• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩和猩猩在两项空间记忆任务中使用特征和空间线索。

Bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orang utans use feature and spatial cues in two spatial memory tasks.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TU, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2010 May;13(3):419-30. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0291-3. Epub 2009 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-009-0291-3
PMID:19908074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2853697/
Abstract

Animals commonly use feature and spatial strategies when remembering places of interest such as food sources or hiding places. We conducted three experiments with great apes to investigate strategy preferences and factors that may shape them. In the first experiment, we trained 17 apes to remember 12 different food locations on the floor of their sleeping room. The 12 food locations were associated with one feature cue, so that feature and spatial cues were confounded. In a single test session, we brought the cues into conflict and found that apes, irrespective of species, showed a preference for a feature strategy. In the second experiment, we used a similar procedure and trained 25 apes to remember one food location on a platform in front of them. On average, apes preferred to use a feature strategy but some individuals relied on a spatial strategy. In the final experiment, we investigated whether training might influence strategy preferences. We tested 21 apes in the platform set-up and found that apes used both, feature and spatial strategies irrespective of training. We conclude that apes can use feature and spatial strategies to remember the location of hidden food items, but that task demands (e.g. different numbers of search locations) can influence strategy preferences. We found no evidence, however, for the role of training in shaping these preferences.

摘要

动物在记忆感兴趣的地方(如食物来源或藏身之处)时,通常会使用特征和空间策略。我们通过三个实验来研究大型猿类的策略偏好以及可能影响这些偏好的因素。在第一个实验中,我们训练了 17 只猿类记住它们睡觉房间地板上的 12 个不同的食物位置。这 12 个食物位置与一个特征线索相关联,因此特征和空间线索是混淆的。在一次单独的测试中,我们引入了冲突线索,发现无论物种如何,猿类都表现出对特征策略的偏好。在第二个实验中,我们使用了类似的程序,训练 25 只猿类记住它们面前平台上的一个食物位置。平均而言,猿类更喜欢使用特征策略,但有些个体依赖于空间策略。在最后一个实验中,我们研究了训练是否会影响策略偏好。我们在平台设置中测试了 21 只猿类,发现无论训练如何,它们都使用特征和空间策略。我们得出的结论是,猿类可以使用特征和空间策略来记忆隐藏食物的位置,但任务需求(例如不同数量的搜索位置)会影响策略偏好。然而,我们没有证据表明训练在塑造这些偏好方面的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/44cf9b2a3e6f/10071_2009_291_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/8e30593bc386/10071_2009_291_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/d2581c69693d/10071_2009_291_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/134ebd422104/10071_2009_291_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/4bea5d852e99/10071_2009_291_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/a90bb984b6cb/10071_2009_291_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/b2cfacb17162/10071_2009_291_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/44cf9b2a3e6f/10071_2009_291_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/8e30593bc386/10071_2009_291_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/d2581c69693d/10071_2009_291_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/134ebd422104/10071_2009_291_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/4bea5d852e99/10071_2009_291_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/a90bb984b6cb/10071_2009_291_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/b2cfacb17162/10071_2009_291_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4089/2853697/44cf9b2a3e6f/10071_2009_291_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orang utans use feature and spatial cues in two spatial memory tasks.倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩和猩猩在两项空间记忆任务中使用特征和空间线索。
Anim Cogn. 2010 May;13(3):419-30. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0291-3. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
2
Differences in between-reinforcer value modulate the selective-value effect in great apes (Pan troglodytes, P. Paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo abelii).强化物之间的价值差异调节了大猩猩(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)的选择性价值效应。
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Feb;130(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/com0000014. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
3
Apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, P. troglodytes, Pongo abelii) versus corvids (Corvus corax, C. corone) in a support task: the effect of pattern and functionality.在一项支持任务中猿类(大猩猩、倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)与鸦科鸟类(渡鸦、小嘴乌鸦)的比较:图案和功能性的影响
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Nov;126(4):355-67. doi: 10.1037/a0028050. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
4
The limits of endowment effects in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus).大型猿类(矮黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、红毛猩猩)禀赋效应的局限性
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Nov;125(4):436-45. doi: 10.1037/a0024516. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
5
Great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo abelii) follow visual trails to locate hidden food.大猩猩(倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、大猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩)通过视觉线索来寻找隐藏的食物。
J Comp Psychol. 2014 May;128(2):199-208. doi: 10.1037/a0035434.
6
No evidence of what-where-when memory in great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Pongo abelii, and Gorilla gorilla).在大型猿类(黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩、猩猩和大猩猩)中没有关于什么-哪里-何时记忆的证据。
J Comp Psychol. 2020 May;134(2):252-261. doi: 10.1037/com0000215. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
7
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.大猩猩(黑猩猩、红毛猩猩、倭黑猩猩、大猩猩)在反向奖励 contingency 任务 II 中的表现:向新数量的转移、长期保持以及数量比率的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):204-12. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.204.
8
Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.大猩猩(西部大猩猩、婆罗洲猩猩、倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩)之间的代币转移:物种差异、手势请求和互惠交换。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):375-84. doi: 10.1037/a0017253.
9
Great apes track hidden objects after changes in the objects' position and in subject's orientation.大型猿类会在物体位置和主体方向发生变化后追踪隐藏的物体。
Am J Primatol. 2010 Apr;72(4):349-59. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20790.
10
How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility.大猩猩(黑猩猩、红毛猩猩、倭黑猩猩和大猩猩)在反向 contingency 任务中的表现:食物数量和食物可见性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):60-70. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.60.

