Second Medical Division of Bellevue Hospital and the Physiological Laboratory of Cornell University Medical College, New York City.
J Exp Med. 1917 Jan 1;25(1):1-19. doi: 10.1084/jem.25.1.1.
While auricular fibrillation is easily recognized by arterial and jugular tracings or by electrocardiograms, it is not possible to interpret all the waves found in these records. The venous tracings may in general be placed in one of two classes: (a) those in which prominent systolic waves predominate or occur alone; and (b) those in which large or small diastolic waves occur occasionally, in groups, or in a continued series averaging 250 to 500 per minute. The prominent systolic waves have generally been attributed to tricuspid regurgitation, the inference being that tricuspid regurgitation is a common state in auricular fibrillation. The diastolic waves are so numerous and so many electrocardiograms show diastolic waves that it is impossible to account for them on the assumption that the auricle is in a dilated and finely fibrillating state. It has been suggested that in these instances a condition of coarse fibrillation, which is closely allied to auricular flutter, obtains. The systolic and diastolic waves of the venous pulse of twenty-five clinical cases of auricular fibrillation, recorded by photographic methods, were studied. Six types of systolic waves (Text-Fig. 1) were found: (1) an intensified impact wave, the most common and often the only characteristic feature, indicating vigorous ventricular action; (2) a peaked impact followed by a rapid systolic drop due to light pressure of the tambour; (3) the intra-auricular type of systolic variation, so called from its resemblance to intra-auricular pressure curves found in animals, occurring in clinical cases only when ventricular systole is weak; (4) double systolic waves, attributed to a systolic tug of the ventricle on the auricles and large veins; (5) a systolic impact followed by a stasis wave, present when intravenous pressure is high; (6) a regurgitation wave composed of a steep rise continued into a systolic plateau with murmur vibrations superimposed. Our study showed (1) that tricuspid regurgitation, as indicated by the presence of regurgitation waves, is a rare accompaniment of auricular fibrillation; and (2) that the contrary opinion, arrived at by the frequent presence in polygraph tracings of ventricular types of waves, is due to the fact that the contour of intensified impact waves is distorted by polygraph levers so that they simulate regurgitation waves. Recurrent diastolic waves were frequently present in our records. Their relative size depended, to a considerable extent, on the pressure of the tambour. There was no constant relation to similar waves in the recorded electrocardiogram, nor is it proven that they are indicative of a coarse type of fibrillation or an associated flutter.
虽然通过动脉和颈静脉描记或心电图很容易识别心房颤动,但并非所有在这些记录中发现的波都可以解释。静脉描记通常可以分为两类:(a) 主导收缩波占主导或单独出现的描记;(b) 偶尔出现大或小的舒张波,成群出现或连续出现,平均每分钟 250 至 500 次。明显的收缩波通常归因于三尖瓣反流,推断三尖瓣反流是心房颤动的常见状态。舒张波如此之多,许多心电图显示舒张波,以至于如果假设心房处于扩张和细颤状态,就不可能解释它们。有人认为,在这些情况下,一种与心房扑动密切相关的粗糙颤动状态存在。通过摄影方法记录的 25 例心房颤动的临床病例的静脉脉冲的收缩和舒张波进行了研究。发现了六种类型的收缩波(图 1):(1) 增强的冲击波,最常见且通常是唯一的特征,表明心室活动有力;(2) 一个高峰冲击波,随后由于鼓风的轻压力快速收缩下降;(3) 所谓的室内压力型收缩变化,其特征类似于在动物中发现的室内压力曲线,仅在心室收缩较弱时出现在临床病例中;(4) 双收缩波,归因于心室对心房和大静脉的收缩牵引;(5) 收缩冲击后出现停滞波,当静脉压升高时出现;(6) 反流波由陡峭上升组成,继续进入收缩平台,叠加有杂音振动。我们的研究表明:(1) 正如反流波所表明的那样,三尖瓣反流是心房颤动的罕见伴随物;(2) 相反的观点,即多导记录仪描记中经常出现心室波类型,是由于强化冲击波的轮廓被多导记录仪杠杆扭曲,从而模拟反流波所致。在我们的记录中,反复出现舒张波。它们的相对大小在很大程度上取决于鼓风的压力。它们与记录心电图中的类似波没有固定关系,也不能证明它们表示粗糙颤动或相关扑动。