Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA.
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Oct;23(5):705-16. doi: 10.1037/a0016474.
This study addressed whether and how men and women who are not physically aggressive, physically aggressive toward only their children or their partners, or aggressive toward both children and their partners differ in their risk profiles. Risk factors unrelated to the partner or parenting role (e.g., impulsivity) and specific to one of these roles (e.g., negative parenting attributions or negative partner attributions) were examined using profile analysis. Dually aggressive men and women had the highest overall risk across all types of risk factors; nonaggressive men and women had consistently low risk. Individuals who were aggressive toward only their partners or their children had distinct risk profiles, with highest levels of risk on the role-specific variable sets. With the exception of parent-aggressive-only men, singly aggressive individuals' risk levels were significantly lower on role-independent and unrelated role-specific risk factors than they were on role-related risk factors. These results suggest theories of partner and parent aggression might gain precision if co-occurrence status were specifically taken into account.
本研究旨在探讨不具有身体攻击性、仅对子女或伴侣具有身体攻击性或对子女和伴侣均具有攻击性的男性和女性在风险特征上是否存在差异，以及存在哪些差异。本研究使用特征分析的方法，考察了与伴侣或育儿角色无关（例如冲动）和特定于这些角色之一（例如负面育儿归因或负面伴侣归因）的风险因素。双重攻击性的男性和女性在所有类型的风险因素上的总体风险最高；非攻击性的男性和女性的风险始终较低。仅对伴侣或子女具有攻击性的个体具有不同的风险特征，在特定于角色的变量集中风险水平最高。除了仅对父母具有攻击性的男性外，单一攻击性个体在独立于角色和与角色无关的风险因素上的风险水平显著低于在与角色相关的风险因素上的风险水平。这些结果表明，如果特别考虑共存状态，伴侣和父母攻击的理论可能会更加精确。
