• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在队列研究和病例对照研究中估计直接效应。

Estimating direct effects in cohort and case-control studies.

机构信息

Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2009 Nov;20(6):851-60. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181b6f4c9.

DOI:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181b6f4c9
PMID:19806060
Abstract

Estimating the effect of an exposure on an outcome, other than through some given mediator, requires adjustment for all risk factors of the mediator that are also associated with the outcome. When these risk factors are themselves affected by the exposure, then standard regression methods do not apply. In this article, I review methods for accommodating this and discuss their limitations for estimating the controlled direct effect (ie, the exposure effect when controlling the mediator at a specified level uniformly in the population). In addition, I propose a powerful and easy-to-apply alternative that uses G-estimation in structural nested models to address these limitations both for cohort and case-control studies.

摘要

估计暴露对结果的影响,而不是通过某个给定的中介,需要调整与结果相关的所有中介的风险因素。当这些风险因素本身受到暴露的影响时,那么标准回归方法就不适用了。在本文中,我回顾了适应这种情况的方法,并讨论了它们在估计受控直接效应(即在人群中统一控制中介时的暴露效应)方面的局限性。此外,我还提出了一种强大且易于应用的替代方法,该方法使用结构嵌套模型中的 G 估计来解决队列研究和病例对照研究的这些局限性。

相似文献

1
Estimating direct effects in cohort and case-control studies.在队列研究和病例对照研究中估计直接效应。
Epidemiology. 2009 Nov;20(6):851-60. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181b6f4c9.
2
Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias.流行病学中的中介分析:方法、解释和偏倚。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;42(5):1511-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt127. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
3
Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.空气污染对健康影响的流行病学研究中的统计方法。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 1999 May(86):1-50; discussion 51-6.
4
G-computation demonstration in causal mediation analysis.因果中介分析中的G计算演示。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;30(10):1119-27. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0100-z. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
5
[Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality].[流行病学研究的解读。研究类型、偏倚因素、因果关系]
Rev Prat. 1999 Oct 15;49(16):1797-804.
6
Invited commentary: G-computation--lost in translation?特邀评论:G 计算——翻译中的迷失?
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 1;173(7):739-42. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq474. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
7
Fallibility in estimating direct effects.估计直接效应时的易误性。
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):163-5. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.163.
8
An introduction to g methods.G方法简介。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):756-762. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw323.
9
Misclassification of the mediator matters when estimating indirect effects.当估计间接效应时,调解者的错误分类很重要。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 May;67(5):458-66. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201813. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
10
Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder.存在暴露引起的中介结局混杂因素时的效应分解。
Epidemiology. 2014 Mar;25(2):300-6. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000034.

引用本文的文献

1
The gap-closing estimand: A causal approach to study interventions that close disparities across social categories.差距缩小估计量:一种研究消除社会类别间差距干预措施的因果方法。
Sociol Methods Res. 2024 May;53(2):507-570. doi: 10.1177/00491241211055769. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
No causal relationship between ankylosing spondylitis and Parkinson's disease: Insights from Mendelian randomization studies.强直性脊柱炎与帕金森病之间无因果关系:孟德尔随机化研究的见解
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 14;10(22):e40381. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40381. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
3
Integrating Multi-Omics with environmental data for precision health: A novel analytic framework and case study on prenatal mercury induced childhood fatty liver disease.
整合多组学与环境数据进行精准健康研究:基于产前汞诱导儿童脂肪肝疾病的新型分析框架及案例研究。
Environ Int. 2024 Aug;190:108930. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108930. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
4
Recent Developments in Causal Inference and Machine Learning.因果推断与机器学习的最新进展
Annu Rev Sociol. 2023 Jul;49:81-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-015345. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Metabolic Acidosis Is Associated With an Accelerated Decline of Allograft Function in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation.代谢性酸中毒与小儿肾移植中移植肾功能的加速下降有关。
Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Apr 8;9(6):1684-1693. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.04.007. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Reducing behavior problems in children born after an unintended pregnancy: the generation R study.减少意外怀孕后出生儿童的行为问题:R 世代研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Dec;59(12):2247-2258. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02693-3. Epub 2024 May 31.
7
Sjögren's syndrome and Parkinson's Disease: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.干燥综合征与帕金森病的双向两样本孟德尔随机化研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 3;19(4):e0298778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298778. eCollection 2024.
8
The association between the multiple birth and breast cancer incidence: an update of a systematic review and meta-analysis from 1983 to 2022.多胎生育与乳腺癌发病率之间的关联:1983年至2022年系统评价与荟萃分析的更新
Arch Public Health. 2023 Apr 28;81(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01089-0.
9
Does weight mediate the effect of smoking on coronary heart disease? Parametric mediational g-formula analysis.体重是否在吸烟对冠心病的影响中起中介作用?参数中介 g 公式分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0262403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262403. eCollection 2022.
10
Assessing Potential Outcomes Mediation in HIV Interventions.评估 HIV 干预措施中潜在结局的中介作用。
AIDS Behav. 2021 Aug;25(8):2441-2454. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03207-x. Epub 2021 Mar 19.