• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.

作者信息

Kaufmann Claude, Bachmann Lucas M, Thiel Michael A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3118-21. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0018.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.04-0018
PMID:15326129
Abstract

PURPOSE

The dynamic contour tonometer (DCT; Pascal tonometer) is a novel tonometer designed to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) independent of corneal properties. The purpose of this study was a comparison of the DCT with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) with respect to mean of IOP readings, the influence of ocular structural factors on IOP readings, and both intra- and interobserver variability, in a large group of healthy subjects.

METHODS

In a prospective study of 228 eyes, IOP measurements by GAT and DCT were compared, and the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, axial length, and anterior chamber depth were analyzed. To evaluate intra- and interobserver variability, IOP was measured in eight eyes by four observers.

RESULTS

There was a high concordance between the IOP readings obtained by DCT and GAT. However, IOP readings were consistently higher with DCT than with GAT (median difference: +1.7 mm Hg, interquartile range [25th-75th percentile] = 0.8-2.7 mm Hg). In contrast to GAT, multivariable regression analysis showed no significant effect of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, astigmatism, anterior chamber depth, and axial length on DCT readings. For repeated measurements the intraobserver variability was 0.65 mm Hg for the DCT and 1.1 mm Hg for the GAT (P = 0.008). Interobserver variability was 0.44 mm Hg for the DCT and 1.28 mm Hg for the GAT (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

IOP measurements by DCT are highly concordant with IOP readings obtained from GAT but do not vary in CCT and have a lower intra- and interobserver variability. DCT seems to be an appropriate method of tonometry for routine clinical use.

摘要

目的

动态轮廓眼压计(DCT;帕斯卡眼压计)是一种新型眼压计,旨在独立于角膜特性测量眼压(IOP)。本研究的目的是在一大组健康受试者中,比较DCT与Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)在眼压读数平均值、眼部结构因素对眼压读数的影响以及观察者内和观察者间变异性方面的差异。

方法

在一项对228只眼睛的前瞻性研究中,比较了GAT和DCT测量的眼压,并分析了中央角膜厚度(CCT)、角膜曲率、眼轴长度和前房深度的影响。为了评估观察者内和观察者间的变异性,四名观察者对八只眼睛进行了眼压测量。

结果

DCT和GAT获得的眼压读数之间具有高度一致性。然而,DCT测得的眼压读数始终高于GAT(中位数差异:+1.7 mmHg,四分位间距[第25 - 75百分位数]=0.8 - 2.7 mmHg)。与GAT不同,多变量回归分析显示角膜厚度、角膜曲率、散光、前房深度和眼轴长度对DCT读数无显著影响。对于重复测量,DCT的观察者内变异性为0.65 mmHg,GAT为1.1 mmHg(P = 0.008)。DCT的观察者间变异性为0.44 mmHg,GAT为1.28 mmHg(P = 0.017)。

结论

DCT测量的眼压与GAT获得的眼压读数高度一致,但不受CCT影响,且观察者内和观察者间变异性较低。DCT似乎是一种适用于常规临床使用的眼压测量方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3118-21. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0018.
2
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.动态轮廓眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计在深板层角膜移植术和穿透性角膜移植术中的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;145(2):215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.003.
3
The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.角膜厚度和年龄对Goldmann压平眼压测量法和动态轮廓眼压测量法的相对影响。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;89(12):1572-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.075580.
4
Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.中央角膜厚度和角膜滞后对青光眼患者使用动态轮廓眼压计、眼反应分析仪和Goldmann眼压计测量眼压的影响。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Aug;17(5):361-5. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c3ad3.
5
Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.Goldmann 压平眼压测量法与动态轮廓眼压测量法在正常眼和青光眼眼中的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2009 Feb;23(2):262-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703102. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
6
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计在青光眼诊疗中的比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2009 May;87(3):323-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01239.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
7
Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements.动态轮廓眼压测量法与前房内眼压测量的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2472-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1366. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
8
Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计在不对称开角型青光眼中的临床比较
J Glaucoma. 2007 Dec;16(8):694-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180408dc6.
9
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).在Descemet膜剥除自动内皮角膜移植术(DSAEK)后,动态轮廓眼压测量法与Goldmann压平眼压测量法的比较。
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009 Apr;226(4):241-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109242. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
10
Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.眼压计测量 Goldmann 压平眼压、动态轮廓眼压和眼反应分析仪眼压的精度。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.020. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing glaucoma care with smart contact lenses: An overview of recent developments.利用智能隐形眼镜提升青光眼护理:近期进展概述
Biomed Microdevices. 2025 Apr 21;27(2):18. doi: 10.1007/s10544-025-00740-7.
2
Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry correcting equations.动态轮廓眼压计与 Goldmann 压平眼压计校正方程的比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 23;12(1):20190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24318-y.
3
High-frequency ultrasound detects biomechanical weakening in keratoconus with lower stiffness at higher grade.
高频超声检测到圆锥角膜的生物力学减弱,随着病变程度的增加硬度降低。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 20;17(7):e0271749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271749. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy.三种眼压计在近视准分子原位角膜磨镶术和准分子激光角膜切削术后眼内压测量中的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 May 27;16:1623-1637. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S362344. eCollection 2022.
5
The Effects of Trabeculectomy on Ocular Pulse Amplitude in Patients with Glaucoma.小梁切除术对青光眼患者眼动脉搏动幅度的影响。
Beyoglu Eye J. 2019 Dec 24;4(3):190-195. doi: 10.14744/bej.2019.61687. eCollection 2019.
6
Measurement of Intraocular Pressure with Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Air-Puff Tonometers: A Comparative Study in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Healthy Cases.使用压平眼压计、动态轮廓眼压计和气流眼压计测量眼压:原发性开角型青光眼与健康病例的比较研究
Beyoglu Eye J. 2020 Dec 28;5(3):178-187. doi: 10.14744/bej.2020.82713. eCollection 2020.
7
Agreement of rebound and applanation tonometry intraocular pressure measurements during atmospheric pressure change.眼压在大气压力变化期间的回弹式和压平式眼压测量的一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0259143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259143. eCollection 2021.
8
Challenges in the complex management of post-keratoplasty glaucoma.角膜移植术后青光眼复杂管理中的挑战
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 20;13:25158414211031397. doi: 10.1177/25158414211031397. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
9
[Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry].玻璃体切除术后眼压升高——Goldmann压平眼压计测量的眼压低于动态轮廓眼压计测量的眼压
Ophthalmologe. 2022 Jan;119(Suppl 1):71-76. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01443-z. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
10
Central Corneal Thickness Among Filipino Patients in an Ambulatory Eye Surgery Center Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.在一家门诊眼科手术中心,使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描技术对菲律宾患者的中央角膜厚度进行研究。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 23;15:2653-2664. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S320281. eCollection 2021.