技术(反复询问并尊重情感需求)等适当控制措施以保护参与者免受过度的身体和心理困扰后,从不同的护理人员和患者群体中获取了信息。

结果

总体上出现了五个主题,其中三个主题在患者和护理人员群体中是共有的。早期检测、与临床医生的沟通以及公众意识是两组反复讨论并达成共识的领域。患者群体出现的第四个主题围绕护理质量,而护理人员群体的第四个主题则侧重于需要更多且更好的治疗选择。

结论

通过一项针对特殊需求进行定制的调查,确定了胰腺癌患者对于研究重点的看法。这项研究让我们初步了解到,在经过适当规划后,胰腺癌患者在确定符合其需求和优先事项的研究领域时可以发挥的作用。重要的是,它还让我们更深入地了解了该疾病给患者带来的严峻现实。这项工作可能会对任何计划与患有这种时间有限且具有挑战性疾病的患者合作的人有价值。