Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
CREST, Centro per lo studio e la terapia dei disturbi di personalità, 20145, Milan, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 27;17(5):1521. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051521.
The study aims to explore the personality patterns of a group of transgender individuals who accessed an Italian gender clinic to undergo gender affirming treatments, by evaluating both dimensional personality domains proposed by the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders and categorical DSM-IV personality disorder (PD) diagnoses. Eighty-seven participants (40 transgender women and 47 transgender men) completed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders. Scores obtained were compared to those of the normative samples of cisgender women and men. Results indicated that transgender women scored lower than cisgender women on two main domains (Negative Affectivity and Psychoticism) and on seven facets. As for transgender men, lower scores than cisgender men were found on Antagonism and on five facets. Transgender men scored higher than cisgender men on Depressivity. Nearly 50% of participants showed at least one PD diagnosis, with no gender differences in prevalence. Borderline PD was the most frequent diagnosis in the overall sample. Self-report measures provide a less maladaptive profile of personality functioning than the clinician-based categorical assessment. Results are interpreted in the light of the Minority Stress Model and support the need for a multi-method assessment of personality in medicalized transgender people.
本研究旨在通过评估人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)提出的人格维度和 DSM-IV 人格障碍(PD)分类诊断,探索一组在意大利性别诊所接受性别肯定治疗的跨性别个体的人格模式。87 名参与者(40 名跨性别女性和 47 名跨性别男性)完成了 DSM-5 人格问卷和 DSM-IV 轴 II 人格障碍的结构化临床访谈。所得分数与顺性别女性和男性的常模样本进行了比较。结果表明,跨性别女性在两个主要领域(负性情感和精神病态)和七个方面的得分低于顺性别女性。对于跨性别男性,在对抗和五个方面的得分低于顺性别男性。跨性别男性在抑郁方面的得分高于顺性别男性。近 50%的参与者至少有一种 PD 诊断,且在患病率方面没有性别差异。边缘型 PD 是整个样本中最常见的诊断。自我报告量表提供的人格功能适应不良程度低于基于临床医生的分类评估。结果从少数群体应激模型的角度进行解释,并支持在接受医学治疗的跨性别者中进行人格多方法评估的必要性。