• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化卒中残疾结局的价值:世界卫生组织全球疾病负担项目对改良 Rankin 量表每个级别进行的残疾权重评估。

Quantifying the value of stroke disability outcomes: WHO global burden of disease project disability weights for each level of the modified Rankin Scale.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Clinical Research Center, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

Stroke. 2009 Dec;40(12):3828-33. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.561365. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.561365
PMID:19797698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2788070/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) categorizes poststroke disability among 7 broad, ordinal grades, but the interval distances between these levels are spaced along the disability spectrum have not been previously investigated.

METHODS

We used the person trade-off procedure developed by the World Health Organization Global Burden of Disease Project (WHO-GBDP) to generate disability weights (DWs) ranging from 0 (normal) to 1 (dead) for each of 7 mRS grades. The ratings of an international, 9-member panel of stroke experts were combined by a modified Delphi process.

RESULTS

DWs (95% CI) were 0 for mRS 0, 0.046 (0.004 to 0.088) for mRS 1, 0.212 (0.175 to 0.250) for mRS 2, 0.331 (0.292 to 0.371) for mRS 3, 0.652 (0.625 to 0.678) for mRS 4, 0.944 (0.873 to 1.015) for mRS 5, and 1.0 for mRS 6. DWs of adjacent mRS levels were significantly different (P<0.001 for all). Coefficients of variation showed a high degree of consensus for DWs among panel members. DWs placed each of the 5 intermediate mRS states in different disability class levels of the WHO-GBDP anchor conditions and identified natural clusters to use when reducing the mRS to fewer categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Formal DW assignment confirms that the mRS is an ordered but unequally spaced scale. The availability of DWs for each mRS level now permits direct comparison of each poststroke outcome state with the outcomes of hundreds of other diseases in the WHO-GBDP and the expression of stroke burden in different populations by using the uniform metric of disability-adjusted life-years lost.

摘要

背景与目的

改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)将脑卒中后残疾分为 7 个广泛的有序等级,但这些水平之间的间隔距离沿残疾谱分布尚未得到研究。

方法

我们使用世界卫生组织全球疾病负担项目(WHO-GBDP)开发的个人权衡程序,为 7 个 mRS 等级中的每个等级生成残疾权重(DW),范围从 0(正常)到 1(死亡)。国际 9 人卒中专家小组的评分通过改良 Delphi 程序进行组合。

结果

DW(95%CI)为 mRS 0 为 0,mRS 1 为 0.046(0.004 至 0.088),mRS 2 为 0.212(0.175 至 0.250),mRS 3 为 0.331(0.292 至 0.371),mRS 4 为 0.652(0.625 至 0.678),mRS 5 为 0.944(0.873 至 1.015),mRS 6 为 1.0。相邻 mRS 水平的 DW 显著不同(所有 P<0.001)。变异系数显示,小组成员对 DW 具有高度共识。DW 将 5 个中间 mRS 状态分别置于 WHO-GBDP 锚定条件的不同残疾等级中,并确定了在减少 mRS 类别时使用的自然聚类。

结论

正式的 DW 赋值证实 mRS 是一个有序但不等距的量表。现在,每个 mRS 水平的 DW 都可以直接比较每个脑卒中后结局状态与 WHO-GBDP 中数百种其他疾病的结局,并使用丧失的残疾调整生命年来表达不同人群的脑卒中负担。

