• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动加工影响自由回忆:来自加工分离程序和再认-确信判断的会聚证据。

Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1876, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2011 Apr;39(3):389-402. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0040-5.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-010-0040-5
PMID:21264598
Abstract

Dual-process theories of retrieval suggest that controlled and automatic processing contribute to memory performance. Free recall tests are often considered pure measures of recollection, assessing only the controlled process. We report two experiments demonstrating that automatic processes also influence free recall. Experiment 1 used inclusion and exclusion tasks to estimate recollection and automaticity in free recall, adopting a new variant of the process dissociation procedure. Dividing attention during study selectively reduced the recollection estimate but did not affect the automatic component. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of Experiment 1, and subjects additionally reported remember-know-guess judgments during recall in the inclusion condition. In the latter task, dividing attention during study reduced remember judgments for studied items, but know responses were unaffected. Results from both methods indicated that free recall is partly driven by automatic processes. Thus, we conclude that retrieval in free recall tests is not driven solely by conscious recollection (or remembering) but also by automatic influences of the same sort believed to drive priming on implicit memory tests. Sometimes items come to mind without volition in free recall.

摘要

双加工理论认为,控制加工和自动加工都对记忆表现有贡献。自由回忆测试通常被认为是纯粹的再认测量,只评估控制加工。我们报告了两项实验,证明了自动加工也会影响自由回忆。实验 1 使用包含和排除任务来估计自由回忆中的再认和自动性,采用了过程分离程序的一种新变体。在学习期间分散注意力会选择性地降低再认估计,但不会影响自动成分。在实验 2 中,我们复制了实验 1 的结果,并且在包含条件下,被试在回忆期间还报告了记得-知道-猜测判断。在后者的任务中,在学习期间分散注意力会减少对学习项目的记得判断,但知道反应不受影响。两种方法的结果都表明,自由回忆部分是由自动加工驱动的。因此,我们得出结论,自由回忆测试中的提取不仅受有意识的再认(或记住)驱动,而且还受自动加工的影响,这种自动加工被认为会驱动内隐记忆测试中的启动。有时候,在自由回忆中,有些项目会不由自主地出现在脑海中。

