• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错觉中的草率结论偏差:特异性和可变性。

The jumping to conclusions bias in delusions: specificity and changeability.

机构信息

Section for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Feb;119(1):40-9. doi: 10.1037/a0018118.

DOI:10.1037/a0018118
PMID:20141241
Abstract

There are indications that a jumping to conclusions bias (JTC) plays a role in the formation and maintenance of delusions and should be targeted in therapy. However, it is unclear whether (a) JTC is uniquely associated with delusions or simply an epiphenomenon of schizophrenia or impaired intellectual functioning and (b) it can be changed by varying task demands, motivational factors, or feedback. Seventy-one patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and either acute or remitted delusions and 68 healthy controls were included. Patients were assessed with self- and observer-rated symptom measures. All participants were assessed for intellectual ability and performed the classic beads task with a ratio of 80:20. They were then presented with task variations that involved increasing the difficulty of the ratio to 60:40, introducing a rule for which correct decisions were rewarded by monetary gains and false decisions led to financial losses, and providing feedback on the accuracy of the previous decisions. Participants with current delusional symptoms took fewer draws to decision (DTD) than did those in remission and healthy controls. DTD were associated with observer-rated delusions, but controlling for negative symptoms or intelligence rendered this association insignificant. DTD increased after the difficulty of the task increased and after feedback. The study demonstrated that JTC is linked to delusions but that this association is not unique. Patients with delusions are principally able to adapt their decisions to altered conditions but still decide relatively quickly even when decisions have negative consequences. These difficulties might stem in part from impaired intellectual functioning.

摘要

有迹象表明,仓促下结论的偏见(JTC)在妄想的形成和维持中起作用,应该在治疗中针对这一偏见进行治疗。然而,目前尚不清楚(a)JTC 是否仅与妄想有关,还是仅仅是精神分裂症或认知功能障碍的一种表现,以及(b)是否可以通过改变任务要求、动机因素或反馈来改变 JTC。研究纳入了 71 名精神分裂症谱系障碍患者,这些患者存在急性或缓解期的妄想,同时纳入了 68 名健康对照者。患者接受了自我和观察者评定的症状评估。所有参与者都接受了智力评估,并进行了经典的珠子任务,比率为 80:20。然后,他们接受了不同的任务变化,包括将比率增加到 60:40,引入一个规则,即正确的决策会得到金钱奖励,错误的决策会导致财务损失,并对之前决策的准确性提供反馈。有当前妄想症状的参与者比缓解期和健康对照组的参与者做出的决策更少。决策时间(DTD)与观察者评定的妄想有关,但控制了阴性症状或智力后,这种关联就变得不显著了。当任务难度增加和反馈后,DTD 增加了。该研究表明,JTC 与妄想有关,但这种关联并不是独特的。有妄想的患者主要能够根据改变的条件来调整他们的决策,但即使决策有负面影响,他们仍然会相对较快地做出决策。这些困难可能部分源于认知功能障碍。

