Suppr超能文献

睡眠呼吸暂停患者使用热凝注塑型口腔矫治器治疗的副作用。

Side effects of boil and bite type oral appliance therapy in sleep apnea patients.

机构信息

Department of Oral Health Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2010 Sep;14(3):227-32. doi: 10.1007/s11325-009-0304-0. Epub 2009 Oct 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Based on a mail-out questionnaire, this study analyzed compliance and side effects of one commonly used (TheraSnore) boil and bite oral appliance (OA) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

The questionnaire was sent to 84 patients 6 months after the delivery of the OA.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight percent (n = 47) of the patients returned the questionnaire. There was no significant difference in baseline data [age, body mass index (BMI), apnea-hypopnea index or the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)] between the returned and nonreturned questionnaires. Of the responding patients, 74.5% (n = 35) continued to use the appliance. Nonusers had a higher BMI and higher baseline ESS when compared with users. The majority (74.3%) of the users and 50.0% of the nonusers previously used a nasal continuous positive airway pressure machine. Some 82.9% of the users wore their OA more than 3 days a week. Of the nonusers, 77.8% stopped using the OA in the first 3 months, and the most frequent reason given was "uncomfortable." Many users complained about a dry mouth and/or excessive salivation and nonusers significantly complained more about ill-fitting appliances. Over 80% of the users experienced improvement in their snoring, daytime sleepiness, and apnea. More than 60% of the users were satisfied with OA therapy.

CONCLUSION

While this study demonstrated similar self-reported compliance as previous reports, there were different side effects from those reported for custom-made appliances. Difficulty in optimal fit is considered to be the main cause of the subsequent stopping of the use of the boil and bite appliance.

摘要

简介

本研究通过邮寄问卷调查的方式,分析了一位阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者对一种常用(TheraSnore)热凝注塑式口腔矫治器(OA)的依从性和副作用。

方法

问卷在 OA 交付后 6 个月发送给 84 名患者。

结果

58%(n=47)的患者返回了问卷。返回问卷和未返回问卷的患者在基线数据(年龄、体重指数(BMI)、呼吸暂停低通气指数或 Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS))方面无显著差异。在回答问题的患者中,74.5%(n=35)继续使用矫治器。未使用者的 BMI 和基线 ESS 高于使用者。大多数(74.3%)使用者和 50.0%的未使用者之前使用过持续气道正压通气(CPAP)机。约 82.9%的使用者每周佩戴口腔矫治器超过 3 天。在未使用者中,77.8%的人在头 3 个月停止使用 OA,最常见的原因是“不舒服”。许多使用者抱怨口腔干燥和/或唾液过多,未使用者明显抱怨矫治器不合适。超过 80%的使用者的打鼾、白天嗜睡和呼吸暂停症状得到改善。超过 60%的使用者对 OA 治疗满意。

结论

虽然本研究报告的自我报告依从性与之前的报告相似,但副作用与定制矫治器报告的不同。难以达到最佳适配被认为是随后停止使用热凝注塑式口腔矫治器的主要原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验