Suppr超能文献

旅行者预防疟疾的药物。

Drugs for preventing malaria in travellers.

作者信息

Jacquerioz Frederique A, Croft Ashley M

机构信息

Center for Evidence-Based Global Health, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, TDW, Ste 1820, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 70115.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD006491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006491.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malaria infects 10,000 to 30,000 international travellers each year. It can be prevented through anti-mosquito measures and drug prophylaxis. However, antimalaria drugs have adverse effects which are sometimes serious.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of currently used antimalaria drugs when given as prophylaxis to non-immune adult and child travellers who are travelling to regions with Plasmodium falciparum resistance to chloroquine. Specifically, to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of atovaquone-proguanil, doxycycline, and mefloquine compared to each other, and also when compared to chloroquine-proguanil and to primaquine.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In August 2009 we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, BIOSIS, mRCT, and reference lists. We handsearched conference proceedings and one specialist journal, and contacted researchers and drug companies. We searched PubMed for drug-related deaths.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of any antimalaria drug regimen currently used by non-immune international travellers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently extracted data and assessed eligibility and risk of bias using a standardized data collection form. We resolved any disagreement through discussion. We combined dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD), presenting both with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials (4240 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Evidence on comparative efficacy from head-to-head comparisons was limited. Atovaquone-proguanil compared to doxycycline had similar adverse events reported. Compared to mefloquine, atovaquone-proguanil users had fewer reports of any adverse effect (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.85), gastrointestinal adverse effects (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.7), neuropsychiatric adverse events (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99), and neuropsychiatric adverse effects (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.63), besides a better total mood disturbance score (MD -7.20, 95% CI -10.79 to -3.61). Similarly, doxycycline users had fewer reported neuropsychiatric events than mefloquine users (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.96). We also examined these three regimens against chloroquine-proguanil; this latter regimen had more reports of any adverse effect (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.96) and of gastrointestinal adverse effects (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.85).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Atovaquone-proguanil and doxycycline are the best tolerated regimens, and mefloquine is associated with adverse neuropsychiatric outcomes.

摘要

背景

疟疾每年感染10000至30000名国际旅行者。可通过防蚊措施和药物预防来预防。然而,抗疟药物有不良反应,有时还很严重。

目的

比较目前用于前往恶性疟原虫对氯喹耐药地区的非免疫成人和儿童旅行者预防用药时,现有抗疟药物的效果。具体而言,评估阿托伐醌-氯胍、强力霉素和甲氟喹相互之间以及与氯喹-氯胍和伯氨喹相比的疗效、安全性和耐受性。

检索策略

2009年8月,我们检索了Cochrane传染病组专业注册库、CENTRAL(Cochrane图书馆2008年第4期)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、LILACS、BIOSIS、mRCT及参考文献列表。我们手工检索了会议论文集和一本专业期刊,并联系了研究人员和制药公司。我们在PubMed上检索了与药物相关的死亡情况。

选择标准

非免疫国际旅行者目前使用的任何抗疟药物方案的随机和半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

我们使用标准化数据收集表独立提取数据,并评估入选资格和偏倚风险。我们通过讨论解决任何分歧。我们使用风险比(RR)合并二分法结果,使用平均差(MD)合并连续数据,并给出95%置信区间(CI)。

主要结果

八项试验(4240名参与者)符合纳入标准。直接比较的比较疗效证据有限。与强力霉素相比,阿托伐醌-氯胍报告的不良事件相似。与甲氟喹相比,阿托伐醌-氯胍使用者报告的任何不良反应(RR 0.72,95%CI 0.6至0.85)、胃肠道不良反应(RR 0.54,95%CI 0.42至0.7)、神经精神不良反应(RR 0.86,95%CI 0.75至0.99)和神经精神不良反应(RR 0.49,95%CI 0.38至0.63)较少,此外总体情绪障碍评分更好(MD -7.20,95%CI -10.79至-3.61)。同样,强力霉素使用者报告的神经精神事件比甲氟喹使用者少(RR 0.84,95%CI 0.73至0.96)。我们还比较了这三种方案与氯喹-氯胍;后一种方案报告的任何不良反应(RR 0.84,95%CI 0.73至0.96)和胃肠道不良反应(RR 0.71,95%CI 0.6至0.85)更多。

作者结论

阿托伐醌-氯胍和强力霉素是耐受性最好的方案,而甲氟喹与不良神经精神结局相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验