Farkouh Michael E, Aneja Ashish, Reeder Guy S, Smars Peter A, Bansilal Sameer, Lennon Ryan J, Wiste Heather J, Razzouk Louai, Traverse Kay, Holmes David R, Mathew Verghese
From Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (GSR, DRH, VM), Division of Emergency Medical Services and Internal Medicine (PAS), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (RJL, HJW), and Section of Health Services Evaluation (KT), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota; and Mount Sinai School of Medicine Cardiovascular Institute (MEF, AA, SB, LR), New York, New York.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2009 Sep;88(5):307-313. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181b98782.
The long-term cardiovascular outcomes of a population-based cohort presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain and classified with a clinical risk stratification algorithm are not well documented. The Olmsted County Chest Pain Study is a community-based study that included all consecutive patients presenting with chest pain consistent with unstable angina presenting to all EDs in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Patients were classified according to the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) criteria. Patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and chest pain of noncardiac origin were excluded. Main outcome measures were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days and at a median follow-up of 7.3 years, and mortality through a median of 16.6 years.The 2271 patients were classified as follows: 436 (19.2%) as high risk, 1557 (68.6%) as intermediate risk, and 278 (12.2%) as low risk. Thirty-day MACCE occurred in 11.5% in the high-risk group, 6.2% in the intermediate-risk group, and 2.5% in the low-risk group (p < 0.001). At 7.3 years, significantly more MACCE were recorded in the intermediate-risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.33-2.75) and high-risk groups (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.67-3.58). Intermediate- and high-risk patients demonstrated a 1.38-fold (95% CI, 0.95-2.01; p = 0.09) and a 1.68-fold (95% CI, 1.13-2.50; p = 0.011) higher mortality, respectively, compared to low-risk patients at 16.6 years. At 7.3 and at 16.6 years of follow-up, biomarkers were not incrementally predictive of cardiovascular risk.In conclusion, a widely applicable rapid clinical algorithm using AHCPR criteria can reliably predict long-term mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. This algorithm, when applied in the ED, affords an excellent opportunity to identify patients who might benefit from a more aggressive cardiovascular risk factor management strategy.
对于因胸痛前往急诊科(ED)就诊并采用临床风险分层算法进行分类的人群队列,其长期心血管结局尚无充分记录。奥尔姆斯特德县胸痛研究是一项基于社区的研究,纳入了明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县所有急诊科中所有连续出现符合不稳定型心绞痛胸痛症状的患者。患者根据医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)标准进行分类。排除了ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者和非心脏源性胸痛患者。主要结局指标为30天时以及中位随访7.3年时的主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE),以及中位随访16.6年时的死亡率。2271例患者分类如下:436例(19.2%)为高危,1557例(68.6%)为中危,278例(12.2%)为低危。高危组30天MACCE发生率为11.5%,中危组为6.2%,低危组为2.5%(p<0.001)。在7.3年时,中危组(风险比[HR],1.91;95%置信区间[CI],1.33 - 2.75)和高危组(HR,2.45;95%CI,1.67 - 3.58)记录到的MACCE显著更多。在16.6年时,与低危患者相比,中危和高危患者的死亡率分别高出1.38倍(95%CI,0.95 - 2.01;p = 0.09)和1.68倍(95%CI,1.13 - 2.50;p = 0.011)。在7.3年和16.6年的随访中,生物标志物并不能逐步预测心血管风险。
总之,使用AHCPR标准的广泛适用的快速临床算法能够可靠地预测长期死亡率和心血管结局。该算法应用于急诊科时,为识别可能从更积极的心血管危险因素管理策略中获益的患者提供了绝佳机会。