• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寒风使观众们感到寒冷,但酒只是变凉了:意义、结构和句子理解。

The wind chilled the spectators, but the wine just chilled: Sense, structure, and sentence comprehension.

作者信息

Hare Mary, Elman Jeffrey L, Tabaczynski Tracy, McRae Ken

机构信息

Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar 31;33(4):610-628. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01027.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01027.x
PMID:19750146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2742476/
Abstract

Anticipation plays a role in language comprehension. In this article, we explore the extent to which verb sense influences expectations about upcoming structure. We focus on change of state verbs like shatter, which have different senses that are expressed in either transitive or intransitive structures, depending on the sense that is used. In two experiments we influence the interpretation of verb sense by manipulating the thematic fit of the grammatical subject as cause or affected entity for the verb, and test whether readers' expectations for a transitive or intransitive structure change as a result. This sense-biasing context influenced reading times in the post-verbal regions. Reading times for transitive sentences were faster following good-cause than good theme subjects, but the opposite pattern was found for intransitive sentences. We conclude that readers use sense-contingent subcategorization preferences during on-line comprehension.

摘要

预期在语言理解中发挥着作用。在本文中,我们探究动词语义对即将出现的句子结构的预期产生影响的程度。我们聚焦于像“shatter”这样的状态变化动词,这类动词具有不同的语义,根据所使用的语义,它们可以用及物结构或不及物结构来表达。在两个实验中,我们通过操纵语法主语作为动词的致使者或受影响实体的题元适配性来影响动词语义的解读,并测试读者对及物或不及物结构的预期是否因此而改变。这种语义偏向语境影响了动词后区域的阅读时间。及物句子在致使者合适的主语之后的阅读时间比题元合适的主语之后更快,但不及物句子则发现了相反的模式。我们得出结论,读者在在线理解过程中会使用与语义相关的次范畴化偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cdf/2742476/3c2a18170f9e/nihms-92112-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cdf/2742476/13b979b6875d/nihms-92112-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cdf/2742476/3c2a18170f9e/nihms-92112-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cdf/2742476/13b979b6875d/nihms-92112-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cdf/2742476/3c2a18170f9e/nihms-92112-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The wind chilled the spectators, but the wine just chilled: Sense, structure, and sentence comprehension.寒风使观众们感到寒冷,但酒只是变凉了:意义、结构和句子理解。
Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar 31;33(4):610-628. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01027.x.
2
Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs.听众在线利用句法结构将其词汇搜索限制在动词的一个子类上。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 15;6:1841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01841. eCollection 2015.
3
Evaluating the Construct Validity of Sentence-Focused Diversity Measures With Late-Talking Toddlers and Same-Age Peers.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Apr 8;68(4):1886-1901. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00558. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
4
Verb Transitivity Bias Affects On-line Sentence Reading in People with Aphasia.动词及物性偏向影响失语症患者的在线句子阅读。
Aphasiology. 2013 Mar 1;27(3):326-343. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.725243. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
5
L2 Learners Do Not Ignore Verb's Subcategorization Information in Real-Time Syntactic Processing.二语学习者在实时句法处理中不会忽略动词的次范畴化信息。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 20;12:689137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689137. eCollection 2021.
6
The relationship between verb meaning and argument realization: What we learn from the processing of agent-implying intransitive verbs in Japanese.动词意义与论元实现之间的关系:我们从日语中隐含施事的不及物动词的处理中学到了什么。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 1;13:928649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928649. eCollection 2022.
7
Sentence comprehension in Slovak-speaking patients with Alzheimer's disease.斯洛伐克语阿尔茨海默病患者的句子理解能力
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jul;52(4):456-468. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12284. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
8
Assessment of verb and sentence processing deficits in stroke-induced aphasia: the Italian version of the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS-I).中风所致失语症中动词和句子加工缺陷的评估:《西北动词与句子评估量表》意大利语版(NAVS-I)
Aphasiology. 2024;38(3):510-543. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2215494. Epub 2023 May 25.
9
Counting the nouns: simple structural cues to verb meaning.数名词:动词意义的简单结构线索。
Child Dev. 2012 Jul-Aug;83(4):1382-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01783.x. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
Transitivity and non-uniform subjecthood in agreement attraction.及物性与非一致主语在一致吸引中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Apr;52(3):536-553. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01482-8. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of world knowledge on the prediction of upcoming verbs: an eye-tracking study.世界知识对预测后续动词的影响:一项眼动研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Dec;51(6):1335-1345. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09900-9. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
2
Access to verb bias and plausibility information during syntactic processing in adult Spanish-English bilinguals.成年西班牙语-英语双语者在句法处理过程中对动词偏向和合理性信息的获取。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2022 May;25(3):417-429. doi: 10.1017/s1366728921000924. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
3
Complement Coercion: The Joint Effects of Type and Typicality.

本文引用的文献

1
Activating event knowledge.激活事件知识
Cognition. 2009 May;111(2):151-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
2
Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension.语音典型性对在线句子理解有影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12203-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602173103. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
3
Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.预测语篇中即将出现的单词:来自事件相关电位和阅读时间的证据。
补语强制:类型与典型性的联合效应
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 24;8:1987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01987. eCollection 2017.
4
Agents and Patients in Physical Settings: Linguistic Cues Affect the Assignment of Causality in German and Tongan.物理环境中的施事和受事:语言线索对德语和汤加语中因果关系归属的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 7;8:1093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01093. eCollection 2017.
5
Verb biases are shaped through lifelong learning.动词偏好是通过终身学习形成的。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 May;43(5):781-794. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000341. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
6
Salience and Attention in Surprisal-Based Accounts of Language Processing.基于意外值的语言处理理论中的显著性与注意力
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 6;7:844. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00844. eCollection 2016.
7
Hemispheric asymmetry in event knowledge activation during incremental language comprehension: A visual half-field ERP study.增量语言理解过程中事件知识激活的半球不对称性:一项视觉半视野ERP研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:252-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
8
Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs.听众在线利用句法结构将其词汇搜索限制在动词的一个子类上。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 15;6:1841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01841. eCollection 2015.
9
Comprehending the impossible: what role do selectional restriction violations play?理解不可能之事:选择限制违背起到了什么作用?
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Oct 1;30(8):932-939. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1047458. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
10
Grammatical number processing and anticipatory eye movements are not tightly coordinated in English spoken language comprehension.在英语口语理解中,语法数的处理与预期眼动并未紧密协调。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 7;6:590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00590. eCollection 2015.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):443-67. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443.
4
Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):432-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03195591.
5
Précis of Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution.《语言的基础:大脑、意义、语法、进化》概要
Behav Brain Sci. 2003 Dec;26(6):651-65; discussion 666-707. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x03000153.
6
When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect.听众何时以及如何将一个句子与更广泛的语篇联系起来?来自N400效应的证据。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Oct;17(3):701-18. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00196-4.
7
Meaning through syntax: language comprehension and the reduced relative clause construction.句法中的意义:语言理解与简化关系从句结构
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):490-525. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.490.
8
Event templates in the lexical representations of verbs.动词词汇表征中的事件模板。
Cogn Psychol. 2002 Aug;45(1):1-44. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00004-x.
9
Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.句子理解过程中动词信息使用的局限性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Mar;8(1):132-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196149.
10
Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.句子处理中特定动词的限制:区分词汇偏好与花园路径效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 May;19(3):528-53. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.528.