Suppr超能文献

造口周围皮肤疾病患者的生活质量评估。

Quality of life assessment among patients with peristomal skin disease.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Health Sciences Faculty, University of Copenhagen, Roskilde Hospital, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;22(2):139-43. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32832ca054.

Abstract

AIM

No data exist to describe how a skin problem may additionally affect the quality of life (QOL) in ostomates. We have studied the QOL in patients with peristomal skin problems and the variables that may affect it.

METHODS

A total of 141 ostomates (74 cases and 67 controls) received a set of three life quality questionnaires, that is, Short Form-36, Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Ostomy Adjustment Scale (OAS).

RESULTS

The mean DLQI score was significantly higher in cases than controls (1.7 vs. 0.8; P=0.0026) (higher scores indicating lower QOL), and the mean OAS score was significantly lower in cases than controls (151 vs. 166; P=0.0083) (lower OAS score indicating poorer adjustment/QOL). Similarly, patients with self-reported peristomal skin problem had a significantly higher mean DLQI score (2.6 vs. 0.8; P=0.004) and a significantly lower OAS score (145 vs. 163; P=0.046) than ostomates who did not report a skin problem, but were diagnosed with a skin problem by a dermatologist. The QOL scores were inversely proportional to the physician-assessed severity of the skin problem.

CONCLUSION

A small but significant negative impact on the QOL was found for ostomates with skin problems compared with ostomates without a skin problem. Similarly, ostomates with self-reported skin problems had scores indicating a lower QOL. The severity of the skin problem as assessed by the physician correlated with the QOL, ostomates with a severer skin problem had lower QOL than those with a milder skin problem.

摘要

目的

目前尚无数据描述皮肤问题如何进一步影响造口患者的生活质量(QOL)。我们研究了患有造口周围皮肤问题患者的 QOL 及其可能影响因素。

方法

共有 141 名造口患者(74 例病例组和 67 例对照组)接受了一组 3 种生活质量问卷,即简明 36 项健康调查量表(SF-36)、皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和造口适应量表(OAS)。

结果

病例组的平均 DLQI 评分显著高于对照组(1.7 比 0.8;P=0.0026)(评分越高,QOL 越低),病例组的平均 OAS 评分显著低于对照组(151 比 166;P=0.0083)(OAS 评分越低,调整/ QOL 越差)。同样,自我报告有造口周围皮肤问题的患者的平均 DLQI 评分(2.6 比 0.8;P=0.004)和平均 OAS 评分(145 比 163;P=0.046)显著低于未报告皮肤问题但被皮肤科医生诊断为皮肤问题的造口患者。QOL 评分与医生评估的皮肤问题严重程度呈反比。

结论

与无皮肤问题的造口患者相比,有皮肤问题的造口患者的 QOL 受到轻微但显著的负面影响。同样,自我报告有皮肤问题的造口患者的评分表明 QOL 较低。医生评估的皮肤问题严重程度与 QOL 相关,皮肤问题较严重的造口患者的 QOL 低于皮肤问题较轻的造口患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验