• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺体积大于 175 克的前列腺增生。

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for prostates larger than 175 grams.

机构信息

Methodist Hospital Institute for Kidney Stone Disease, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2010 Mar;24(3):433-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0147.

DOI:10.1089/end.2009.0147
PMID:19852722
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Open simple prostatectomy has been considered the treatment of choice for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) of large prostates because traditional endoscopic techniques have not proven either effective or feasible. We present our experience with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for glands >175 cc.

METHODS

An Institutional Review Board approved prospective database has been maintained since January 1999 for all HoLEP procedures. The database was reviewed retrospectively for patients who underwent HoLEP for BPH with a preoperative transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) volume of >175 cc.

RESULTS

From January 1999 to November 2008, we identified 57 patients with a mean pretreatment TRUS volume of 217.8 cc (range 175-391 cc). Preoperative retention was present in 30 patients. Preoperative mean prostate-specific antigen level was 14.6 ng/mL, mean American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index was 19.0, and mean peak flow (Qmax) was 8.2 mL/sec. Mean hospital stay was 26 hours, and postoperative catheterization was 18.5 hours (range 6-96 hrs). All patients were able to void after catheter removal. Mean enucleated tissue weight was 176.4 g (range 48-532.2 g). At 6-month follow-up, AUA symptom index was 6.5, mean PSA level was 0.78 ng/mL, and Qmax was 18.5. During the follow-up period, no patient needed catheterization or had persistent incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the large prostate gland, HoLEP provides a satisfactory outcome with low morbidity. HoLEP is the only endoscopic technique that allows for tissue removal comparable to that of open prostatectomy for such patients.

摘要

背景与目的

开放式单纯前列腺切除术已被认为是治疗大前列腺症状性良性前列腺增生(BPH)的首选方法,因为传统的内镜技术既没有被证明是有效或可行的。我们介绍了我们在前列腺钬激光剜除术(HoLEP)治疗 >175cc 腺体方面的经验。

方法

自 1999 年 1 月以来,我们为所有 HoLEP 手术维护了一个机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性数据库。我们对接受 HoLEP 治疗 BPH 且术前经直肠超声(TRUS)体积 >175cc 的患者的数据库进行了回顾性分析。

结果

从 1999 年 1 月到 2008 年 11 月,我们共发现 57 例患者,平均术前 TRUS 体积为 217.8cc(范围 175-391cc)。术前有 30 例存在尿潴留。术前平均前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平为 14.6ng/ml,平均美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)症状指数为 19.0,平均最大尿流率(Qmax)为 8.2ml/sec。平均住院时间为 26 小时,术后导尿管留置时间为 18.5 小时(范围 6-96 小时)。所有患者在去除导尿管后均可自行排尿。平均切除的组织重量为 176.4g(范围 48-532.2g)。在 6 个月的随访中,AUA 症状指数为 6.5,平均 PSA 水平为 0.78ng/ml,Qmax 为 18.5。在随访期间,没有患者需要再次导尿或出现持续性尿失禁。

