Littman Robert J
Department of Languages and Literatures of Europe and the Americas, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Oct;76(5):456-67. doi: 10.1002/msj.20137.
In 430 BC, a plague struck the city of Athens, which was then under siege by Sparta during the Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC). In the next 3 years, most of the population was infected, and perhaps as many as 75,000 to 100,000 people, 25% of the city's population, died. The Athenian general and historian Thucydides left an eye-witness account of this plague and a detailed description to allow future generations to identify the disease should it break out again. Because of the importance of Thucydides and Athens in Western history and culture, the Plague of Athens has taken a prominent position in the history of the West for the past 2500 years. Despite Thucydides' careful description, in the past 100 years, scholars and physicians have disagreed about the identification of the disease. Based on clinical symptoms, 2 diagnoses have dominated the modern literature on the Athenian plague: smallpox and typhus. New methodologies, including forensic anthropology, demography, epidemiology, and paleopathogy, including DNA analysis, have shed new light on the problem. Mathematical modeling has allowed the examination of the infection and attack rates and the determination of how long it takes a disease to spread in a city and how long it remains endemic. The highly contagious epidemic exhibited a pustular rash, high fever, and diarrhea. Originating in Ethiopia, it spread throughout the Mediterranean. It spared no segment of the population, including the statesman Pericles. The epidemic broke in early May 430 BC, with another wave in the summer of 428 BC and in the winter of 427-426 BC, and lasted 4.5 to 5 years. Thucydides portrays a virgin soil epidemic with a high attack rate and an unvarying course in persons of different ages, sexes, and nationalities.The epidemiological analysis excludes common source diseases and most respiratory diseases. The plague can be limited to either a reservoir diseases (zoonotic or vector-borne) or one of the respiratory diseases associated with an unusual means of persistence, either environmental/fomite persistence or adaptation to indolent transmission among dispersed rural populations. The first category includes typhus, arboviral diseases, and plague, and the second category includes smallpox. Both measles and explosive streptococcal disease appear to be much less likely candidates.In 2001, a mass grave was discovered that belonged to the plague years. Ancient microbial typhoid (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi) DNA was extracted from 3 skeletons. Because typhoid was endemic in the Greek world, it is not the likely cause of this sudden epidemic. Mt Sinai J Med 76:456-467, 2009. (c) 2009 Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
公元前430年,一场瘟疫袭击了雅典城,当时雅典正处于伯罗奔尼撒战争(公元前431 - 404年)期间,被斯巴达围困。在接下来的3年里,大部分人口被感染,可能多达75000至100000人死亡,占该城人口的25%。雅典将军兼历史学家修昔底德留下了对这场瘟疫的目击记述和详细描述,以便后人在疾病再次爆发时能够识别它。由于修昔底德和雅典在西方历史文化中的重要性,雅典瘟疫在过去2500年的西方历史中占据了显著地位。尽管修昔底德描述得很仔细,但在过去100年里,学者和医生们对这种疾病的识别存在分歧。基于临床症状,现代关于雅典瘟疫的文献中占主导地位的两种诊断是天花和斑疹伤寒。新的方法,包括法医人类学、人口统计学、流行病学和古病理学,包括DNA分析,为这个问题带来了新的启示。数学建模使得人们能够研究感染率和发病率,并确定一种疾病在城市中传播需要多长时间以及它保持地方流行状态的时间。这种高度传染性的流行病表现为脓疱疹、高烧和腹泻。它起源于埃塞俄比亚,蔓延到了整个地中海地区。它不放过任何阶层的人群,包括政治家伯里克利。这场瘟疫于公元前430年5月初爆发,公元前428年夏天以及公元前427 - 426年冬天又出现了一波,持续了4.5到5年。修昔底德描绘了一场原发地流行病,发病率高,在不同年龄、性别和国籍的人群中病程一致。流行病学分析排除了共同源疾病和大多数呼吸道疾病。这种瘟疫可能局限于储存宿主疾病(人畜共患病或媒介传播疾病)或与一种不寻常的持续传播方式相关的呼吸道疾病之一,要么是环境/污染物持续传播,要么是适应在分散的农村人口中缓慢传播。第一类包括斑疹伤寒、虫媒病毒疾病和鼠疫,第二类包括天花。麻疹和爆发性链球菌疾病似乎都不太可能是候选病因。2001年,人们发现了一个属于瘟疫年代的乱葬岗。从3具骨骼中提取了古代微生物伤寒(伤寒杆菌血清型伤寒)的DNA。由于伤寒在希腊世界是地方病,所以它不太可能是这场突然爆发的流行病的病因。《西奈山医学杂志》76:456 - 467,2009年。(c)2009年西奈山医学院。