• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多阈值诊断试验的多变量随机效应荟萃分析。

Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC - Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Nov 10;9:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-73.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-9-73
PMID:19903336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2787531/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests is becoming a well established approach when studies present one two-by-two table or one pair of sensitivity and specificity. When studies present multiple thresholds for test positivity, usually meta-analysts reduce the data to a two-by-two table or take one threshold value at a time and apply the well developed meta-analytic approaches. However, this approach does not fully exploit the data.

METHODS

In this paper we generalize the bivariate random effects approach to the situation where test results are presented with k thresholds for test positivity, resulting in a 2 by (k+1) table per study. The model can be fitted with standard likelihood procedures in statistical packages such as SAS (Proc NLMIXED). We follow a multivariate random effects approach; i.e., we assume that each study estimates a study specific ROC curve that can be viewed as randomly sampled from the population of all ROC curves of such studies. In contrast to the bivariate case, where nothing can be said about the shape of study specific ROC curves without additional untestable assumptions, the multivariate model can be used to describe study specific ROC curves. The models are easily extended with study level covariates.

RESULTS

The method is illustrated using published meta-analysis data. The SAS NLMIXED syntax is given in the appendix.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the multivariate random effects meta-analysis approach is an appropriate and convenient framework to meta-analyse studies with multiple threshold without losing any information by dichotomizing the test results.

摘要

背景

当研究呈现一个两列两行的表格或一对灵敏度和特异性时,双变量随机效应荟萃分析已成为诊断测试的一种成熟方法。当研究呈现多个测试阳性的阈值时,通常荟萃分析人员会将数据简化为两列两行的表格,或者一次采用一个阈值,并应用成熟的荟萃分析方法。然而,这种方法并没有充分利用数据。

方法

在本文中,我们将双变量随机效应方法推广到研究呈现 k 个测试阳性阈值的情况,每个研究产生一个 2 乘 (k+1) 表格。该模型可以使用统计软件包(如 SAS(Proc NLMIXED))中的标准似然程序进行拟合。我们采用多元随机效应方法;也就是说,我们假设每个研究估计一个特定于研究的 ROC 曲线,可以将其视为从该研究的所有 ROC 曲线的总体中随机抽样的曲线。与双变量情况不同,在没有额外不可检验假设的情况下,无法对特定于研究的 ROC 曲线的形状进行任何说明,多元模型可用于描述特定于研究的 ROC 曲线。该模型可以轻松地与研究水平的协变量扩展。

