• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记忆提取过程中的注意力会增强未来的记忆能力。

Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering.

作者信息

Dudukovic Nicole M, Dubrow Sarah, Wagner Anthony D

机构信息

Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct;37(7):953-61. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.953.

DOI:10.3758/MC.37.7.953
PMID:19744935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2776078/
Abstract

Memory retrieval is a powerful learning event that influences whether an experience will be remembered in the future. Although retrieval can succeed in the presence of distraction, dividing attention during retrieval may reduce the power of remembering as an encoding event. In the present experiments, participants studied pictures of objects under full attention and then engaged in item recognition and source memory retrieval under full or divided attention. Two days later, a second recognition and source recollection test assessed the impact of attention during initial retrieval on long-term retention. On this latter test, performance was superior for items that had been tested initially under full versus divided attention. More importantly, even when items were correctly recognized on the first test, divided attention reduced the likelihood of subsequent recognition on the second test. The same held true for source recollection. Additionally, foils presented during the first test were also less likely to be later recognized if they had been encountered initially under divided attention. These findings demonstrate that attentive retrieval is critical for learning through remembering.

摘要

记忆提取是一个强大的学习事件,它会影响一段经历在未来是否会被记住。虽然在有干扰的情况下提取也可能成功,但在提取过程中分散注意力可能会降低记忆作为一种编码事件的效力。在本实验中,参与者在全神贯注的状态下研究物体的图片,然后在全神贯注或注意力分散的情况下进行项目识别和源记忆提取。两天后,第二次识别和源回忆测试评估了初始提取过程中的注意力对长期记忆的影响。在这后一次测试中,最初在全神贯注而非注意力分散的情况下进行测试的项目表现更优。更重要的是,即使在第一次测试中项目被正确识别,注意力分散也会降低在第二次测试中后续识别的可能性。源回忆也是如此。此外,如果在第一次测试中呈现的陪衬物最初是在注意力分散的情况下遇到的,那么它们在之后被识别的可能性也较小。这些发现表明,专注的提取对于通过记忆进行学习至关重要。

相似文献

1
Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering.记忆提取过程中的注意力会增强未来的记忆能力。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct;37(7):953-61. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.953.
2
Variations in constrained retrieval.约束检索的变化。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Jul;40(5):681-92. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0185-5.
3
Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.自动加工影响自由回忆:来自加工分离程序和再认-确信判断的会聚证据。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Apr;39(3):389-402. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0040-5.
4
Divided attention: an undesirable difficulty in memory retention.注意力分散:记忆保留的一个不良困难。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Oct;41(7):978-88. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0326-5.
5
Spatial recall improved by retrieval enactment.通过检索演练,空间记忆得到改善。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Jun;16(3):524-8. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.524.
6
A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.熟悉度在支持测试效应随时间的推移中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107298. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107298. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
7
Selective attention meets spontaneous recognition memory: Evidence for effects at retrieval.选择性注意与自发识别记忆:检索时效应的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar;49:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
8
The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists.学习与测试时分散注意力对错误识别的影响:DRM 列表与分类列表的比较
Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):1954-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03192928.
9
Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.注意分散会降低编码时对分心的抵抗,但不会降低检索时的抵抗。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1268-1273. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1210-7.
10
Effects of negative emotion on neural correlates of item and source memory during encoding and retrieval.负性情绪对项目和来源记忆在编码和提取过程中神经相关物的影响。
Brain Res. 2019 Sep 1;1718:32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationships between age, fMRI correlates of familiarity and familiarity-based memory performance under single and dual task conditions.年龄、fMRI 熟悉度相关指标与单任务和双任务条件下熟悉度记忆表现之间的关系。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Oct 10;189:108670. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108670. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
2
Errorless, Errorful, and Retrieval Practice for Naming Treatment in Aphasia: A Scoping Review of Learning Mechanisms and Treatment Ingredients.无错误、有错误和检索练习在命名治疗中的作用:失语症学习机制和治疗成分的范围综述。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Feb 13;66(2):668-687. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00251. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.测试记忆的力量:基础研究及其对教育实践的启示。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;1(3):181-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x.
2
The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists.学习与测试时分散注意力对错误识别的影响:DRM 列表与分类列表的比较
Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):1954-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03192928.
3
HMMTree: a computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models.
The route to recall a dream: theoretical considerations and methodological implications.
回忆梦境的途径:理论思考与方法学启示。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):964-987. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01722-7. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
4
Evaluating the Consistency of Subjective Activity Assessments and Their Relation to Cognition in Older Adults.评估老年人主观活动评估的一致性及其与认知的关系。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;6(3):74. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6030074.
5
Can the Testing Effect for General Knowledge Facts Be Influenced by Distraction due to Divided Attention or Experimentally Induced Anxious Mood?一般知识事实的测试效应会受到因注意力分散或实验诱发的焦虑情绪导致的干扰影响吗?
Front Psychol. 2019 May 3;10:969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00969. eCollection 2019.
6
Congruency Encoding Effects on Recognition Memory: A Stage-Specific Account of Desirable Difficulty.一致性编码对识别记忆的影响:理想难度的阶段特异性解释。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 24;10:858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00858. eCollection 2019.
7
The dynamic interplay between acute psychosocial stress, emotion and autobiographical memory.急性心理社会应激、情绪和自传体记忆之间的动态相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 6;8(1):8684. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26890-8.
8
Alpha Oscillations during Incidental Encoding Predict Subsequent Memory for New "Foil" Information.偶然编码期间的 Alpha 振荡预测后续对新“干扰”信息的记忆。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 May;30(5):667-679. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01234. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
9
Mindfulness Enhances Episodic Memory Performance: Evidence from a Multimethod Investigation.正念增强情景记忆表现:来自多方法调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 26;11(4):e0153309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153309. eCollection 2016.
10
The formation of source memory under distraction.分心状态下源记忆的形成。
Behav Brain Funct. 2014 Oct 24;10:40. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-10-40.
HMMTree:一种用于潜在类别分层多项处理树模型的计算机程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):267-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03193157.
4
Interfering with remembering and knowing: effects of divided attention at retrieval.干扰记忆与知晓:提取时注意力分散的影响
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
5
The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.再认记忆中的测试效应:一种双加工解释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):431-7. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.431.
6
Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.探索记忆提取过程中注意力的作用:语义编码和分散注意力的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):986-98. doi: 10.3758/bf03193246.
7
Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: depth of retrieval.识别与源记忆中的认知控制模式:检索深度
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):852-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196776.
8
Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.测试强化学习:进行记忆测试可提高长期记忆保持能力。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.
9
The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.多项选择题测试的正负后果。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1155-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1155.
10
Generation and memory for contextual detail.情境细节的生成与记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jul;30(4):838-55. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.838.