引用本文的文献

1
Are there disciplinary boundaries in the comparative study of primate cognition?灵长类认知的比较研究中存在学科界限吗?
Curr Res Neurobiol. 2023 May 13;4:100088. doi: 10.1016/j.crneur.2023.100088. eCollection 2023.
2
Flower bats (Glossophaga soricina) and fruit bats (Carollia perspicillata) rely on spatial cues over shapes and scents when relocating food.花蝠(Glossophaga soricina)和果蝠(Carollia perspicillata)在寻找食物时,依靠空间线索而不是形状和气味。
PLoS One. 2010 May 25;5(5):e10808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010808.

本文引用的文献

1
Figurative and spatial information and search behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris).犬类(家犬)的形象与空间信息及搜索行为
Behav Processes. 1998 Feb;42(2-3):101-6. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00071-5.
2
Learning of colour and position cues in domestic chicks: Males are better at position, females at colour.家鸡对颜色和位置线索的学习:雄性在位置学习方面表现更佳,雌性在颜色学习方面表现更佳。
Behav Processes. 1996 Jun;36(3):289-96. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00063-1.
3
Sexual differences in memory in shiny cowbirds.闪光牛鹂的记忆中的性别差异。
Anim Cogn. 1998 Oct;1(2):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s100710050011. Epub 2014 Jan 5.
4
Flexibility of cue use in the fox squirrel (Sciurus niger).狐松鼠(Sciurus niger)线索使用的灵活性
Anim Cogn. 2008 Oct;11(4):625-36. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0152-5. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
5
Flexible use of spatial cues in the southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans).北美南部飞鼠(Glaucomys volans)对空间线索的灵活运用。
Anim Cogn. 2007 Apr;10(2):203-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0059-y. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
6
Evolutionary psychology of spatial representations in the hominidae.人科动物空间表征的进化心理学
Curr Biol. 2006 Sep 5;16(17):1736-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.049.
7
Reorientation and landmark-guided search by young children: evidence for two systems.幼儿的重新定向和地标引导搜索:两种系统的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):577-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01747.x.
8
How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces.鱼类在大小不同的空间中如何进行几何定位。
Anim Cogn. 2007 Jan;10(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0029-4. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
9
Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size.在不同大小环境中通过几何和地标信息进行重新定位。
Dev Sci. 2005 Sep;8(5):393-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00427.x.
10
Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence.是否存在用于空间定向的几何模块?平方理论与证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):1-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03196346.