• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同消毒技术对牙刷去污效果的体外研究

Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study.

作者信息

Assari Ahmad S, Mohammed Mahrous Mohammed, Ahmad Yahia A, Alotaibi Faisal, Alshammari Muath, AlTurki Firas, AlShammari Thwaini

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, SAU.

Restorative Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jan 11;14(1):e21117. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21117. eCollection 2022 Jan.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.21117
PMID:35165574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8830509/
Abstract

Background Contaminated toothbrushes can cause several oral and systemic illnesses. This study aimed to identify the most rapid, effective, and affordable method for toothbrush decontamination. In addition, the most prevalent bacterial species colonizing toothbrushes were determined. Methodology Toothbrushes were collected after two weeks of use by 55 volunteers. The bacterial count was measured before and after sterilization using 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 0.1% Listerine, 70% white alcohol, 10% povidone-iodine, 1% sodium hypochlorite, 2% glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet radiation, microwave irradiation, 3% hydrogen peroxide, and 100% white vinegar, with tap water rinse as the control. Results A marked reduction in the bacterial count was observed pre- and post-sterilization. All sterilization methods were effective for toothbrush disinfection. Sterilization using 2% glutaraldehyde and 3% hydrogen peroxide solutions resulted in the most significant reduction in the mean bacterial count and percentage reduction in the total bacterial count, respectively. The toothbrush samples were also colonized by several different types of bacteria. The most common colonizing bacterial species included (28% prevalence), (26% prevalence),and (24% prevalence). Conclusions Because bacterial contamination cannot be eliminated and different species colonize toothbrush surfaces, cleaning and disinfection are essential to prevent disease transmission.

