Department of Radiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2009;8(3):101-5. doi: 10.2463/mrms.8.101.
We compared the image quality of SPACE (sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions) and conventional 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 1.5 tesla with regard to difference in echo spacing.
Twenty healthy volunteers prospectively underwent navigator-triggered SPACE and 3D TSE MRCP at 1.5T with identical parameters, except for echo spacing. Quantitative analyses of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), relative contrast, and contour sharpness index of each segment of the pancreaticobiliary tree were compared using paired t-tests. Qualitative analyses on a 5-point scale (1, excellent; 5, poor) scored by 2 independent radiologists were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
The SNR, CNR, and contour sharpness index of each segment were significantly better for the SPACE sequence than 3D TSE (P < 0.05). Relative contrast and subjective image quality were not significantly different (P > 0.05).
We verified SPACE MRCP quantitatively superior to conventional 3D TSE MRCP at 1.5T as a result of shortening of echo spacing.
我们比较了在 1.5T 场强下,SPACE(应用不同翻转角梯度的采样完美技术与优化对比应用)和常规三维 turbo 自旋回波(TSE)磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)在回波间距差异方面的图像质量。
20 名健康志愿者前瞻性地接受了导航触发的 SPACE 和 3D TSE MRCP 检查,1.5T 场强,参数相同,除了回波间距。使用配对 t 检验对胰腺胆道树各段的信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)、相对对比度和轮廓锐利度指数进行定量分析。由 2 位独立放射科医生对 5 分制(1,优秀;5,差)的主观图像质量进行评分,采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行比较。
SPACE 序列的 SNR、CNR 和轮廓锐利度指数均显著优于 3D TSE(P < 0.05)。相对对比度和主观图像质量无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
我们证实了在缩短回波间距的情况下,SPACE MRCP 在 1.5T 场强下比常规 3D TSE MRCP 在定量方面具有优越性。