Jang Woo Ri, Nahm Chung Hyun, Kim Jung Hee, Lim Dae Hyun, Jang Tae Young, Moon Yeon Sook, Kim Jin Ju
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Korean J Lab Med. 2009 Oct;29(5):465-72. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.5.465.
The in vivo skin prick test (SPT) or in vitro detection of allergen specific IgE in serum is commonly used for the diagnosis of allergic disease. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of a new multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST) immunoblot assay, Polycheck Allergy (Biocheck GmbH, Germany).
A total of 100 patients with clinical findings of allergic diseases were tested by SPT and three different MAST assays: Polycheck Allergy (Biocheck GmbH, Germany), MAST CLA allergy system (Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics, USA) and Allergy Screen (R-biopharm, Germany). The results of MAST assays were compared with those of SPT.
Concordance rates of MAST assays with SPT were 79-100% for Polycheck Allergy, 88.9-100% for MAST CLA and 72.7-98.3% for Allergy Screen. In ROC curve analysis, significant differences were observed in four of 25 allergens analysed: Alternaria, Birch, Hazelnut and D. farinae. For Alternaria and Birch, Polycheck Allergy (P<0.001) and Allergy Screen (P=0.0075) showed significantly larger AUC (area under the curve) than MAST CLA. For Hazelnut, Polycheck Allergy (P=0.0021), and for D. farinae, MAST CLA (P=0.015) showed significantly larger AUCs than the other two tests. The ROC analysis for overall 16 food allergens showed better results in Polycheck Allergy (P<0.001), and that for overall 21 inhalants did not show significant differences among three MAST assays (P>0.05).
Since Polycheck Allergy showed similar or superior result to the others, it can be used for the detection of allergen specific IgE antibodies.
体内皮肤点刺试验(SPT)或体外检测血清中过敏原特异性IgE常用于过敏性疾病的诊断。在本研究中,我们评估了一种新型多过敏原同步检测(MAST)免疫印迹法——Polycheck Allergy(德国Biocheck GmbH公司)的实用性。
对100例有过敏性疾病临床表现的患者进行SPT检测,并采用三种不同的MAST检测方法:Polycheck Allergy(德国Biocheck GmbH公司)、MAST CLA过敏检测系统(美国日立化学诊断公司)和Allergy Screen(德国R - 生物制药公司)。将MAST检测结果与SPT结果进行比较。
Polycheck Allergy与SPT的一致性率为79% - 100%,MAST CLA为88.9% - 100%,Allergy Screen为72.7% - 98.3%。在ROC曲线分析中,在所分析的25种过敏原中的4种观察到显著差异:链格孢属、桦树、榛子和粉尘螨。对于链格孢属和桦树,Polycheck Allergy(P<0.001)和Allergy Screen(P = 0.0075)的曲线下面积(AUC)显著大于MAST CLA。对于榛子,Polycheck Allergy(P = 0.0021),对于粉尘螨,MAST CLA(P = 0.015)的AUC显著大于其他两种检测方法。对16种食物过敏原的总体ROC分析显示,Polycheck Allergy的结果更好(P<0.001),对21种吸入性过敏原的总体分析显示,三种MAST检测方法之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。
由于Polycheck Allergy的结果与其他方法相似或更优,它可用于检测过敏原特异性IgE抗体。