• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

源于人类感官的隐喻表达:德国内部状态术语隐喻的心理语言学和情感规范(MIST 数据库)。

Metaphorical expressions originating from human senses: Psycholinguistic and affective norms for German metaphors for internal state terms (MIST database).

机构信息

Department of German Linguistics, University of Marburg, Pilgrimstein 16, 35032, Marburg, Germany.

Department of English and Linguistics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):365-377. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01639-w. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-021-01639-w
PMID:34240337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8863705/
Abstract

Internal states, e.g., emotions, cognitive states, or desires, are often verbalized by figurative means, in particular by embodied metaphors involving human senses, such as touch, taste, and smell. The present paper presents a database for German metaphorical expressions conveying internal states with human senses as their source domains. 168 metaphorical expressions from the source domains of vision, hearing, smell, taste, touch, and temperature combined with literal equivalents were collected and rated by 643 adults. The agreement between the metaphor and an equivalent literal expression, as well as emotional valence, arousal, and familiarity values were assessed using a 7-point Likert scale. Between the metaphorical expressions and their equivalents, familiarity, but not valence or arousal differed significantly while agreement ratings indicated high similarity in meaning. The novel database offers carefully controlled stimuli that can be used in both empirical metaphor research and research on internal state language. Using part of the stimuli in a sentence completion experiment revealed a significant preference for literal over metaphorical expressions that cannot be attributed to higher familiarity levels.

摘要

内部状态,例如情绪、认知状态或欲望,通常通过比喻的方式来表达,特别是通过涉及人类感官的具体隐喻,如触觉、味觉和嗅觉。本文介绍了一个德语隐喻表达数据库,这些隐喻表达将人类感官作为源域来传达内部状态。从视觉、听觉、嗅觉、味觉、触觉和温度这 6 个源域中收集了 168 个隐喻表达,并由 643 名成年人对其进行了评分。使用 7 点李克特量表评估隐喻和相应的字面表达之间的一致性,以及情绪效价、唤醒度和熟悉度值。隐喻表达与其对应物之间的熟悉度存在显著差异,但效价或唤醒度没有显著差异,而一致性评分则表明它们在含义上具有高度的相似性。该新数据库提供了经过精心控制的刺激,可以用于实证隐喻研究和内部状态语言研究。在句子完成实验中使用部分刺激发现,对字面表达的偏好明显高于隐喻表达,而这种偏好不能归因于更高的熟悉度水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/1853a4dd1b3c/13428_2021_1639_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/b302822c7fcc/13428_2021_1639_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/6440ca7a52d8/13428_2021_1639_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/f301244fbd38/13428_2021_1639_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/20cf80e97ee6/13428_2021_1639_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/1853a4dd1b3c/13428_2021_1639_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/b302822c7fcc/13428_2021_1639_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/6440ca7a52d8/13428_2021_1639_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/f301244fbd38/13428_2021_1639_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/20cf80e97ee6/13428_2021_1639_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d6/8863705/1853a4dd1b3c/13428_2021_1639_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Metaphorical expressions originating from human senses: Psycholinguistic and affective norms for German metaphors for internal state terms (MIST database).源于人类感官的隐喻表达:德国内部状态术语隐喻的心理语言学和情感规范(MIST 数据库)。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):365-377. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01639-w. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
2
Affective and psycholinguistic norms for German conceptual metaphors (COMETA).德语概念隐喻(COMETA)的情感和心理语言学规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1056-1072. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01300-7.
3
When emotions are expressed figuratively: Psycholinguistic and Affective Norms of 619 Idioms for German (PANIG).当情感以比喻方式表达时:619个德语习语的心理语言学和情感规范(PANIG)
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):91-111. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0581-4.
4
Do Patients With Depression Prefer Literal or Metaphorical Expressions for Internal States? Evidence From Sentence Completion and Elicited Production.抑郁症患者对内心情态更倾向于直白表达还是隐喻表达?来自句子完成任务和引发式产出的证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 15;9:1326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01326. eCollection 2018.
5
Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts.隐喻性句子比直白的句子更能引起情感共鸣。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;26(11):2585-95. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00654. Epub 2014 May 6.
6
Role of implicit learning abilities in metaphor understanding.内隐学习能力在隐喻理解中的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 May;61:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
7
A dataset of metaphors from the italian literature: exploring psycholinguistic variables and the role of context.一个来自意大利文学的隐喻数据集:探索心理语言学变量及语境的作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 22;9(9):e105634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105634. eCollection 2014.
8
An Electrophysiological Abstractness Effect for Metaphorical Meaning Making.隐喻意义构建的电生理学抽象效应
eNeuro. 2020 Sep 10;7(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0052-20.2020. Print 2020 Sep/Oct.
9
Neural correlates of metaphor processing: the roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty.隐喻加工的神经关联:形象性、熟悉度和难度的作用。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):375-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
10
Stimulus needs are a moving target: 240 additional matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor.刺激需求是一个不断变化的目标:需要额外240个匹配的字面和隐喻句子来测试关于隐喻的神经假说。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):471-483. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0717-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvement of metaphor understanding via a cognitive linguistic model based on hierarchical classification and artificial intelligence SVM.通过基于层次分类和人工智能支持向量机的认知语言模型提高隐喻理解能力。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 29;15(1):18947. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04171-5.
2
Affective, semantic, frequency, and descriptive norms for 107 face emojis.107 个面部表情 emoji 的情感、语义、频率和描述性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8159-8180. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02444-x. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
Sensory translation between audition and vision.

