Croatian Medical Journal, Zagreb, Croatia.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jan;25(1):72-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1165-8. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
Mentorship is perceived to play a significant role in the career development and productivity of academic clinicians, but little is known about the characteristics of mentorship. This knowledge would be useful for those developing mentorship programs.
To complete a systematic review of the qualitative literature to explore and summarize the development, perceptions and experiences of the mentoring relationship in academic medicine.
Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Current Contents databases from the earliest available date to December 2008.
We included studies that used qualitative research methodology to explore the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. Two investigators independently assessed articles for relevance and study quality, and extracted data using standardized forms. No restrictions were placed on the language of articles.
A total of 8,487 citations were identified, 114 full text articles were assessed, and 9 articles were selected for review. All studies were conducted in North America, and most focused on the initiation and cultivation phases of the mentoring relationship. Mentoring was described as a complex relationship based on mutual interests, both professional and personal. Mentees should take an active role in the formation and development of mentoring relationships. Good mentors should be sincere in their dealings with mentees, be able to listen actively and understand mentees' needs, and have a well-established position within the academic community. Some of the mentoring functions aim at the mentees' academic growth and others at personal growth. Barriers to mentoring and dysfunctional mentoring can be related to personal factors, relational difficulties and structural/institutional barriers.
Successful mentoring requires commitment and interpersonal skills of the mentor and mentee, but also a facilitating environment at academic medicine's institutions.
指导被认为在学术临床医生的职业发展和生产力方面发挥着重要作用,但人们对指导的特点知之甚少。这些知识对于那些正在制定指导计划的人将是有用的。
对定性文献进行系统回顾,以探索和总结学术医学中指导关系的发展、看法和经验。
从最早可用日期到 2008 年 12 月,使用 Medline、PsycINFO、ERIC、Scopus 和 Current Contents 数据库。
我们纳入了使用定性研究方法来探索学术医学中指导意义和特征的研究。两名调查员独立评估文章的相关性和研究质量,并使用标准化表格提取数据。文章的语言不受限制。
共鉴定出 8487 条引文,评估了 114 篇全文文章,选择了 9 篇文章进行综述。所有研究均在美国进行,大多数研究集中在指导关系的启动和培养阶段。指导被描述为一种基于共同利益的复杂关系,包括专业和个人利益。学员应在指导关系的形成和发展中发挥积极作用。优秀的导师在与学员打交道时应该真诚,能够积极倾听并理解学员的需求,并在学术界有良好的地位。一些指导功能旨在促进学员的学术成长,另一些则旨在促进个人成长。指导的障碍和功能失调的指导可能与个人因素、关系困难和结构/制度障碍有关。
成功的指导需要导师和学员的承诺和人际交往能力,还需要学术医学机构提供有利的环境。