相似文献

1
Quantifying the value of stroke disability outcomes: WHO global burden of disease project disability weights for each level of the modified Rankin Scale.量化卒中残疾结局的价值:世界卫生组织全球疾病负担项目对改良 Rankin 量表每个级别进行的残疾权重评估。
Stroke. 2009 Dec;40(12):3828-33. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.561365. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
2
Disability weight for each level of the Expanded Disability Status Scale in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中扩展残疾状态量表各等级的残疾权重。
Mult Scler. 2014 Aug;20(9):1217-23. doi: 10.1177/1352458513518259. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
3
Determining the cut-off score for the Modified Barthel Index and the Modified Rankin Scale for assessment of functional independence and residual disability after stroke.确定改良巴氏指数和改良 Rankin 量表的截断分数,以评估中风后患者的功能独立性和残留残疾。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0226324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226324. eCollection 2020.
4
The measurement of disability weights for 18 prevalent acute poisoning conditions.18种常见急性中毒情况的残疾权重测量。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2016 Oct;35(10):1033-40. doi: 10.1177/0960327115617229. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
5
What should be defined as good outcome in stroke trials; a modified Rankin score of 0-1 or 0-2?在中风试验中,什么应被定义为良好的结果;改良Rankin量表评分为0 - 1还是0 - 2?
J Neurol. 2008 Jun;255(6):867-74. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0796-8. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
6
Association between disability measures and healthcare costs after initial treatment for acute stroke.急性卒中初始治疗后残疾指标与医疗费用之间的关联。
Stroke. 2007 Jun;38(6):1893-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.472381. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
7
Newly estimated disability weights for 196 health states in Hubei Province, China.中国湖北省196种健康状态的最新残疾权重估计值。
Popul Health Metr. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12963-024-00359-5.
8
Ordinal vs dichotomous analyses of modified Rankin Scale, 5-year outcome, and cost of stroke.改良 Rankin 量表、5 年结局和卒中成本的有序和二分分析。
Neurology. 2018 Nov 20;91(21):e1951-e1960. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006554. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
9
Stroke recovery profile and the Modified Rankin assessment.中风恢复情况及改良Rankin评估
Neuroepidemiology. 2001 Feb;20(1):26-30. doi: 10.1159/000054754.
10
Analyzing the modified rankin scale using concepts of the international classification of functioning, disability and health.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类的概念分析改良 Rankin 量表。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;52(2):203-13. Epub 2015 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus on the definition, components, timeframe and grading of composite outcome of postoperative pulmonary complication-protocol for an international mixed-method consensus study (PrECiSIOn).术后肺部并发症综合结局的定义、组成部分、时间范围和分级的共识——一项国际混合方法共识研究(PrECiSIOn)的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):e103888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103888.
2
Cost-effectiveness of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful thrombectomy.成功血栓切除术后动脉内溶栓的成本效益
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2025 Aug 12;7(1):e000372. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000372. eCollection 2025.
3
Endovascular thrombectomy in acute stroke with a large ischemic core: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.急性卒中合并大面积缺血核心区的血管内血栓切除术:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS Med. 2025 Apr 17;22(4):e1004484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004484. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Novel Risk Score to Predict Poor Outcome After Endovascular Treatment in Anterior Circulation Occlusive Acute Ischemic Stroke.预测前循环闭塞性急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗后不良预后的新型风险评分
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):e036329. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036329. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
5
Thrombectomy for Stroke With Large Infarct on Noncontrast CT: The TESLA Randomized Clinical Trial.非增强CT显示大面积梗死的卒中患者的血栓切除术:TESLA随机临床试验
JAMA. 2024 Sep 23;332(16):1355-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.13933.
6
Adjunctive Intravenous Argatroban or Eptifibatide for Ischemic Stroke.辅助性静脉注射阿加曲班或依替巴肽治疗缺血性脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Sep 5;391(9):810-820. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2314779.
7
Treatment outcome of bridge mechanical thrombectomy with different IV-tPA dosages in the standard and extended time window in real-world practice.在现实临床实践中,不同剂量静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(IV-tPA)在标准和延长时间窗内进行桥接机械取栓的治疗效果。
Neuroradiol J. 2025 Feb;38(1):87-92. doi: 10.1177/19714009241269447. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
8
Using 30-day modified rankin scale score to predict 90-day score in patients with intracranial hemorrhage: Derivation and validation of prediction model.利用 30 天改良 Rankin 量表评分预测颅内出血患者 90 天评分:预测模型的建立和验证。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0303757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303757. eCollection 2024.
9
Software with artificial intelligence-derived algorithms for analysing CT brain scans in people with a suspected acute stroke: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.软件采用人工智能衍生算法分析疑似急性脑卒中患者的 CT 脑扫描:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Mar;28(11):1-204. doi: 10.3310/RDPA1487.
10
Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior versus Anterior Circulation Stroke: Clinical Outcome Differs Only in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion.后循环与前循环卒中的静脉溶栓治疗:临床结局仅在大血管闭塞患者中存在差异。
Biomedicines. 2024 Feb 9;12(2):404. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12020404.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome analysis in clinical trial design for acute stroke: physicians' attitudes and choices.急性中风临床试验设计中的结果分析:医生的态度与选择。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(2):156-62. doi: 10.1159/000139663. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
2
Functional outcome 3 months after stroke predicts long-term survival.中风后3个月的功能转归可预测长期生存率。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(5):423-9. doi: 10.1159/000121343. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
3
Association between disability measures and healthcare costs after initial treatment for acute stroke.急性卒中初始治疗后残疾指标与医疗费用之间的关联。
Stroke. 2007 Jun;38(6):1893-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.472381. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
4
The unchanging incidence and case-fatality of stroke in the 1990s: a population-based study.20世纪90年代中风的发病率和病死率保持不变:一项基于人群的研究。
Stroke. 2006 Oct;37(10):2473-8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000242766.65550.92. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
5
NXY-059 for acute ischemic stroke.NXY - 059用于急性缺血性卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 9;354(6):588-600. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052980.
6
Incidence and trends of stroke and its subtypes in China: results from three large cities.中国卒中及其亚型的发病率和趋势:来自三个大城市的结果
Stroke. 2006 Jan;37(1):63-8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000194955.34820.78. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
7
Ultrasound-enhanced systemic thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.超声增强全身溶栓治疗急性缺血性卒中
N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 18;351(21):2170-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041175.
8
The utility of health states after stroke: a systematic review of the literature.中风后健康状态的效用:文献系统综述
Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1425-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1425.
9
Quality of life after cerebrovascular stroke: a systematic study of patients' preferences for different functional outcomes.脑血管卒中后的生活质量:对患者对不同功能结局偏好的系统研究。
J Intern Med. 1999 Sep;246(3):309-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00531.x.
10
Performing cost-effectiveness analysis by integrating randomized trial data with a comprehensive decision model: application to treatment of acute ischemic stroke.通过将随机试验数据与综合决策模型相结合进行成本效益分析:在急性缺血性中风治疗中的应用
J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Mar;52(3):259-71. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00151-6.