• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using indicators to determine the contribution of human rights to public health efforts.利用指标来确定人权对公共卫生工作的贡献。
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):714-9. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.058321.
2
Using concept mapping to develop a human rights based indicator framework to assess country efforts to strengthen rehabilitation provision and policy: the Rehabilitation System Diagnosis and Dialogue framework (RESYST).运用概念图制定一个基于人权的指标框架,以评估各国加强康复服务和政策的努力:康复系统诊断与对话框架(RESYST)。
Global Health. 2018 Oct 1;14(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0410-5.
3
A novel methodology for strengthening human rights based monitoring in public health: Family planning indicators as an illustrative example.一种强化公共卫生领域基于人权监测的新方法:以计划生育指标为例。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0186330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186330. eCollection 2017.
4
Assessing Nepal's health policies and programs from a human rights perspective.从人权角度评估尼泊尔的卫生政策和规划。
Indian J Public Health. 2018 Apr-Jun;62(2):123-127. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_308_16.
5
A comparative human rights analysis of laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya.乌干达和肯尼亚青少年避孕法律和政策的比较人权分析。
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 7;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01303-8.
6
Global Abortion Policies Database: a new approach to strengthening knowledge on laws, policies, and human rights standards.全球堕胎政策数据库:加强法律、政策和人权标准知识的新方法。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 Sep 12;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0174-2.
7
Key populations and human rights in the context of HIV services rendition in Ghana.加纳艾滋病服务提供背景下的重点人群与人权
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 Aug 2;17(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12914-017-0129-z.
8
History, principles, and practice of health and human rights.健康与人权的历史、原则及实践。
Lancet. 2007 Aug 4;370(9585):449-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61200-8.
9
Access to justice: evaluating law, health and human rights programmes in Kenya.司法救助:评估肯尼亚的法律、健康与人权项目
J Int AIDS Soc. 2013 Nov 13;16(3 Suppl 2):18726. doi: 10.7448/IAS.16.3.18726.
10
Policy reform to shift the health and human rights environment for vulnerable groups: the case of Kyrgyzstan's Instruction 417.政策改革以改善弱势群体的健康和人权环境:以吉尔吉斯斯坦第 417 号指令为例。
Health Hum Rights. 2012 Dec 15;14(2):34-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Practice of Developing Human Rights Indicators to Facilitate Accountability for the Human Right to Water and Sanitation.审视制定人权指标以促进对水和卫生设施权问责的实践。
J Hum Rights Pract. 2014 Mar;6(1):159-181. doi: 10.1093/jhuman/hut031.
2
How should implementation of the human right to health be assessed? A scoping review of the public health literature from 2000 to 2021.如何评估健康权的实施情况?对 2000 年至 2021 年公共卫生文献的范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 22;21(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01742-0.
3
Prioritising gender, equity, and human rights in a GRADE-based framework to inform future research on self care for sexual and reproductive health and rights.在基于 GRADE 的框架中优先考虑性别、公平和人权,以告知未来关于性健康和生殖健康自主权的研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Mar 30;5(3):e002128. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002128. eCollection 2020.
4
Developing emergency care systems: a human rights-based approach.制定紧急护理系统:基于人权的方法。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Sep 1;97(9):612-619. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.226605. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
5
Social Quality and Health: Examining Individual and Neighbourhood Contextual Effects Using a Multilevel Modelling Approach.社会质量与健康:使用多层次建模方法检验个体和邻里环境效应
Soc Indic Res. 2018;138(1):245-270. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1640-2. Epub 2017 May 12.
6
Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review.测量医疗环境中的社会排斥现象:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Feb 2;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0732-1.
7
A novel methodology for strengthening human rights based monitoring in public health: Family planning indicators as an illustrative example.一种强化公共卫生领域基于人权监测的新方法:以计划生育指标为例。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0186330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186330. eCollection 2017.
8
A review of measures of women's empowerment and related gender constructs in family planning and maternal health program evaluations in low- and middle-income countries.在中低收入国家的计划生育和孕产妇健康项目评估中,对妇女赋权和相关性别结构措施的综述。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Nov 8;17(Suppl 2):342. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1500-8.
9
Sexual and reproductive health and human rights of women living with HIV: a global community survey.感染艾滋病毒妇女的性与生殖健康及人权:一项全球社区调查
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Apr 1;94(4):243-9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.150912. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Epilepsy in India II: Impact, burden, and need for a multisectoral public health response.印度的癫痫症II:影响、负担以及多部门公共卫生应对的必要性。
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2015 Oct-Dec;18(4):369-81. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.165483.

