• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视力对目标辨别和射击表现的影响。

The effects of visual acuity on target discrimination and shooting performance.

作者信息

Hatch Brian C, Hilber David J, Elledge James B, Stout James W, Lee Robyn B

机构信息

Tri-Service Vision Conservation and Readiness Program, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground/EA, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Dec;86(12):E1359-67. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181be9740.

DOI:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181be9740
PMID:19806062
Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore the effects of visual acuity on target discrimination and marksmanship.

METHODS

A randomized, single-blind, repeated measures study was conducted to evaluate the effect of visual acuity on target discrimination and marksmanship. Subjects were examined for inclusion criteria and equivalent plus lens over-refractions necessary to obtain the five test visual acuity ranges. Qualified subjects fired at randomized target presentations from 50 to 300 m while wearing customized spectacles to yield the visual acuity levels being evaluated. Subjects then rotated foxholes for target discrimination sequences. Randomized targets marked as friend or enemy were presented in like manner for each of the five visual acuity levels.

RESULTS

Subjects at acuities better than 0.2 LogMAR were significantly more likely to hit the target than those with acuities equal to or worse than 0.7 LogMAR. Target discrimination results show subjects with acuities between -0.2 and 0.6 LogMAR were significantly more likely to correctly identify the target than those with acuities equal to or worse than 0.7 LogMAR. In addition, those at acuities of 0.0 LogMAR or better performed significantly better than those with acuities between 0.3 and 0.6 LogMAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual acuity significantly affects target discrimination and marksmanship performance. Results of this study closely mirror expected findings based on visual angles with acuities in the range 0.3 to 0.4 LogMAR (20/40-20/50) being the transition zone where performance begins to deteriorate. This performance-based evidence fully supports a vision classification system that mandates eyewear to maximize visual performance for deployable military members. Based on the results of this study, the current U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Marine Corps vision readiness standards of 20/40 or better uncorrected or corrected vision seems to be a valid choice because it is the transition point for performance in both target discrimination and marksmanship ability.

摘要

目的

探讨视力对目标识别和射击技能的影响。

方法

进行了一项随机、单盲、重复测量研究,以评估视力对目标识别和射击技能的影响。检查受试者的纳入标准以及获得五个测试视力范围所需的等效正透镜过矫。合格受试者在佩戴定制眼镜以产生所评估的视力水平的情况下,从50米至300米对随机呈现的目标进行射击。然后,受试者转动散兵坑进行目标识别序列测试。对于五个视力水平中的每一个,以类似方式呈现标记为友方或敌方的随机目标。

结果

视力优于0.2 LogMAR的受试者比视力等于或差于0.7 LogMAR的受试者更有可能击中目标。目标识别结果显示,视力在-0.2至0.6 LogMAR之间的受试者比视力等于或差于0.7 LogMAR的受试者更有可能正确识别目标。此外,视力为0.0 LogMAR或更好的受试者的表现明显优于视力在0.3至0.6 LogMAR之间的受试者。

结论

视力显著影响目标识别和射击技能表现。本研究结果与基于视角的预期结果密切相符,视力在0.3至0.4 LogMAR(20/40 - 20/50)范围内是性能开始下降的过渡区。这种基于性能的证据充分支持了一项视力分类系统,该系统要求佩戴眼镜以最大限度提高可部署军事人员的视觉性能。基于本研究结果,美国陆军、海军和海军陆战队目前的视力准备标准,即未矫正或矫正视力达到20/40或更好,似乎是一个有效的选择,因为它是目标识别和射击技能表现的过渡点。

相似文献

1
The effects of visual acuity on target discrimination and shooting performance.视力对目标辨别和射击表现的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Dec;86(12):E1359-67. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181be9740.
2
Is the Cardiff Acuity Test effective in detecting refractive errors in children?加的夫视力测试在检测儿童屈光不正方面有效吗?
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;83(8):577-81. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000230268.99107.15.
3
Visual performance with night vision goggles after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.近视患者接受准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后使用夜视镜的视觉表现。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Mar;110(3):525-30. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01763-3.
4
Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.佩戴老花隐形眼镜者的视觉表现。
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;83(8):611-5. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232185.00091.45.
5
Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts.视网膜色素变性患者的阅读能力:一项使用MNREAD视力表的研究。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Oct;45(10):3418-24. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0390.
6
Caffeine restores engagement speed but not shooting precision following 22 h of active wakefulness.在经历22小时清醒活动后,咖啡因可恢复反应速度,但无法恢复射击精度。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Sep;75(9):771-6.
7
Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.改进ETDRS视力:一种计算机阈值测定设备的设计与结果
Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):701-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700496.
8
Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.Crystalens AT-45可调节人工晶状体的临床评估:美国食品药品监督管理局临床试验结果
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 May;32(5):812-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.007.
9
Visual acuity and the causes of visual loss in a population-based sample of 6-year-old Australian children.澳大利亚6岁儿童群体样本中的视力及视力丧失原因
Ophthalmology. 2005 Jul;112(7):1275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.01.052.
10
Computer-based measurement of letter and word acuity.基于计算机的字母和单词视敏度测量。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Mar;26(2):156-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00345.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Preliminary evaluation of the VIsion PERformance (VIPER) simulator.初步评估 VIsion PERformance(VIPER)模拟器。
Mil Med Res. 2020 Jan 16;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-0231-8.
2
Rifle Shooting for Athletes With Vision Impairment: Does One Class Fit All?视力障碍运动员的步枪射击:一种分级适用于所有人吗?
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 31;10:1727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01727. eCollection 2019.
3
A systematic review of job-specific workers' health surveillance activities for fire-fighting, ambulance, police and military personnel.
firefighting, ambulance, police and military personnel 职业特定的消防员、救护人员、警察和军人的健康监测活动的系统评价。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Dec;84(8):839-57. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0614-y. Epub 2011 Feb 12.