Suppr超能文献

口服避孕药治疗原发性痛经。

Oral contraceptive pill for primary dysmenorrhoea.

作者信息

Wong Chooi L, Farquhar Cindy, Roberts Helen, Proctor Michelle

机构信息

O & G, FMHS, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD002120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002120.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dysmenorrhoea (painful menstrual cramps) is common. Combined OCPs are recommended in the management of primary dysmenorrhoea.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of combined oral contraceptive pills for the management of primary dysmenorrhoea.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We conducted electronic searches for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Register of controlled trials CENTRAL, CCTR, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (first conducted in 2001, updated on 5 November 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs comparing all combined OCPs with other combined OCPs, placebo, no management, or management with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) were considered.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty three studies were identified and ten were included. Six compared the combined OCP with placebo and four compared different dosages of combined OCP.

MAIN RESULTS

One study of low dose oestrogen and four studies of medium dose oestrogen combined OCPs compared with placebo, for a combined total of 497 women, reported pain improvement. For the outcome of pain relief across the different OCPs the pooled OR suggested benefit with OCPs compared to placebo (7 RCTs: Peto OR 2.01 [95% CI 1.32, 3.08]).The Chi-squared test for heterogeneity showed there is significant heterogeneity with an I(2) statistic of 64% and a significant chi-square test (14.06, df=5, p=0.02). A sensitivity analysis removing the studies with inadequate allocation concealment suggested significant benefit of treatment with the pooled OR of 2.99 (95% CI 1.76, 5.07) and heterogeneity no longer statistically significant and I(2) statistic of 0%.Three studies reported adverse effects (Davis 2005; Hendrix 2002; GPRG 1968) The adverse effects were nausea, headaches and weight gain. Two studies reported if women experienced any side effect and no evidence of an effect was found (3 RCTs: OR = 1.45 (95% 0.71, 2.94). There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity.There were no studies identified that compared combined OCP versus non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsThere was no evidence of a difference for the pooled studies for 3rd generation pro gestagens (OR = 1.11 (95% CI 0.79 - 1.57)). For the 2nd generation versus 3rd generation the OR was 0.44 (95% CI 0.23-0.84) suggesting benefit of the 3rd generation OCP but this was for a single study (Winkler 2003).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence for pain improvement with the use of the OCP (both low and medium dose oestrogen) in women with dysmenorrhoea. There is no evidence of a difference between different OCP preparations.

摘要

背景

痛经(经期疼痛性痉挛)很常见。复方口服避孕药(OCP)被推荐用于原发性痛经的治疗。

目的

确定复方口服避孕药治疗原发性痛经的有效性和安全性。

检索策略

我们在Cochrane月经紊乱与生育力低下研究组对照试验注册库CENTRAL、CCTR、MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL中进行了电子检索(首次检索于2001年,2008年11月5日更新)。

入选标准

纳入比较所有复方OCP与其他复方OCP、安慰剂、不治疗或使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。

数据收集与分析

共识别出23项研究,纳入了10项。6项研究比较了复方OCP与安慰剂,4项研究比较了不同剂量的复方OCP。

主要结果

一项低剂量雌激素和四项中剂量雌激素复方OCP与安慰剂比较的研究,共纳入497名女性,报告疼痛有改善。对于不同OCP的疼痛缓解结果,汇总的比值比表明与安慰剂相比OCP有益(7项RCT:Peto比值比2.01 [95%置信区间1.32, 3.08])。异质性卡方检验显示存在显著异质性,I²统计量为64%,卡方检验显著(14.06,自由度=5,p = 0.02)。一项敏感性分析排除了分配隐藏不充分的研究,结果显示治疗有显著益处,汇总比值比为2.99(95%置信区间1.76, 5.07),异质性不再具有统计学意义,I²统计量为0%。三项研究报告了不良反应(Davis 2005;Hendrix 2002;GPRG 1968)。不良反应为恶心、头痛和体重增加。两项研究报告了女性是否经历任何副作用,未发现有影响的证据(3项RCT:比值比 = 1.45 [95% 0.71, 2.94])。没有统计学异质性的证据。未发现比较复方OCP与非甾体抗炎药的研究。对于汇总研究,第三代孕激素没有差异的证据(比值比 = 1.11 [95%置信区间0.79 - 1.57])。第二代与第三代相比,比值比为0.44(95%置信区间0.23 - 0.84),表明第三代OCP有益,但这仅基于一项研究(Winkler 2003)。

作者结论

使用OCP(低剂量和中剂量雌激素)改善痛经女性疼痛的证据有限。不同OCP制剂之间没有差异的证据。

相似文献

1
Oral contraceptive pill for primary dysmenorrhoea.口服避孕药治疗原发性痛经。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD002120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002120.pub3.
2
Oral contraceptive pill as treatment for primary dysmenorrhoea.口服避孕药治疗原发性痛经。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD002120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002120.pub2.
5
Nifedipine for primary dysmenorrhoea.硝苯地平治疗原发性痛经。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 18;12(12):CD012912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012912.pub2.
6
Spinal manipulation for primary and secondary dysmenorrhoea.脊柱推拿治疗原发性和继发性痛经。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD002119. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002119.
7
Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis.用于治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的口服避孕药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 22;5(5):CD001019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001019.pub3.

引用本文的文献

10
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review.痛经的整骨手法治疗:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jan 23;16(1):e52794. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52794. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Oral contraceptives: side effects and depression in adolescent girls.口服避孕药:青春期女孩的副作用与抑郁
Contraception. 2007 Apr;75(4):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.09.008. Epub 2007 Feb 26.
2
Challenges of conducting a placebo-controlled trial for dysmenorrhea in adolescents.针对青少年痛经开展安慰剂对照试验的挑战。
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Oct;39(4):607-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.03.019. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
3
Primary dysmenorrhea: advances in pathogenesis and management.原发性痛经:发病机制与治疗进展
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):428-41. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000230214.26638.0c.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验