Taube Sheila E, Clark Gary M, Dancey Janet E, McShane Lisa M, Sigman Caroline C, Gutman Steven I
ST-Consulting, PO Box 260, Glen Echo, MD 20812-0260, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Nov 4;101(21):1453-63. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp334. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
A workshop sponsored by the National Cancer Institute and the US Food and Drug Administration addressed past lessons learned and ongoing challenges faced in biomarker development and drug and biomarker codevelopment. Participants agreed that critical decision points in the product life cycle depend on the level of understanding of the biology of the target and its interaction with the drug, the preanalytical and analytical factors affecting biomarker assay performance, and the clinical disease process. The more known about the biology and the greater the strength of association between an analytical signal and clinical result, the more efficient and less risky the development process will be. Rapid entry into clinical practice will only be achieved by using a rigorous scientific approach, including careful specimen collection and standardized and quality-controlled data collection. Early interaction with appropriate regulatory bodies will ensure studies are appropriately designed and biomarker test performance is well characterized.
由美国国立癌症研究所和美国食品药品监督管理局主办的一个研讨会探讨了生物标志物开发以及药物与生物标志物共同开发方面过去吸取的经验教训和当前面临的挑战。与会者一致认为,产品生命周期中的关键决策点取决于对靶点生物学及其与药物相互作用的了解程度、影响生物标志物检测性能的分析前和分析因素,以及临床疾病进程。对生物学了解得越多,分析信号与临床结果之间的关联强度越大,开发过程就会越高效且风险越小。只有采用严谨的科学方法,包括仔细的样本采集以及标准化和质量控制的数据收集,才能迅速进入临床实践。尽早与合适的监管机构互动将确保研究设计得当,且生物标志物检测性能得到充分表征。