相似文献

1
The jumping to conclusions bias in delusions: specificity and changeability.错觉中的草率结论偏差:特异性和可变性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Feb;119(1):40-9. doi: 10.1037/a0018118.
2
The cognitive and affective structure of paranoid delusions: a transdiagnostic investigation of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and depression.偏执妄想的认知与情感结构:对精神分裂症谱系障碍和抑郁症患者的跨诊断研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;66(3):236-47. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.1.
3
Change in delusions is associated with change in "jumping to conclusions".妄想的变化与“草率结论”的变化有关。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Dec 30;170(2-3):124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.10.020. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
4
Theory of mind deficits in chronic schizophrenia: evidence for state dependence.慢性精神分裂症的心理理论缺陷:状态依赖性证据
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Feb 28;158(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.05.018. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
5
Cognitive functioning in delusions: a longitudinal analysis.妄想中的认知功能:一项纵向分析。
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Apr;44(4):481-514. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.03.008.
6
Confabulation in schizophrenia and its relationship to clinical and neuropsychological features of the disorder.精神分裂症中的虚构及其与该疾病临床和神经心理学特征的关系。
Psychol Med. 2007 Oct;37(10):1403-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000566. Epub 2007 May 17.
7
Decision making under uncertainty and mood induction: further evidence for liberal acceptance in schizophrenia.不确定性决策和心境诱导:精神分裂症中自由接纳的进一步证据。
Psychol Med. 2009 Nov;39(11):1821-9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709005923. Epub 2009 May 11.
8
Hasty decision-making in a variety of tasks: does it contribute to the development of delusions?在各种任务中仓促做决策:这是否会导致妄想的形成?
Psychol Psychother. 2008 Sep;81(Pt 3):237-45. doi: 10.1348/147608308X297104. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
9
Can delusions be self-assessed? Concordance between self- and observer-rated delusions in schizophrenia.妄想能否自我评估?精神分裂症中自我报告和观察者评定妄想的一致性。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jul 30;178(2):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.04.019. Epub 2010 May 16.
10
Hopping, skipping or jumping to conclusions? Clarifying the role of the JTC bias in delusions.仓促、轻率地下结论?澄清联合型思维偏差在妄想中的作用。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2007 Jan;12(1):46-77. doi: 10.1080/13546800600750597.

引用本文的文献

1
Cannabis use and cognitive biases in people with first-episode psychosis and their siblings.首发精神病患者及其亲属的大麻使用与认知偏差
Psychol Med. 2024 Nov 22;54(15):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001715.
2
Jumping to Conclusions and Its Associations With Psychotic Experiences in Preadolescent Children at Familial High Risk of Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder-The Danish High Risk and Resilience Study, VIA 11.早发性精神分裂症或双相情感障碍家族高危儿童的跳跃结论及其与精神病体验的关联——丹麦高危和复原力研究,VIA11。
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Nov 18;48(6):1363-1372. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac060.
3
Unstable Belief Formation and Slowed Decision-making: Evidence That the Jumping-to-Conclusions Bias in Schizophrenia Is Not Linked to Impulsive Decision-making.
不稳定的信念形成和决策迟缓:精神分裂症中跳跃式结论偏差与冲动决策无关的证据。
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Mar 1;48(2):347-358. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab108.
4
Decision-making ability, psychopathology, and brain connectivity.决策能力、精神病理学和大脑连接。
Neuron. 2021 Jun 16;109(12):2025-2040.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.04.019. Epub 2021 May 20.
5
Rethinking delusions: A selective review of delusion research through a computational lens.重新思考妄想:通过计算视角对妄想研究的选择性回顾。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Jul;245:23-41. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.01.023. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
6
Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial.在使用鱼类任务评估精神病患者 JTC 偏倚时存在的问题:一项随机对照试验基线评估的二次分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02959-5.
7
Thinking Preferences and Conspiracy Belief: Intuitive Thinking and the Jumping to Conclusions-Bias as a Basis for the Belief in Conspiracy Theories.思维偏好与阴谋论信念:直觉思维以及急于下结论偏差作为相信阴谋论的基础
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 18;11:568942. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.568942. eCollection 2020.
8
Relationship between jumping to conclusions and clinical outcomes in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis.临床精神病高危人群中结论推断与临床结局的关系。
Psychol Med. 2022 Jun;52(8):1569-1577. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003396. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
9
Altered subcortical emotional salience processing differentiates Parkinson's patients with and without psychotic symptoms.改变的皮质下情绪显著性加工区分了有和无精神病症状的帕金森病患者。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;27:102277. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102277. Epub 2020 May 30.
10
Jumping to conclusions, general intelligence, and psychosis liability: findings from the multi-centre EU-GEI case-control study.草率下结论、一般智力与精神病倾向:来自多中心欧盟-基因-环境相互作用研究的结果。
Psychol Med. 2021 Mar;51(4):623-633. doi: 10.1017/S003329171900357X. Epub 2020 Apr 24.