结论

即使在大前列腺中,HoLEP 也能提供令人满意的结果,且发病率低。HoLEP 是唯一一种允许对这些患者进行与开放式前列腺切除术相当的组织切除的内镜技术。

相似文献

1
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for prostates larger than 175 grams.钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺体积大于 175 克的前列腺增生。
J Endourol. 2010 Mar;24(3):433-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0147.
2
Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia cases - a medium term, prospective, randomized comparison.经尿道双极等离子前列腺剜除术与开放性前列腺切除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生症的中期前瞻性随机对照研究。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):793-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11730.x. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
3
Feasibility of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for recurrent/residual benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)治疗复发性/残留良性前列腺增生(BPH)的可行性。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E845-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11290.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
4
Mid term outcomes of initial 250 case experience with GreenLight 120W-HPS photoselective vaporization prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of prostate volumes < 60 cc, 60 cc-100 cc and > 100 cc.采用绿激光120W高功率选择性汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生症的首批250例病例的中期结果:前列腺体积<60立方厘米、60立方厘米-100立方厘米和>100立方厘米的比较
Can J Urol. 2012 Oct;19(5):6450-8.
5
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for persistent lower urinary tract symptoms after prior benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery.钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生术后持续下尿路症状。
Urology. 2013 May;81(5):1025-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
6
Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate compared with transvesical open prostatectomy: 18-month follow-up of a randomized trial.经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术与经膀胱开放性前列腺切除术的比较:一项随机试验的18个月随访
J Endourol. 2004 Mar;18(2):189-91. doi: 10.1089/089277904322959851.
7
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for prostates of >125 mL.钬激光剜除术治疗体积大于125毫升的前列腺。
BJU Int. 2006 Jan;97(1):81-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05898.x.
8
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial.钬激光前列腺剜除术与开放性前列腺切除术治疗100克以上前列腺的比较:一项随机临床试验的5年随访结果
Eur Urol. 2008 Jan;53(1):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.08.036. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
9
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate--outcomes independent of prostate size?钬激光前列腺剜除术——手术结果与前列腺大小无关?
J Urol. 2008 Dec;180(6):2431-5; discussion 2435. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.019. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
10
Same-Day Discharge Following Holmium Laser Enucleation in Patients Assessed to Have Large Gland Prostates (≥175 cc).大体积前列腺(≥175cc)患者行钬激光前列腺剜除术后当日出院评估。
J Endourol. 2021 Sep;35(9):1386-1392. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.1218. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate Cancer and the Rise of Focal Laser Therapies: A Narrative Review of Benefits and Limitations.前列腺癌与聚焦激光治疗的兴起:益处与局限性的叙述性综述
J Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jun 9;16:e16. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2025.16. eCollection 2025.
2
Influence of preoperative indwelling urinary catheter on outcomes of high-power holmium laser enucleation for very large prostate (≥ 200 mL).术前留置导尿管对超大前列腺(≥200 mL)行高功率钬激光剜除术效果的影响。
World J Urol. 2025 Apr 14;43(1):223. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05624-2.
3
Relationship Between Prostate Size and Urinary Incontinence After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Prospective Registry-Based Patient Cohort Study Under Regular Follow-up Protocol.
前列腺钬激光剜除术后前列腺大小与尿失禁的关系:基于前瞻性登记的患者队列研究,采用常规随访方案
Int Neurourol J. 2025 Mar;29(1):17-26. doi: 10.5213/inj.2448408.204. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
HoLEP versus ThuFLEP in men with very large prostates (> 175 ml).大体积前列腺(>175毫升)男性患者中钬激光前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺双极等离子剜除术的比较
World J Urol. 2025 Feb 7;43(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05478-8.
5
Safety and feasibility of En-bloc holmium laser enucleation for very large prostates (> 200 cc) with trainee involvement.在实习医生参与下,整块钬激光剜除术治疗体积非常大的前列腺(>200 cc)的安全性和可行性。
BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 20;6(1):e469. doi: 10.1002/bco2.469. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Comparison of outcomes in patients with and without neurologic diseases undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.患有和未患有神经系统疾病的患者接受钬激光前列腺剜除术的结局比较。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Aug;18(8):255-261. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8683.
7
High-power holmium laser versus thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in patients with glands larger than 80 ml: Results from the Prostate Endoscopic EnucLeation study group.高功率钬激光与铥光纤激光用于前列腺体积大于80毫升患者的内镜下前列腺剜除术:前列腺内镜剜除研究组的结果
Prostate Int. 2024 Mar;12(1):40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.12.001. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
8
Incidence of complications and urinary incontinence following endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in men with a prostate volume of 80 ml and above: results from a multicenter, real-world experience of 2512 patients.80ml 及以上前列腺体积的男性患者经内镜前列腺切除术的并发症和尿失禁发生率:来自 2512 例患者的多中心真实世界经验。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 20;42(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04886-6.
9
Ambulatory surgery for Moses™ holmium laser enucleation of the prostate A prospective, real-practice study from a single center.摩西™钬激光前列腺剜除术的门诊手术:一项来自单一中心的前瞻性实际应用研究
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Aug;17(8):E228-E235. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8229.
10
Laser enucleation of the prostate in men with very large glands ≥175 ml: A systematic review.前列腺体积≥175毫升的男性患者行激光前列腺剜除术:一项系统评价。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jul 31;80:104279. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104279. eCollection 2022 Aug.