Zimmermann Camilla, Burman Debika, Follwell Matthew, Wakimoto Kristina, Seccareccia Dori, Bryson John, Le Lisa W, Rodin Gary
Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010 May;27(3):175-81. doi: 10.1177/1049909109346307. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
We examined determinants of symptom severity and response to treatment among 150 patients with cancer participating in a phase II trial of a palliative care team intervention. Patients completed a modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) at baseline and 1 week. Women had a worse baseline ESAS Distress Score (EDS; P = .003) and Total Distress Score (TDS; P = .005); differences were particularly marked for anxiety and appetite. Performance status was inversely associated with EDS, TDS, well-being, appetite, and fatigue (Kruskal-Wallis, all P < .005). Multivariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that symptom improvement was independently predicted by worse baseline EDS score and female gender. Performance status, gender, and baseline symptom severity should be accounted for in trials of palliative care interventions; inclusion criteria based on symptom severity should also be considered.
我们在150名参与姑息治疗团队干预II期试验的癌症患者中,研究了症状严重程度的决定因素及对治疗的反应。患者在基线和1周时完成了一份改良的埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)。女性的基线ESAS痛苦评分(EDS;P = 0.003)和总痛苦评分(TDS;P = 0.005)更差;焦虑和食欲方面的差异尤为明显。体能状态与EDS、TDS、幸福感、食欲和疲劳呈负相关(Kruskal-Wallis检验,所有P < 0.005)。多变量协方差分析(ANCOVA)表明,基线EDS评分更差和女性性别可独立预测症状改善。在姑息治疗干预试验中应考虑体能状态、性别和基线症状严重程度;还应考虑基于症状严重程度的纳入标准。