本文引用的文献

1
Politics of monitoring and evaluation: Lessons from the AIDS epidemic.监测与评估的政治学:艾滋病流行的教训
New Dir Eval. 2004 Fall;2004(103):13-31. doi: 10.1002/ev.120. Epub 2004 Oct 21.
2
Universal Access to HIV prevention, treatment and care: assessing the inclusion of human rights in international and national strategic plans.普及艾滋病毒预防、治疗和护理:评估国际和国家战略计划中人权内容的纳入情况。
AIDS. 2008 Aug;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S123-32. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000327444.51408.21.
3
The human right to the highest attainable standard of health: new opportunities and challenges.享有能达到的最高健康标准的人权:新机遇与挑战
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006 Jul;100(7):603-7. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 May 2.
4
Researching public health: behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate.研究公共卫生:质性与量化方法之争背后
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Feb;40(4):459-68. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0103-y.
5
Evaluating the quality of medical care.评估医疗质量。
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:166-206.
6
Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.种族主义与研究:塔斯基吉梅毒研究案例
Hastings Cent Rep. 1978 Dec;8(6):21-9.

利用指标来确定人权对公共卫生工作的贡献。

Using indicators to determine the contribution of human rights to public health efforts.

作者信息

Gruskin Sofia, Ferguson Laura

机构信息

Program on International Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):714-9. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.058321.

DOI:10.2471/blt.08.058321
PMID:19784452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2739915/
Abstract

There is general agreement on the need to integrate human rights into health policies and programmes, although there is still reluctance to go beyond rhetorical acknowledgement of their assumed significance. To determine the actual value of human rights for the effectiveness of public health efforts requires clarity about what their incorporation looks like in practice and how to assess their contribution. Despite the pervasive use of indicators in the public health field, indicators that specifically capture human rights concerns are not well developed and those that exist are inconsistently used. Even though 'health and human rights indicators' are increasingly being constructed, it is often the case that health indicators are used to draw conclusions about some interaction between human rights and health; or that law and policy or other indicators, traditionally the domain of the human rights community, are used to make conclusions about health outcomes. To capture the added value that human rights bring to health, the differences in the contributions offered by these indicators need to be understood. To determine the value of different measures for advancing programme effectiveness, improving health outcomes and promoting human rights, requires questioning the intended purpose behind the construction of an indicator, who uses it, the kind of indicator it is, the extent to which it provides information about vulnerable populations, as well as how the data are collected and used.

摘要

尽管人们仍然不愿超越对人权假定重要性的口头上的承认,但对于将人权纳入卫生政策和计划的必要性已达成普遍共识。要确定人权对公共卫生努力成效的实际价值,需要明确其在实践中的纳入情况以及如何评估其贡献。尽管指标在公共卫生领域广泛使用,但专门体现人权关切的指标发展不完善,且现有指标使用不一致。尽管“健康与人权指标”越来越多地被构建,但情况往往是,健康指标被用于得出关于人权与健康之间某种相互作用的结论;或者传统上属于人权领域的法律和政策或其他指标被用于得出关于健康结果的结论。为了捕捉人权给健康带来的附加值,需要了解这些指标所提供贡献的差异。要确定不同措施对于提高项目成效、改善健康结果和促进人权的价值,需要质疑指标构建背后的预期目的、谁在使用它、它是什么类型的指标、它在多大程度上提供了关于弱势群体的信息,以及数据是如何收集和使用的。