• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际货币基金组织与烟草:一种普通产品?

The International Monetary Fund and tobacco: a product like any other?

作者信息

Gilmore Anna, Fooks Gary, McKee Martin

机构信息

London School of Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(4):789-93. doi: 10.2190/HS.39.4.l.

DOI:10.2190/HS.39.4.l
PMID:19927416
Abstract

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has promoted the lifting of trade restrictions on tobacco and the privatization of state-owned tobacco industries as part of its loan conditions. Growing evidence shows that tobacco industry privatization stimulates tobacco consumption and smoking prevalence in borrowing countries. Privatized tobacco companies make favorable tobacco control policies a condition of their investment and lobby aggressively against further control measures. This, along with increased efficiency of the private sector, leads to increases in marketing, substantial reductions in excise taxes, drops in cigarette prices, and overall rises in sales of cigarettes. The actions of the IMF have therefore led to substantially greater use of tobacco, a product that kills half of its consumers when used as intended, with little evidence of economic gain.

摘要

国际货币基金组织(IMF)已将取消烟草贸易限制和国有烟草行业私有化作为其贷款条件的一部分。越来越多的证据表明,烟草行业私有化刺激了借款国的烟草消费和吸烟率。私有化的烟草公司将有利的烟草控制政策作为其投资条件,并积极游说反对进一步的控制措施。这与私营部门效率的提高一起,导致营销增加、消费税大幅降低、香烟价格下跌以及香烟销售总额上升。因此,国际货币基金组织的行动导致烟草的使用大幅增加,而烟草按预期使用时会导致一半的消费者死亡,且几乎没有经济收益的证据。

相似文献

1
The International Monetary Fund and tobacco: a product like any other?国际货币基金组织与烟草:一种普通产品?
Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(4):789-93. doi: 10.2190/HS.39.4.l.
2
A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: Implications for policy.烟草业私有化影响的综述:对政策的启示。
Glob Public Health. 2011;6(6):621-42. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2011.595727.
3
Transnational tobacco company influence on tax policy during privatization of a state monopoly: British American Tobacco and Uzbekistan.跨国烟草公司在国家垄断企业私有化期间对税收政策的影响:英美烟草公司与乌兹别克斯坦
Am J Public Health. 2007 Nov;97(11):2001-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.078378. Epub 2006 Nov 30.
4
How International Monetary Fund and World Bank policies undermine labor power and rights.国际货币基金组织和世界银行的政策如何损害劳动力和劳动者权利。
Int J Health Serv. 2002;32(3):433-42. doi: 10.2190/WMC9-0WWJ-8QWR-UFPC.
5
[Expansion of the tobacco industry and smuggling: challenges for public health in developing countries].[烟草行业扩张与走私:发展中国家公共卫生面临的挑战]
Salud Publica Mex. 2006;48 Suppl 1:S183-9. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342006000700022.
6
Disentangling regional trade agreements, trade flows and tobacco affordability in sub-Saharan Africa.解析撒哈拉以南非洲地区的区域贸易协定、贸易流动与烟草可负担性
Global Health. 2017 Nov 14;13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0305-x.
7
The International Monetary Fund's effects on global health: before and after the 2008 financial crisis.国际货币基金组织对全球健康的影响:2008年金融危机前后
Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(4):771-81. doi: 10.2190/HS.39.4.j.
8
Can demand-side policies stop the tobacco industry's damage? Lessons from Turkey.需求侧政策能否阻止烟草行业的危害?来自土耳其的经验教训。
Glob Public Health. 2015;10(7):777-93. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.998699. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
9
Pushing up smoking incidence: plans for a privatised tobacco industry in Moldova.推动吸烟率上升:摩尔多瓦烟草行业私有化计划。
Lancet. 2005;365(9467):1354-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61035-5.
10
International trade agreements: a threat to tobacco control policy.国际贸易协定:对烟草控制政策的一种威胁。
Tob Control. 2005 Aug;14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii19-25. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.007930.

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling regional trade agreements, trade flows and tobacco affordability in sub-Saharan Africa.解析撒哈拉以南非洲地区的区域贸易协定、贸易流动与烟草可负担性
Global Health. 2017 Nov 14;13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0305-x.
2
"Trade policy, not morals or health policy": the US Trade Representative, tobacco companies and market liberalization in Thailand.“贸易政策,而非道德或卫生政策”:美国贸易代表、烟草公司与泰国的市场自由化
Glob Soc Policy. 2012 Aug;12(2):149-172. doi: 10.1177/1468018112443686.
3
The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR.
企业社会责任的局限:中和技巧、利益相关者管理与政治企业社会责任
J Bus Ethics. 2013 Jan;112(2):283-299. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1250-5.
4
Tobacco control, global health policy and development: towards policy coherence in global governance.烟草控制、全球卫生政策与发展:全球治理中的政策一致性
Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):274-80. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050418.
5
Understanding the vector in order to plan effective tobacco control policies: an analysis of contemporary tobacco industry materials.为了制定有效的烟草控制政策,必须理解烟草业的传播手段:对当代烟草业文献的分析。
Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):119-26. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050397.
6
A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: Implications for policy.烟草业私有化影响的综述:对政策的启示。
Glob Public Health. 2011;6(6):621-42. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2011.595727.