结果

使用已发表的荟萃分析数据说明了该方法。SAS NLMIXED 语法在附录中给出。

结论

我们得出结论,多元随机效应荟萃分析方法是一种合适且方便的框架,可以对具有多个阈值的研究进行荟萃分析,而不会通过将测试结果二分法而丢失任何信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f9/2787531/6d1c523020b4/1471-2288-9-73-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f9/2787531/ccc7522cfec2/1471-2288-9-73-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f9/2787531/d48e3d2ba2c4/1471-2288-9-73-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f9/2787531/6d1c523020b4/1471-2288-9-73-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f9/2787531/ccc7522cfec2/1471-2288-9-73-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f9/2787531/d48e3d2ba2c4/1471-2288-9-73-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f9/2787531/6d1c523020b4/1471-2288-9-73-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds.多阈值诊断试验的多变量随机效应荟萃分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Nov 10;9:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-73.
2
Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.ROC曲线的双变量随机效应荟萃分析。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):621-38. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08319957. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
3
Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.在分层汇总ROC分析中生成的经验贝叶斯估计值与完全贝叶斯分析的估计值非常接近。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Sep;57(9):925-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.019.
4
A comparison of bivariate, multivariate random-effects, and Poisson correlated gamma-frailty models to meta-analyze individual patient data of ordinal scale diagnostic tests.双变量、多变量随机效应模型以及泊松相关伽马脆弱性模型在对有序量表诊断测试的个体患者数据进行Meta分析时的比较。
Biom J. 2017 Nov;59(6):1317-1338. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600184. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
5
Meta-analysis of full ROC curves using bivariate time-to-event models for interval-censored data.基于双变量时依事件模型对区间删失数据进行全 ROC 曲线的荟萃分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Mar;9(1):62-72. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1273. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
6
Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial.诊断试验多元荟萃分析的统计方法:概述与教程
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Aug;25(4):1596-619. doi: 10.1177/0962280213492588. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
7
Meta-analysis of full ROC curves with flexible parametric distributions of diagnostic test values.诊断试验值的灵活参数分布的全 ROC 曲线的 Meta 分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Mar;11(2):301-313. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1395. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
8
Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX.使用SAS PROC GLIMMIX对敏感性和特异性进行双变量随机效应荟萃分析。
Methods Inf Med. 2010;49(1):54-62, 62-4. doi: 10.3414/ME09-01-0001. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
9
A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.一种使用随机效应分布的Copula表示法对诊断试验准确性研究进行双变量Meta分析的混合效应模型。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 20;34(29):3842-65. doi: 10.1002/sim.6595. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
10
Associating explanatory variables with summary receiver operating characteristic curves in diagnostic meta-analysis.在诊断性荟萃分析中,将解释变量与汇总受试者工作特征曲线关联。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of miR-451 Expression in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.miR-451 在结直肠癌中的诊断和预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Jun 1;25(6):1903-1910. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.6.1903.
2
Two sample Mendelian Randomisation using an outcome from a multilevel model of disease progression.两样本孟德尔随机化分析使用疾病进展多层次模型的结果。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 May;39(5):521-533. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01093-2. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
3
18 F-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for lymph node staging in medium/high risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Associating explanatory variables with summary receiver operating characteristic curves in diagnostic meta-analysis.在诊断性荟萃分析中,将解释变量与汇总受试者工作特征曲线关联。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
2
A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.诊断准确性研究的Meta分析模型的统一
Biostatistics. 2009 Jan;10(1):201-3. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn040. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
3
Meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: a comparison of random intercept, normal-normal, and binomial-normal bivariate summary ROC approaches.
18F-前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描用于中/高危前列腺癌淋巴结分期:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Apr 20;137(8):949-958. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002850. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
4
Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds for data integration.多阈值数据集成的诊断试验准确性研究的荟萃分析。
Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022083. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2022083. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
5
Meta-analysis of dichotomous and ordinal tests with an imperfect gold standard.基于不完全金标准的二分类和有序资料Meta 分析
Res Synth Methods. 2022 Sep;13(5):595-611. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1567. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
6
Clinical utility of serum fucosylated fraction of alpha-fetoprotein in the diagnostic of hepatocellular carcinoma: a comprehensive analysis with large sample size.血清甲胎蛋白岩藻糖化部分在肝细胞癌诊断中的临床实用性:大样本量的综合分析。
Aging (Albany NY). 2022 Mar 20;14(6):2645-2664. doi: 10.18632/aging.203963.
7
Microbiota Emergencies in the Diagnosis of Lung Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.微生物组紧急情况在肺部疾病诊断中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Sep 21;11:709634. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.709634. eCollection 2021.
8
The Diagnostic Value of Exosome-Derived Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Meta-Analysis.外泌体衍生生物标志物在阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍中的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Mar 1;13:637218. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.637218. eCollection 2021.
9
Diagnostic Value of Telomerase Activity in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test.端粒酶活性在膀胱癌患者中的诊断价值:一项诊断试验的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 3;10:570127. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.570127. eCollection 2020.
10
Can Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography provide an accurate lymph node staging for patients with medium/high risk prostate cancer? A diagnostic meta-analysis.Ga-前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描能否为中高危前列腺癌患者提供准确的淋巴结分期?一项诊断性荟萃分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 1;15(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01675-4.
诊断性研究的Meta分析:随机截距、正态-正态及二项分布-正态双变量汇总ROC方法的比较
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):639-49. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08323917. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
4
Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.ROC曲线的双变量随机效应荟萃分析。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):621-38. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08319957. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
5
The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability.荟萃分析的二项分布更适合用于模拟研究内的变异性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;61(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
6
Multivariate random-effects approach: for meta-analysis of cancer staging studies.多变量随机效应方法:用于癌症分期研究的荟萃分析。
Acad Radiol. 2007 Aug;14(8):974-84. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.05.007.
7
Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and the estimation of between-study correlation.双变量随机效应荟萃分析及研究间相关性估计
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jan 12;7:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-3.
8
Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach.稀疏数据下灵敏度和特异度的双变量Meta分析:一种广义线性混合模型方法
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1331-2; author reply 1332-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
9
A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.诊断准确性研究的Meta分析模型的统一
Biostatistics. 2007 Apr;8(2):239-51. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxl004. Epub 2006 May 11.
10
Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.在诊断评估中,对敏感性和特异性进行双变量分析可得出有用的汇总指标。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;58(10):982-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022.