Queen's University, Community Health & Epidemiology, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Nov;53(11):949-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01216.x. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
The paradigm surrounding the delivery of care for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) is shifting from a deficit-based approach to a support-based approach. However, it is unclear whether measures of support act as a proxy for adaptive functioning.
A sample of 40 staff or family members of individuals with ID completed the Supports Intensity Scale and the Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised, Short Form. Correlations were used to examine the relationship between these scales.
The subscales of the Supports Intensity Scale as well as the overall support needs index were highly correlated with both the Broad Independence W score and the support score (which reflects both maladaptive and adaptive behaviours) of the Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised.
The strong correlations between these two scales confirm previous findings that current measures of support and measures of adaptive behaviour tap into the same underlying construct. These findings have implications for the development, use and interpretation of research and planning tools.
为智力障碍者(ID)提供护理的模式正在从基于缺陷的方法转变为基于支持的方法。然而,支持措施是否可以作为适应功能的替代指标尚不清楚。
一组 40 名 ID 个体的工作人员或家属完成了支持强度量表和独立行为量表修订版,简短形式。使用相关性来检验这些量表之间的关系。
支持强度量表的子量表以及整体支持需求指数与独立行为量表修订版的广泛独立性 W 得分和支持得分(反映适应不良和适应行为)高度相关。
这两个量表之间的强相关性证实了之前的发现,即当前的支持措施测量和适应行为测量都涉及到相同的潜在结构。这些发现对研究和规划工具的开发、使用和解释具有影响。