摘要

背景 受污染的牙刷可导致多种口腔和全身疾病。本研究旨在确定最快速、有效且经济实惠的牙刷消毒方法。此外,还确定了在牙刷上定殖的最常见细菌种类。方法 55名志愿者使用两周后的牙刷被收集起来。使用0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定、0.1%李施德林漱口水、70%白酒、10%聚维酮碘、1%次氯酸钠、2%戊二醛、紫外线辐射、微波辐射、3%过氧化氢和100%白醋进行消毒,以自来水冲洗作为对照,测量消毒前后的细菌数量。结果 消毒前后观察到细菌数量显著减少。所有消毒方法对牙刷消毒均有效。使用2%戊二醛溶液和3%过氧化氢溶液消毒分别导致平均细菌数量减少最多和总细菌数量减少百分比最高。牙刷样本还被几种不同类型的细菌定殖。最常见的定殖细菌种类包括(患病率28%)、(患病率26%)和(患病率24%)。结论 由于无法消除细菌污染且不同种类细菌定殖于牙刷表面,清洁和消毒对于预防疾病传播至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/2a387b975f45/cureus-0014-00000021117-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/165e3cca1a85/cureus-0014-00000021117-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/7113a21cc0c9/cureus-0014-00000021117-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/d6873f758720/cureus-0014-00000021117-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/93c59c925492/cureus-0014-00000021117-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/13a231903875/cureus-0014-00000021117-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/a34c4cc0b504/cureus-0014-00000021117-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/2a387b975f45/cureus-0014-00000021117-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/165e3cca1a85/cureus-0014-00000021117-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/7113a21cc0c9/cureus-0014-00000021117-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/d6873f758720/cureus-0014-00000021117-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/93c59c925492/cureus-0014-00000021117-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/13a231903875/cureus-0014-00000021117-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/a34c4cc0b504/cureus-0014-00000021117-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfb0/8830509/2a387b975f45/cureus-0014-00000021117-i07.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study.不同消毒技术对牙刷去污效果的体外研究
Cureus. 2022 Jan 11;14(1):e21117. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21117. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
A Prospective Study on Assessment of Microbial Contamination of Toothbrushes and Methods of Their Decontamination.牙刷微生物污染评估及其去污方法的前瞻性研究
Cureus. 2022 Oct 10;14(10):e30155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30155. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Evaluation of toothbrush disinfection via different methods.通过不同方法对牙刷消毒的评估。
Braz Oral Res. 2016;30. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0006. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
4
Microbial contamination of toothbrushes and their decontamination.牙刷的微生物污染及其去污处理
Pediatr Dent. 2000 Sep-Oct;22(5):381-4.
5
Evaluating sanitization of toothbrushes using ultra violet rays and 0.2% chlorhexidine solution: A comparative clinical study.使用紫外线和0.2%氯己定溶液评估牙刷消毒效果:一项对比临床研究。
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014 Dec;6(1):12-8. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.145769.
6
Bacterial contamination and decontamination of toothbrushes after use.牙刷使用后的细菌污染与消毒
N Y State Dent J. 2007 Apr;73(3):20-2.
7
Comparative evaluation of ultraviolet and microwave sanitization techniques for toothbrush decontamination.紫外线和微波消毒技术用于牙刷去污的比较评估
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2011 Jan;1(1):20-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.86383.
8
Don't Rush with Your Brush: An Study on Toothbrush Hygiene.别急着用牙刷:一项关于牙刷卫生的研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;17(2):162-167. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2776.
9
Antimicrobial efficacy of various disinfecting solutions in reducing the contamination of the toothbrush -- a comparative study.各种消毒溶液在减少牙刷污染方面的抗菌效果——一项对比研究。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2009;7(2):137-45.
10
Reduction in bacterial contamination of toothbrushes using the Violight ultraviolet light activated toothbrush sanitizer.使用Violight紫外线激活牙刷消毒器减少牙刷的细菌污染
Am J Dent. 2008 Oct;21(5):313-7.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro Efficacy of Domestic Techniques for Disinfection of Toothbrushes Contaminated With .国产技术对被……污染的牙刷进行消毒的体外效果
Int J Dent. 2024 Oct 18;2024:3509832. doi: 10.1155/2024/3509832. eCollection 2024.
2
Don't Rush with Your Brush: An Study on Toothbrush Hygiene.别急着用牙刷:一项关于牙刷卫生的研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;17(2):162-167. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2776.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Sanitization of Toothbrushes Using Various Decontamination Methods: A Meta-Analysis.使用各种去污方法评估牙刷的消毒:一项荟萃分析。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2019 Jan 27;16(41):364-371.
2
Evaluating sanitization of toothbrushes using ultra violet rays and 0.2% chlorhexidine solution: A comparative clinical study.使用紫外线和0.2%氯己定溶液评估牙刷消毒效果:一项对比临床研究。
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014 Dec;6(1):12-8. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.145769.
3
Effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection: an in vitro study.
牙刷消毒替代方法的有效性:一项体外研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:726190. doi: 10.1155/2014/726190. Epub 2014 May 25.
4
Disinfection protocols to prevent cross-contamination between dental offices and prosthetic laboratories.预防牙科诊室和义齿加工室之间交叉污染的消毒方案。
J Infect Public Health. 2013 Oct;6(5):377-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
5
Disinfection of toothbrushes contaminated with Streptococcus mutans.变形链球菌污染牙刷的消毒
Am J Dent. 2011 Jun;24(3):155-8.
6
Evaluation of alternative methods for the disinfection of toothbrushes.牙刷消毒替代方法的评价。
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Jan-Mar;24(1):28-33. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000100005.
7
A novel approach to controlling bacterial contamination on toothbrushes: chlorhexidine coating.一种控制牙刷细菌污染的新方法:洗必泰涂层。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2009 Nov;7(4):241-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00352.x.
8
Toothbrush contamination by Candida spp. and efficacy of mouthrinse spray for their disinfection.牙刷受念珠菌属污染及漱口水喷雾对其消毒的效果。
Mycopathologia. 2010 Feb;169(2):133-8. doi: 10.1007/s11046-009-9239-z. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
9
Antimicrobial efficacy of various disinfecting solutions in reducing the contamination of the toothbrush -- a comparative study.各种消毒溶液在减少牙刷污染方面的抗菌效果——一项对比研究。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2009;7(2):137-45.
10
Effectiveness of six different disinfectants on removing five microbial species and effects on the topographic characteristics of acrylic resin.六种不同消毒剂对去除五种微生物的效果及对丙烯酸树脂表面形貌特征的影响
J Prosthodont. 2008 Dec;17(8):627-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00358.x. Epub 2008 Aug 26.