本文引用的文献

1
Affective and psycholinguistic norms for German conceptual metaphors (COMETA).德语概念隐喻(COMETA)的情感和心理语言学规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1056-1072. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01300-7.
2
The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.兰开斯特感觉运动规范:40000 个英语单词的感知和动作强度的多维测量
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1271-1291. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z.
3
Differential Impact of Emotion on Semantic Processing of Abstract and Concrete Words: ERP and fMRI Evidence.
听觉与视觉之间的感觉翻译。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):599-626. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02343-w. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
4
The Elephant in the Room: A Systematic Review of Stimulus Control in Neuro-Measurement Studies on Figurative Language Processing.房间里的大象:关于比喻语言处理的神经测量研究中刺激控制的系统综述。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jan 21;15:791374. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.791374. eCollection 2021.
情绪对抽象词和具体词语义加工的差异影响:ERP 和 fMRI 证据。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 8;9(1):14439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50755-3.
4
How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables.在具备足够检验效能的实验中我们需要纳入多少参与者?一份带有参考表的检验效能分析教程。
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):16. doi: 10.5334/joc.72.
5
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.评估 2010 年至 2015 年期间《自然》和《科学》杂志上社会科学实验的可重复性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Sep;2(9):637-644. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
6
Time-Course of Motor Involvement in Literal and Metaphoric Action Sentence Processing: A TMS Study.字面和隐喻动作句处理中运动参与的时间进程:一项经颅磁刺激研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 26;10:371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00371. eCollection 2019.
7
"Passion" versus "patience": the effects of valence and arousal on constructive word recognition.“激情”与“耐心”:效价和唤醒度对建设性词汇识别的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Sep;33(6):1302-1309. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1561419. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
8
Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.量化感觉运动体验:9000 多个英语单词的身体-物体相互作用评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):453-466. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1171-z.
9
Do Patients With Depression Prefer Literal or Metaphorical Expressions for Internal States? Evidence From Sentence Completion and Elicited Production.抑郁症患者对内心情态更倾向于直白表达还是隐喻表达?来自句子完成任务和引发式产出的证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 15;9:1326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01326. eCollection 2018.
10
Interoception: the forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts.内感受:抽象和具体概念的知觉基础中被遗忘的模态。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0143.