• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种控制牙刷细菌污染的新方法:洗必泰涂层。

A novel approach to controlling bacterial contamination on toothbrushes: chlorhexidine coating.

机构信息

School of Dental Hygiene, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Dent Hyg. 2009 Nov;7(4):241-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00352.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00352.x
PMID:19832909
Abstract

PURPOSE

This project was conducted to determine the effectiveness of chlorhexidine-coated toothbrush filaments in reducing quantities of bacteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, two-group, double-blind, randomized, post-test only study was conducted. Sixty-four individuals utilized control and experimental toothbrushes, for 30 days. At the end of the study toothbrushes were returned and transported to the laboratory for analysis. Microorganisms were detached from the filaments by sonification and vortexing then plated on Mitis Salivarius (MS) (selective) and trypticase soy agar (TSA) 5% Sheep Blood (non-selective) media. Inoculated plates were incubated aerobically for 24 h at 37 degrees C. After incubation, bacterial colony-forming units (CFU) were determined. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine toothbrushes were returned for analysis; experimental (n = 31) and control (n = 28). Data from TSA media revealed a mean CFU for the control group of 5.41 x 10(5) compared with 6.28 x 10(5) for the experimental group. Data from MS agar resulted in a mean CFU for the control group of 4.32 x 10(5) compared with 4.20 x 10(5) for the experimental group.

CONCLUSION

Results revealed no statistically significant difference in the quantity of bacteria surviving on toothbrush filaments between control and experimental groups, on both selective and non-selective media, after 30 days.

摘要

目的

本项目旨在确定氯己定涂层牙刷丝在减少细菌数量方面的有效性。

材料和方法

进行了一项机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的、两组、双盲、随机、仅后测试研究。64 名个体使用对照和实验组牙刷,为期 30 天。研究结束时,牙刷被退回并运送到实验室进行分析。通过超声处理和涡旋将微生物从丝上分离出来,然后接种到米氏链球菌(MS)(选择性)和胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂(TSA)5%绵羊血(非选择性)培养基上。接种的平板在 37°C 下需有氧孵育 24 小时。孵育后,确定细菌菌落形成单位(CFU)。使用 Wilcoxon 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验分析数据。

结果

有 59 支牙刷被送回进行分析;实验组(n=31)和对照组(n=28)。来自 TSA 培养基的数据显示,对照组的平均 CFU 为 5.41 x 10(5),而实验组的平均 CFU 为 6.28 x 10(5)。来自 MS 琼脂的数据得出对照组的平均 CFU 为 4.32 x 10(5),而实验组的平均 CFU 为 4.20 x 10(5)。

结论

结果显示,在 30 天后,两种选择性和非选择性培养基上,对照组和实验组牙刷丝上存活的细菌数量没有统计学上的显著差异。

相似文献

1
A novel approach to controlling bacterial contamination on toothbrushes: chlorhexidine coating.一种控制牙刷细菌污染的新方法:洗必泰涂层。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2009 Nov;7(4):241-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00352.x.
2
The efficacy of chlorhexidine spray vs mouthwash in the microbial contamination of child toothbrushes.洗必泰喷雾与漱口水对儿童牙刷微生物污染的功效比较
J Dent Child (Chic). 2007 Sep-Dec;74(3):177-81.
3
Antimicrobial spray for toothbrush disinfection: an in vivo evaluation.用于牙刷消毒的抗菌喷雾:一项体内评估。
Quintessence Int. 2005 Nov-Dec;36(10):812-6.
4
Microbial contamination of toothbrushes and their decontamination.牙刷的微生物污染及其去污处理
Pediatr Dent. 2000 Sep-Oct;22(5):381-4.
5
[Microbiological study of the efficiency of various hygienic products for toothbrushes].[各类牙刷卫生用品功效的微生物学研究]
Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2012;91(1):31-4.
6
Bacterial contamination and decontamination of toothbrushes after use.牙刷使用后的细菌污染与消毒
N Y State Dent J. 2007 Apr;73(3):20-2.
7
Evaluation of two alternative methods for disinfection of toothbrushes and tongue scrapers.评价两种替代牙刷和舌刮器消毒方法。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2011 Nov;9(4):279-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2011.00503.x. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
8
Reduction in bacterial contamination of toothbrushes using the Violight ultraviolet light activated toothbrush sanitizer.使用Violight紫外线激活牙刷消毒器减少牙刷的细菌污染
Am J Dent. 2008 Oct;21(5):313-7.
9
The efficacy of two UV toothbrush sanitization devices. A pilot study.两种紫外线牙刷消毒装置的功效:一项初步研究。
N Y State Dent J. 2008 Jan;74(1):50-2.
10
Contamination of toothbrush at different time intervals and effectiveness of various disinfecting solutions in reducing the contamination of toothbrush.不同时间间隔牙刷的污染情况以及各种消毒溶液在减少牙刷污染方面的有效性。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2002 Sep;20(3):81-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Don't Rush with Your Brush: An Study on Toothbrush Hygiene.别急着用牙刷:一项关于牙刷卫生的研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;17(2):162-167. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2776.
2
Dental Plaque Removal with Two Special Needs Toothbrushes in Patients with Down Syndrome: A Parallel-Group Randomised Clinical Trial of Efficacy.两种特殊需求牙刷去除唐氏综合征患者牙菌斑的效果:一项平行组随机临床试验。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2022 Nov 30;20:501-508. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b3630331.
3
Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study.
不同消毒技术对牙刷去污效果的体外研究
Cureus. 2022 Jan 11;14(1):e21117. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21117. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Efficacy of two mouth rinse sprays in inhibiting growth on toothbrush bristles.两种漱口水喷雾剂抑制牙刷刷毛上细菌生长的效果。
Saudi Dent J. 2018 Oct;30(4):365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
5
Comparison of Bacterial Contamination and Antibacterial Efficacy in Bristles of Charcoal Toothbrushes versus Noncharcoal Toothbrushes: A Microbiological Study.炭质牙刷与非炭质牙刷刷毛的细菌污染及抗菌效果比较:一项微生物学研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):463-467. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_309_18.
6
Evaluating sanitization of toothbrushes using ultra violet rays and 0.2% chlorhexidine solution: A comparative clinical study.使用紫外线和0.2%氯己定溶液评估牙刷消毒效果:一项对比临床研究。
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014 Dec;6(1):12-8. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.145769.
7
A microbiological assessment of the oral hygiene of 24-72-month-old kindergarten children and disinfection of their toothbrushes.对 24-72 个月大的幼儿园儿童口腔卫生状况的微生物学评估及牙刷消毒。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Aug 2;14:94. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-94.
8
Oral health: charcoal brushes.口腔健康:炭刷。
Br Dent J. 2014 Jul 11;217(1):3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.557.
9
Children's toothbrush contamination in day-care centers: how to solve this problem?日托中心儿童牙刷的污染问题:如何解决这个问题?
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Nov;18(8):1969-74. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1169-y. Epub 2013 Dec 24.