Baun Anders, Hartmann Nanna B, Grieger Khara D, Hansen Steffen Foss
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 113, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
J Environ Monit. 2009 Oct;11(10):1774-81. doi: 10.1039/b909730a. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of surface waters. This review provides an insight to the likely scenarios if an engineered nanoparticle should be considered a "priority substance" in the WFD. Through a brief literature review of the aquatic toxicity of carbon- and metal-containing ENPs and in light of principles to establish environmental quality standards, we conclude that it is impossible to set limit values for ENPs in surface waters now and in the foreseeable future. This is due to the extensive lack of knowledge not only in relation to unknown toxic effects, degradability, and bioaccumulation of ENPs in the aquatic environment, but also due to the questionable validity of test systems and methods to establish environmental quality standards (EQS). From this, we also suggest some paths to follow to compensate for these knowledge gaps which include environmental monitoring and a closer look at the use of ENPs in consumer products.
目前工程纳米颗粒(ENPs)在消费品中的广泛多样应用,预计会导致其直接和间接排放到水生环境中。在欧洲,《水框架指令》(WFD)负责维持地表水良好的化学和生态状况。本综述深入探讨了若一种工程纳米颗粒在《水框架指令》中被视为“优先物质”可能出现的情况。通过对含碳和含金属ENPs水生毒性的简要文献综述,并依据制定环境质量标准的原则,我们得出结论,在当前及可预见的未来,不可能为地表水的ENPs设定限值。这是因为不仅在ENPs在水生环境中的未知毒性效应、降解性和生物累积方面存在广泛知识空白,还因为用于建立环境质量标准(EQS)的测试系统和方法的有效性存疑。据此,我们还提出了一些弥补这些知识差距的途径,包括环境监测以及更密切关注消费品中ENPs的使用情况。