Suppr超能文献

体层摄影术在活体牙体积测量中的有效性。

The validity of in vivo tooth volume determinations from cone-beam computed tomography.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):160-6. doi: 10.2319/121608-639.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of volumetric analysis of teeth in vivo using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The physical volume (Vw) of 24 bicuspids extracted for orthodontic purposes (16 were imaged with the I-CAT and 8 with the CB MercuRay) were determined using the water displacement technique. Corresponding pretreatment CBCT image data were uploaded into Amira 4.0 for segmentation and radiographic volume (Va). All measurements were performed twice by two observers. The statistical difference between Vw and Va was assessed using a paired t-test. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The overall mean Vw of teeth specimens was 0.553 +/- 0.082 cm3, while the overall mean Va was 0.548 +/- 0.079 cm3 (0.529 +/- 0.078 cm3 for observer 1 and 0.567 +/- 0.085 cm3 for observer 2). There were statistically significant differences between Va and Vw (P < .05). Between observer 1 and observer 2, Va measurements were statistically significantly different (P < .05). The interobserver and intraobserver correlation coefficient for Vw was high. Lastly, surface smoothing reduced the volume by 3% to 12%.

CONCLUSIONS

In vivo determination of tooth volumes from CBCT data is feasible. The measurements slightly deviate from the physical volumes within -4% to 7%. Smoothing operations reduce volume measurements. Currently, no requirements for accuracy of volumetric determinations of tooth volume have been established.

摘要

目的

通过锥形束 CT(CBCT)确定活体牙齿容积分析的准确性。

材料与方法

使用排水法,确定 24 颗因正畸需要拔除的双尖牙的实际体积(Vw)(16 颗使用 I-CAT 成像,8 颗使用 CB MercuRay 成像)。将相应的预处理 CBCT 图像数据上传至 Amira 4.0 进行分割和射线照相体积(Va)。所有测量均由两名观察者进行两次。使用配对 t 检验评估 Vw 和 Va 之间的统计学差异。通过计算 Pearson 相关系数和组内相关系数来确定观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。

结果

牙齿标本的总体平均 Vw 为 0.553 +/- 0.082 cm3,而总体平均 Va 为 0.548 +/- 0.079 cm3(观察者 1 为 0.529 +/- 0.078 cm3,观察者 2 为 0.567 +/- 0.085 cm3)。Va 和 Vw 之间存在统计学差异(P <.05)。观察者 1 和观察者 2 之间,Va 测量值存在统计学差异(P <.05)。Vw 的观察者内和观察者间相关系数较高。最后,表面平滑处理使体积减少了 3%至 12%。

结论

从 CBCT 数据中活体确定牙齿体积是可行的。测量值与实际体积相差在-4%至 7%以内。平滑操作会减少体积测量值。目前,尚未建立对牙齿体积容积测定准确性的要求。

相似文献

5
Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.锥形束计算机断层扫描牙科测量的可靠性和准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jul;136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.016.

引用本文的文献

8

本文引用的文献

5
The evolution of digital study models.
J Clin Orthod. 2007 Sep;41(9):557-61; quiz 424.
7
Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.锥形束CT与多层螺旋CT骨分割质量的评估:一项初步研究。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Aug;102(2):225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.039. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
8
Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup.三维数字建模与设置。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):605-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验