Institute of Cognitive Neurology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Mar;51(4):725-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
Recently (Roca et al. (2010), we used the relationship with general intelligence (Spearman's g) to define two sets of frontal lobe or "executive" tests. For one group, including Wisconsin card sorting and verbal fluency, reduction in g entirely explained the deficits found in frontal patients. For another group, including tests of social cognition and multitasking, frontal deficits remained even after correction for g. Preliminary evidence suggested a link of the latter tasks to more anterior frontal regions. Here we develop this distinction in the context of behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), a disorder which progressively affects frontal lobe cortices. In bvFTD, some executive tests, including tests of social cognition and multitasking, decline from the early stage of the disease, while others, including classical executive tests such as Wisconsin card sorting, verbal fluency or Trail Making Test part B, show deficits only later on. Here we show that, while deficits in the classical executive tests are entirely explained by g, deficits in the social cognition and multitasking tests are not. The results suggest a relatively selective cognitive deficit at mild stages of the disease, followed by more widespread cognitive decline well predicted by g.
最近(Roca 等人,2010 年),我们使用与一般智力(Spearman 的 g)的关系来定义两组额叶或“执行”测试。对于一组包括威斯康星卡片分类和言语流畅性的测试,g 的减少完全解释了额叶患者的缺陷。对于另一组包括社会认知和多重任务测试的测试,即使在 g 校正后,额叶缺陷仍然存在。初步证据表明后者与更靠前的额叶区域有关。在这里,我们在行为变异额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)的背景下发展了这种区别,这是一种逐渐影响额叶皮层的疾病。在 bvFTD 中,一些执行测试,包括社会认知和多重任务测试,从疾病的早期阶段开始下降,而其他测试,包括经典的执行测试,如威斯康星卡片分类、言语流畅性或 Trailmaking 测试 B 部分,仅在后期才出现缺陷。我们发现,虽然经典执行测试的缺陷完全可以用 g 来解释,但社会认知和多重任务测试的缺陷则不能。结果表明,在疾病的轻度阶段存在相对选择性的认知缺陷,随后是 g 很好预测的更广泛的认知下降。