Suppr超能文献

角膜散光对眼反应分析仪和 Goldmann 压平眼压计测量眼压的影响。

Effect of corneal astigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Kitasato School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 228-8555, Japan.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;248(2):257-62. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1202-7. Epub 2009 Sep 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of corneal astigmatism on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using an Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT).

METHODS

We prospectively examined 59 normal eyes of 59 healthy volunteers (18 men, 41 women; age, mean +/- standard deviation, 40.5 +/- 14.2 years; age range, 19-68 years). We quantitatively assessed the values of corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOP(G)) using an ORA (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments). We also measured the IOP using a GAT (GAT-IOP). The amount of corneal astigmatism was assessed with an autokeratometer. We carried out these measurements three times, and the mean value obtained was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean IOPcc, IOP(G), and GAT-IOP were 14.7 +/- 2.6, 14.0 +/- 2.8, and 14.2 +/- 1.7 mmHg respectively. The mean corneal astigmatism was 0.94 +/- 0.55 D. We found no significant correlation between IOPcc and corneal astigmatism (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = -0.04, p = 0.79), or between IOP(G) and corneal astigmatism (r = 0.09, p = 0.52). However, we found a weak, but significant, correlation between GAT-IOP and corneal astigmatism (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.34, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Both IOPcc and IOP(G) measured with ORA were less affected by the amount of corneal astigmatism, and the GAT-IOP readings were significantly higher in eyes with greater corneal astigmatism, suggesting that IOPcc as well as IOP(G) may be helpful for accurate IOP measurements in eyes with some corneal astigmatism.

摘要

目的

评估使用眼反应分析仪(ORA)和 Goldmann 压平眼压计(GAT)测量角膜散光对眼压(IOP)的影响。

方法

我们前瞻性地检查了 59 名健康志愿者(18 名男性,41 名女性;年龄,平均值±标准差,40.5±14.2 岁;年龄范围,19-68 岁)的 59 只正常眼。我们使用 Reichert 眼科仪器定量评估了角膜补偿眼压(IOPcc)和 Goldmann 相关眼压(IOP(G))的值。我们还用 GAT(GAT-IOP)测量了 IOP。用自动角膜曲率计评估角膜散光量。我们进行了三次测量,使用获得的平均值进行统计分析。

结果

平均 IOPcc、IOP(G)和 GAT-IOP 分别为 14.7±2.6mmHg、14.0±2.8mmHg 和 14.2±1.7mmHg。平均角膜散光为 0.94±0.55D。我们发现 IOPcc 与角膜散光之间无显著相关性(Pearson 相关系数 r=-0.04,p=0.79),也不存在 IOP(G)与角膜散光之间的相关性(r=0.09,p=0.52)。然而,我们发现 GAT-IOP 与角膜散光之间存在弱但有统计学意义的相关性(Pearson 相关系数 r=0.34,p=0.009)。

结论

ORA 测量的 IOPcc 和 IOP(G) 受角膜散光量的影响较小,角膜散光较大的眼 GAT-IOP 读数明显较高,提示在存在一定程度角膜散光的情况下,IOPcc 和 IOP(G) 可能有助于准确测量眼压。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验