Suppr超能文献

在温尼科特与拉康之间的空间中思考。

Thinking in the space between Winnicott and Lacan.

作者信息

Luepnitz Deborah Anna

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Int J Psychoanal. 2009 Oct;90(5):957-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00156.x.

Abstract

The author, following André Green, maintains that the two most original psychoanalytic thinkers since Freud were Donald Winnicott and Jacques Lacan. Winnicott, it has been said, introduced the comic tradition into psychoanalysis, while Lacan sustained Freud's tragic/ironic vision. Years of mutual avoidance by their followers (especially of Lacan by Anglophone clinicians) has arguably diminished understanding of the full spectrum of psychoanalytic thought. The author outlines some basic constructs of Winnicott and of Lacan, including: their organizing tropes of selfhood versus subjectivity, their views of the "mirror stage", and their definitions of the aims of treatment. While the ideas of Winnicott and Lacan appear at some points complementary, the goal is not to integrate them into one master discourse, but rather to bring their radically different paradigms into provocative contact. A clinical vignette is offered to demonstrate concepts from Lacan and Winnicott, illustrating what it might mean to think and teach in the potential space between them.

摘要

作者追随安德烈·格林的观点,认为自弗洛伊德以来最具原创性的两位精神分析思想家是唐纳德·温尼科特和雅克·拉康。有人说,温尼科特将喜剧传统引入了精神分析,而拉康则秉持了弗洛伊德的悲剧/讽刺视角。他们的追随者多年来相互回避(尤其是英语国家的临床医生对拉康思想的回避),这无疑削弱了人们对精神分析思想全貌的理解。作者概述了温尼科特和拉康的一些基本概念,包括:他们关于自我与主体性的组织性比喻、他们对“镜像阶段”的看法以及他们对治疗目标的定义。虽然温尼科特和拉康的思想在某些方面看似互补,但目标并非将它们整合为一种主导性话语,而是要让它们截然不同的范式产生富有启发性的碰撞。文中提供了一个临床案例来阐释拉康和温尼科特的概念,说明在他们之间的潜在空间中进行思考和教学可能意味着什么。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验