相似文献

1
Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.自动加工影响自由回忆:来自加工分离程序和再认-确信判断的会聚证据。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Apr;39(3):389-402. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0040-5.
2
Binding of multidimensional context information as a distinctive characteristic of remember judgments.多维情境信息的绑定作为记忆判断的一个显著特征。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):32-49. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.32.
3
Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past.记忆与知晓:通向个人过往的两种途径。
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jan;21(1):89-102. doi: 10.3758/bf03211168.
4
The role of extralist associations in false remembering: a source misattribution account.额外列表关联在错误记忆中的作用:一种源错误归因解释。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Mar;37(2):130-42. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.2.130.
5
Animacy enhances recollection but not familiarity: Convergent evidence from the remember-know-guess paradigm and the process-dissociation procedure.有生命性增强回忆但不增强熟悉感:来自再认-知道-猜测范式和加工分离程序的会聚证据。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Jan;51(1):143-159. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01339-6. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
6
A comparison of the multimemory and detection theories of know and remember recognition judgments.“知道”与“记得”识别判断的多记忆与检测理论比较。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1197-210. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1197.
7
Remember and know judgments during recognition in chronic schizophrenia.慢性精神分裂症识别过程中的记忆与认知判断。
Schizophr Res. 2008 Mar;100(1-3):181-90. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.09.021. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
8
On the validity of remember-know judgments: evidence from think aloud protocols.关于再认判断的有效性:来自出声思维报告的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1625-33. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
9
On interpreting the relationship between remember-know judgments and confidence: the role of instructions.论记忆知晓判断与信心之间关系的解读:指导语的作用
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Sep;18(3):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 May 23.
10
Different definitions of the nonrecollection-based response option(s) change how people use the "remember" response in the remember/know paradigm.不同的无法回忆反应选项的定义改变了人们在“记得/知道”范式中使用“记得”反应的方式。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct;47(7):1359-1374. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00938-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroscientist's Behavioral Toolbox for Studying Episodic-Like Memory.神经科学家研究类情节记忆的行为工具包。
eNeuro. 2024 Aug 30;11(8). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0073-24.2024. Print 2024 Aug.
2
Adult age differences in subjective context retrieval in dual-list free recall.成人在双列表自由回忆中主观语境检索的年龄差异。
Memory. 2023 Feb;31(2):218-233. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2139846. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
3
Recallable but not recognizable: The influence of semantic priming in recall paradigms.可召回但不可识别:在回忆范式中语义启动的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Recollection and familiarity in amnesic mild cognitive impairment.遗忘型轻度认知障碍中的再认和熟悉感。
Neuropsychology. 2010 May;24(3):316-26. doi: 10.1037/a0017654.
2
Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.协作记忆中的年龄差异:提取操作的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct;37(7):962-75. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.962.
3
The role of extralist associations in false remembering: a source misattribution account.额外列表关联在错误记忆中的作用:一种源错误归因解释。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb;21(1):119-143. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00854-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Disrupters as Well as Monitors: Roles of Others During and After Collaborative Remembering in the DRM Procedure.破坏者与监督者:在DRM程序中协同记忆期间及之后他人所起的作用
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2019 Nov 14;15(4):276-289. doi: 10.5709/acp-0275-1. eCollection 2019.
5
Longitudinal socioemotional pathways between retrospective early life maternal relationship quality and episodic memory in older adulthood.回顾性早期母婴关系质量与老年期情景记忆之间的纵向社会情感途径。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Nov;55(11):2464-2473. doi: 10.1037/dev0000805. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
A Remember/Know Examination of Free-recall Reveals Dissociative Roles of Item- and Context-Information over Time.自由回忆的再认测验揭示了项目和情境信息在时间上的分离作用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 10;8(1):13493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31401-w.
7
Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall.记忆提取焦点中的年龄差异:来自双列表自由回忆的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Dec;30(4):768-80. doi: 10.1037/pag0000049. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
8
Category cued recall evokes a generate-recognize retrieval process.类别线索回忆引发了一个生成-识别检索过程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Mar;42(3):339-50. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000136. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
9
Long-Term Recency in Anterograde Amnesia.顺行性遗忘中的长期近因效应。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 5;10(6):e0124084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124084. eCollection 2015.
10
Training recollection in healthy older adults: clear improvements on the training task, but little evidence of transfer.健康老年人的训练回忆:训练任务有明显改善,但几乎没有迁移的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Nov 18;8:898. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00898. eCollection 2014.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Mar;37(2):130-42. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.2.130.
4
Recognition memory measures yield disproportionate effects of aging on learning face-name associations.识别记忆测量结果显示,衰老对学习面孔与名字关联的影响不成比例。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):657-64. doi: 10.1037/a0013008.
5
Internally generated reactivation of single neurons in human hippocampus during free recall.自由回忆期间人类海马体中单个神经元的内源性再激活。
Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):96-101. doi: 10.1126/science.1164685. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
6
Recognition memory for valenced and arousing materials under conditions of divided attention.在注意力分散条件下对有情感效价和唤起性材料的识别记忆。
Memory. 2008;16(5):530-7. doi: 10.1080/09658210802007493.
7
A disproportionate role for the fornix and mammillary bodies in recall versus recognition memory.穹窿和乳头体在回忆与识别记忆中发挥的作用不均衡。
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jul;11(7):834-42. doi: 10.1038/nn.2149. Epub 2008 Jun 15.
8
Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.记忆/知晓判断探究回忆程度。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):400-5. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20041.
9
Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.物体及其位置记忆中的性别差异:关于自动与控制编码及检索情境的一项研究
Brain Cogn. 2008 Apr;66(3):232-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
10
Inadvertent plagiarism in young and older adults: the role of working memory capacity in reducing memory errors.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Mar;35(2):231-41. doi: 10.3758/bf03193444.